journal article·2020-01Open access

Surface analysis of early retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts for both knees in total knee replacement

M.Y. Tan, S. Liza, S.M.P Khadijah, A.A. Abbas, A.M. Merican, K.A. Ayob, N.W.M. Zulkifli, H.H. Masjuki

Abstract

This study involves the failure analysis of a pair of ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) knee tibial inserts from Scorpio® fixed-bearing total knee system by Stryker, which were retrieved from Total Knee Replacements (TKR) that was performed on 64 years old male patient with periprosthetic joint infection detected on both knees. Although the implants were removed due to infection, surface analysis was essential to be studied in order to analyse the surface damage mode of short-term implants. This study reports relevant damage mechanisms seen in early-retrieved UHMWPE tibial inserts (implanted for 6 and 8 months) and further analysis of chemical, physical and mechanical properties that possibly accompanied with failure. The surface characterization was done using a 3D laser microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to evaluate surface damage and dimensional change of both UHMWPE tibial inserts. Nano-indentation is used to measure the hardness and elasticity modulus of the tibial inserts. Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infra-Red (ATR-FTIR), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) were used to characterize the chemical and physical properties of the inserts. In present study, retrieved polyethylene inserts with short implantation duration was considered to have high-grade wear modes. The high incidence of micro pits (with the average depth of 27.5 μm for 6 months insert and 18 μm for 8 months insert) and scratches as the observed surface defects strengthen the role played by the particles upon defects generation for both tibial inserts. The average surface roughness of 6 and 8 months inserts were 1.6798 μm and 1.2376 μm, respectively. The rough surface (4.207 μm) of region 4 at the lateral compartment proves that the 6 months tibial insert suffered more damage due to loosening defect where the radiolucencies (the gap between bone and cement) were seen below medial and lateral aspects of the tibial tray. Our data demonstrated a strong association between the change of molecular weight and degradation of mechanical properties with wear for both inserts. The oxidation induced wear mechanism was observed on 6 months old insert due to the presence of delamination features with the evidence of in vivo oxidation from IR analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Assuring the happy total knee replacement patient10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32949 ↗
2. Halpern Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 203010.2106/00004623-200704000-00012 ↗
3. Life estimation of knee joint prosthesis by combined effect of fatigue and wear10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.072 ↗
4. Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management10.1007/s12570-011-0066-6 ↗
5. Failure analysis for degradation of a polyethylene knee prosthesis component10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.02.007 ↗
6. Analysis of total knee arthroplasty revision causes10.1186/s12891-018-1977-y ↗
7. Why total knees fail: a modern perspective review10.5312/wjo.v9.i4.60 ↗
8. Biomimetic surface design for ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene to improve the tribological properties10.1177/1350650112437829 ↗
9. Early aseptic loosening of a mobile-bearing total knee replacement10.1080/17453674.2017.1398012 ↗
10. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty10.1097/00003086-200111000-00041 ↗
11. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003 ↗
12. Diagnosis and management of infected total knee arthroplasty10.2174/1874325001105010086 ↗
13. Analysis of retrieved ultra–high-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial components from rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.003 ↗
14. How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces?10.5435/00124635-200800001-00011 ↗
15. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear10.1097/BLO.0b013e31806dba05 ↗
16. Controlled nanodot fabrication by rippling polycarbonate surface using and AFM diamond tip10.1186/1556-276X-9-372 ↗
17. Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene tibial inserts10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00293-6 ↗
18. Mechanical properties and tribological behaviour of retrieved UHMWPE Tibial insert in total knee replacement after implantation 30 months
19. On the assessment of oxidative and microstructure changes after in vivo degradation of Historical Uhmwpe Knee Components by Means of Vibrational Spectroscopies and Nanoindentation10.1002/jbm.a.31992 ↗
20. Kurtz · 2004
21. Retrieval analysis of total knee protheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar protheses10.1002/jbm.820170510 ↗
22. Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.012 ↗
23. Failure analysis of retrieved UHMWPE tibial insert in total knee replacement10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.04.001 ↗
24. Knee simulator testing of conventional and cross linked polyethylene tibial inserts10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.019 ↗
25. Analysis of wear and friction of total knee replacements Part I. Wear assessment on a three station wear simulator10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.024 ↗
26. Contact stresses and fatigue life in a knee prosthesis: comparisonbetween in vitro measurements and computational simulations10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00255-0 ↗
27. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90195-4 ↗
28. The effect of real-time aging on the oxidation and wear of highly cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liner10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.002 ↗