journal article·2020-01

Successful prediction of slope failure in an excavation trial

E. Botero, E. Ovando, M.J. Mendoza

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A new airport for Mexico City was to be constructed some 15 km north of the city at a site in characterized by the existence of very soft, very compressible lacustrine clays that also exhibit very low shear strengths. The construction of the passenger terminal required a rather large excavation that was to be taken down to a depth of 6.5 with slopes having 4:1 gradients. In this paper we describe the general consideration that led the designers to this geometry and to the decision of carrying out a large-scale excavation trial. Simplified limit equilibrium analyses correctly predicted that the excavation would fail before reaching the projected depth. Based on instrumental observations, we give an account of the progress of the excavation until it failed on November 30, 2016, when the excavation reached a depth of 5.0 m below the original ground level. We discuss the events prior to the actual failure, the results of post-failure analyses and the lessons learnt from the results of the excavation trial. Finally, we also discuss the results and validity of sophisticated numerical analyses and of limit analyses performed a priori as well as the results of back calculations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Aguirre, L.M. y Zarate, M. (1967) “Performance studies of the Mexico City International Airport. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan. pp. 658–660.
2. Aguirre, L.M. y Zarate, M. (1985) “Problematic of geotechnical performance of the Mexico City International Airport runways built on ancient Texcoco Lake”. Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. San Francisco, Estados Unidos. pp. 2381-2384.
3. Alberro, J., 1979, “Stabilité à long terme des excavations dans la ville de Mexico”, Simposio Internacional de Mecánica de Suelos, Sociedad Mexicana de Mecánica de Suelos, Vol. 1, Oaxaca, México.
4. ARUP (2018). “Nuevo Aeropuerto Internacional de la Ciudad de México”. https://lopezobrador.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/6.-%C3%81rea-Terminal-y-Torre-ARUP.pdf.
5. Botero E. and Ossa A. (2015). Reply to the discussion by Gao, L. and Hu, G., on “Stress-strain behavior of a silty soil reinforced with polyethylene terephthalate (PET)” [Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43 (4), 2015, pp. 363–369].10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.003 ↗
6. CIMESA (2016). Internal Reports to GACM.
7. Hiriart · 1969 · 328
8. Marsal, R. J. y Mazari, M. (1959) “El subsuelo de la Ciudad de México”. Facultad de Ingeniería, UNAM. México.
9. Marsal, R.J y Graue, R (1969) “El subsuelo del lago de Texcoco”. Nabor Carrillo Conmemorative Volume: 167-202.
10. Sondeos con cono eléctrico en el Centro de la Ciudad de México
11. Excavaciones del sistema hidráulico en el Lago de Texcoco
12. Ovando-Shelley, E., Romo, M.P., Contreras, N. y Giralt, A. (2003). “Effects on soil properties of future settlements in downtown Mexico City due to ground wáter extraction”. Geofísica Internacional (42):185-204.10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2003.42.2.264 ↗
13. Hernández, Z, Flores, O and Fernández, A (2019) Cyclic behaviour and dynamic properties of Texcoco Clays near Mexico City
14. Oasys (2014). “Program Slope”.
15. Rocscience (2017). “Program Slide2”.
16. Santoyo Villa · 2005
17. “Empleo del cono estático en un túnel de la Ciudad de México”, Memorias X Reunión Nacional de Mecánica de Suelos
18. Santoyo, E., Lin Xue R., Ovando E. (1989). “El cono en la exploración geotécnica”. TGC:109-130.
19. Tamez E. (2001). “Ingeniería de cimentaciones: conceptos básicos de la práctica” México: TCG Geotecnia, 2001.
20. TGC (2016). Internal Reports to GACM.