Performance assessment of irregular RC buildings with shear walls after Earthquake
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper discusses the behavior of frame-wall irregularity on established existing reinforced concrete (RC) structures that were subjected to the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey. In particular, reference is made to the nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) structures containing shear walls. The layered shell model has been chosen due to its advantages. The damage observed after reconnaissance studies has been captured using the 3D model. The imperfections that the irregularity effects caused are discussed throughout the paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Sullivan TJ, Priestley MJN, Calvi GM. Seismic design of frame-wall structures. Research Report Rose 2006/02.
2. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
3. Priestley · 2007
4. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings10.1193/1.1646390 ↗
5. Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis?10.1080/13632460209350435 ↗
6. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design10.1193/1.1586128 ↗
7. Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051 ↗
8. López-Menjivar MA. Verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover method for assessment of 2-D reinforced concrete buildings. Pavia, Italy: European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), University of Pavia. PhD Thesis; 2004.
9. Displacement estimates for performance-based seismic design10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(905) ↗
10. Nonlinear static cyclic pushover analysis for flexural failure of reinforced concrete bridge columns with combined damage mechanisms10.1007/s00707-013-0970-7 ↗
11. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures10.1193/1.1586117 ↗
12. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
13. The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation10.1002/eqe.1104 ↗
14. The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation10.1007/s10518-011-9319-6 ↗
15. Seismic evaluation of an existing complex RC building10.1007/s10518-009-9155-0 ↗
16. Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings10.1080/13632460509350568 ↗
17. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings10.1002/eqe.380 ↗
18. Use of pushover analysis for predicting seismic response of irregular buildings: a case study10.1080/13632460902898308 ↗
19. An energy-based formulation for first and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses10.1080/13632460409350481 ↗
20. An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral deformation for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation10.1023/A:1024853326383 ↗
21. Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings10.1002/eqe.1060 ↗
22. Penelis GG, Kappos AJ. 3D pushover analysis: the issue of torsion. In: Proceedings of 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No. 015. London, UK; 2002.
23. Extension of the CSM-FEMA440 to plan-asymmetric real building structures10.1002/eqe.1087 ↗
24. Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method10.1007/s10518-011-9252-8 ↗
25. A new pushover procedure for two-way asymmetric-plan tall buildings under bidirectional earthquakes
26. Adhikari G, Pinho R. Development and application of nonlinear static procedures for plan-asymmetric buildings. Research Report Rose 2010/01.
27. Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), SAP2000. Three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures V16.0.2, Berkeley; 2013.
28. Turkish Earthquake Resistant Design Code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara; 2007.
29. Fema 273 NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. NEHRP; 1997.
30. Fema 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. NEHRP; 2000.
31. Fema 440 Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. NEHRP; 2005.
32. Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
33. Menegotto M, Pinto PE. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending∗. In: Symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined loads. International Association for Bridges and Structural Engineering; 1973. p. 15–22.
34. XTRACT 3.0.8, Cross-sectional structural analysis of components; 2007.
35. Seismosignal, Seismosoft; 2010.