8-MW wind turbine tower computational shell buckling benchmark. Part 1: An international ‘round-robin’ exercise
Source abstract
Abstract
An assessment of the elastic-plastic buckling limit state for multi-strake wind turbine support towers poses a particular challenge for the modern finite element analyst, who must competently navigate numerous modelling choices related to the tug-of-war between meshing and computational cost, the use of solvers that are robust to highly nonlinear behaviour, the potential for multiple near-simultaneously critical failure locations, the complex issue of imperfection sensitivity and finally the interpretation of the data into a safe and economic design. This paper reports on an international ‘round-robin’ exercise conducted in 2022 aiming to take stock of the computational shell buckling expertise around the world which attracted 29 submissions. Participants were asked to perform analyses of increasing complexity on a standardised benchmark of an 8-MW multi-strake steel wind turbine support tower segment, from a linear elastic stress analysis to a linear bifurcation analysis to a geometrically and materially nonlinear buckling analysis with imperfections. The results are a showcase of the significant shell buckling expertise now available in both industry and academia. This paper is the first of a pair. The second paper presents a detailed reference solution to the benchmark, including an illustration of the Eurocode-compliant calibration of two important imperfection forms. Full details are here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107133.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. J.G. Teng, J.M. Rotter, “Buckling of Thin Metal Shell” (Compendium of Chapters), Spon Press, 2004.10.4324/9780203301609 ↗
2. ECCS EDR5#2, “Buckling of steel shells – European Design Recommendations” 5th Edition, 2nd Impression, in: J.M. Rotter, H. Schmidt, European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Brussels, 2013.
3. ENV 1993-1-6, “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-6: General rules – Supplementary rules for the strength and stability of shell structures” Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN, Brussels, 1999.
4. EN 1993-1-6, “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-6: Strength and stability of shell structures” Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN, Brussels, 2007.
5. EN 1993-1-6:A1, “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-6: Strength and stability of shell structures, Amendment A1” Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN, Brussels, 2017.
6. J.M. Rotter, “The new method of reference resistance design for shell structures” in: Proc. Int. Colloquium on Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures, SDSS 2016, 2016, pp. 623-630.
7. A computational strategy to establish algebraic parameters for the Reference Resistance Design of metal shell structures10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.02.012 ↗
8. prEN 1993-1-6, “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-6: Strength and stability of shell structures, Final Document for CEN Enquiry” Commité Européen de Normalisation, CEN, Brussels, 2021.
9. Guggenberger · 1992
10. Buckling behaviour of axially loaded steel cylinders on local supports – with and without internal pressure10.1016/S0263-8231(98)00011-1 ↗
11. prEN 1993-1-14, “Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-14: Design assisted by finite element analysis, Final Document for CEN Enquiry” Commité Européen de Normalisation, CEN, Brussels, 2021.
12. J.M.F.G. Holst, J.Y. Ooi, J.M. Rotter, G.H. Rong, Numerical modelling of silo filling. I: Continuum analyses, ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 125(1) (1999a) 94-103.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:1(94) ↗
13. J.M.F.G. Holst, J.M. Rotter, J.Y. Ooi, G.H. Rong, Numerical modelling of silo filling. II: Discrete element analyses, ASCE Journal of Eng. Mech. 125(1) (1999b) 104-110.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:1(104) ↗
14. Phase II benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges10.1002/stc.23 ↗
15. Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridged10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(857) ↗
16. M.J. Hinton, A.S. Kaddour, P.D. Soden, “The world-wide failure exercise: its origin, concept and content” Chapter 1.1 in Failure Criteria in Fibre-Reinforced-Polymer Composites, The World-Wide Failure Exercise, 2004, pp. 2-28.10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50002-0 ↗
17. A round robin study on modelling the fire resistance of a loaded steel beam10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.05.013 ↗
18. IEC 61400-1, “Wind energy generation systems – Part 1: Design requirements” International Electrochemical Commission, Geneva, 2019.
19. Shell buckling design and assessment and the LBA-MNA methodology10.1002/stab.201101491 ↗
20. Calladine · 1983
21. Ovalisation restraint in four-point bending tests of tubes10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001571 ↗
22. Nonlinear stability of thin elastic cylinders of different length under global bending10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.04.002 ↗
23. Elastic imperfect tip-loaded cantilever cylinders of varying length10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.027 ↗
24. “Buckling of cylindrical metal shells under axial compression” Chapter 2
25. On the advantages of hybrid beam-shell structural finite element models for the efficient analysis of metal wind turbine support towers10.1016/j.finel.2019.05.002 ↗
26. Accurate determination of plastic collapse loads from finite element analysis10.1115/1.4002770 ↗
27. Elastic stability of cylindrical shells with weld depressions10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1244) ↗
28. Local buckling of axially compressed cylindrical shells with different boundary conditions10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.039 ↗