Annex and rigid diaphragm effects on the failure analysis and earthquake damages of historic churches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Historical churches, in the most of cases, are characterised by the presence of annexes and rigid diaphragm that influence their seismic response. Therefore, this research aims to investigate the disadvantages and the benefits which emerge during the horizontal dynamic actions between these structures. This study presents some analyses carried out on the Gesu Church in Mirandola, which was damaged by the 2012 Northern Italy earthquake. The first fundamental steps have been the geometrical, material and in particular the seismic damage survey. An undamaged finite element model of the actual configuration of the Gesu church with a perfectly connected annex was created and was also considered the same model as an isolated structure. Through these FE models preliminary modal dynamic analyses were conducted in the linear elastic field. Subsequently non-linear static analyses were carried out to investigate the ultimate capacity of the building. The churches are characterised by large halls without internal thorn walls, slender walls, pushing elements and lack of intermediate horizontal connection. All these factors lead each macroelement to have an independent dynamics, showing the absence of box-like behaviour. Since the roof trusses are one of the few structural elements that can determine a better global behaviour, it has been decided to perform the same numerical analyses even in the FE models without the roof, then considering the extreme case of a not effective simply supported roof.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Russo · 2012 · 52 · 341
2. Wind Strength of Gothic Cathedrals10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.04.019 ↗
3. Le Chiese e il Terremoto. Dalla vulnerabilità constatata nel terremoto del Friuli al miglioramento antisismico nel restauro
4. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and EMergency planning10.1193/1.1737735 ↗
5. DPCM · 2011
6. Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: possibilities of non-linear finite elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.016 ↗
7. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016 ↗
8. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021 ↗
9. Numerical assessment of the static and seismic behaviour of the Basilica of Santa Maria all'impruneta (Italy)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.028 ↗
10. Seismic behavior of a complex historical church in L'Aquila10.1080/15583058.2012.736013 ↗
11. Seismic behavior of the San Pietro di Coppito Church Bell Tower in L'Aquila, Italy10.2174/1874149501206010131 ↗
12. Modelling and analysis of a Basilica under earthquake loading10.1016/j.culher.2003.03.002 ↗
13. On the monitoring of historic Anime Sante church damaged by earthquake in L'Aquila
14. On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior
15. Effect of local geology on ground motion in the city of Palermo, Italy, as inferred from aftershocks of the 6 September 2002 Mw5.9 earthquake10.1785/0120040219 ↗
16. The performance of piezolectric accelerometers in the seismic monitoring of a damaged historical monument in downtown L'Aquila
17. Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3 ↗
18. Influence of the annex on seismic behaviour of historic churches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.004 ↗
19. DIANA · 2010
20. Decreto Ministeriale 14/01/08. “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”
21. Almeida · 2002
22. Non-orthogonal cracks in a smeared finite element model10.1108/eb023599 ↗
23. Rots · 1988
24. The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear
25. Feenstra · 1993
26. Lourenco · 1996
27. FEMA-273, Building Seismic Safety Council · 1997
28. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗