A review of the ESB small punch test data on various plant components with special emphasis on fractographic details
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The present paper was aimed at reporting the experience within the ESB regarding small punch testing of various plant components including steam drums, rotors and turbine bolts. It was shown that a reasonable relationship existed between the Charpy FATT and the small punch transition temperature, TSP. The TSP value coincided with a small punch energy level of some 0.75 J while the upper and lower shelf energies were 1.2 and 0.2 J, respectively. A detailed fractographic study revealed that the upper and lower shelf regions corresponded to fully ductile and brittle failure respectively. Furthermore, the extent of ductile fracture increased with temperature. Indeed, is was found that the TSP value corresponded with around 25% ductile fracture and a ductile crack depth of some 120 μm. A reasonable relationship was shown to exist between the Charpy FATT and the small punch energy value at liquid nitrogen temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Thornton · Eng Fract Mechs · 1979 · 22 · 177
2. Thorby · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1976 · 20 · 167
3. Bulloch · Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping · 1998 · 75 · 77710.1016/S0308-0161(98)00076-3 ↗
4. Joo · J. Testing Eval. · 1992 · 6 · 20
5. Manigan MP, Browing AE, Harling OK. In: Corwin WR, Lucas GE, editors. ASTM, STP 888. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA. P. 17–49.
6. Lucas · J. Nucl Mater. · 1984 · 122 · 42910.1016/0022-3115(84)90635-4 ↗
7. Baik JM, Kamada J, Buick O. In: Corwin WR, Lucas GE, editors. ASTM, STP888. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, p. 92–111.
8. Misawa · J. Nucl Mater. · 1987 · 212 · 202
9. Foulds JH, Jewett CW, Viswanathan R. Proc. Inter. Conf. Power Generation, San Diego, USA, Oct. 1991, Paper 38.
10. Bulloch JH, Hickey JJ. Proc. ASME, Conf. Service Experience and Reliability Improvement, PVP vol. 288, p. 147–53.
11. Bulloch JH, Fairman AS. Proc. Inter Conf. Plant Condition and Life Management, Baltica 111, Helsinki, 1995, p. 179–86.
12. Bulloch · Int J. Press. Vess. Piping · 1995 · 63 · 17710.1016/0308-0161(94)00050-S ↗
13. Suzuki · J. Nucl Mater. · 1991 · 179 · 44110.1016/0022-3115(91)90119-R ↗
14. Suzuki M, Motokuni E, Nishiyama Y, Fukaya K, Takanori I. In: Corwin WR, Haggag FM, Server WI, editors. ASTM, STP 1204. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, 1993. p. 217–27.
15. Matsushita T, Saucedo ML, Joo YH, Shoji T. Key Engng. Materials 1990;51–52:259–64.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.51-52.259 ↗
16. Norris · Key Eng Mater. · 1993 · 86 · 1710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.86-87.17 ↗
17. Lee WK, Metzger DR, Donner A, Lepik OE. In: Corwin WR, Rosinski ST, Van Walle E, editors. ASTM, STP 1329. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, 1998. p. 540–56.
18. Viswanathan V. EPRI final report (TR-113646). October 1999.
19. Geary W, Dutton JT. In: Corwin WR, Rosinski ST, Van Walle E, editors. ASTM, STP 1329. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, 1998. p. 588–601.
20. Foulds JR, Wu M, Srivastav S, Jewwett CW. In: Corwin WR, Rosinski ST, Van Walle E, editors. ASTM, STP 1329. ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, 1998. p. 557–74.10.1520/STP38012S ↗
21. Fujita · Current Advances in Materials Processes · 1997 · 10 · 1356