journal article·2015-09

Closed form solution for predicting the horizontal capacity of masonry portal frames through limit analysis and comparison with experimental test results

Giuseppe Brandonisio, Elena Mele, Antonello De Luca

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The paper deals with the problem of evaluating the in-plane seismic capacity of unreinforced masonry portal frame, which can be considered the basic structural element in historical buildings. In particular, the Limit Analysis approach is used to provide simplified “closed form” expressions of the horizontal collapse multiplier, also taking into account the eventual contribution of steel tie rods. Both sliding shear and shear diagonal cracking are also considered in order to take into account the shear failure modes of the pier walls. The proposed formulations have been used for performing an extensive parametric analysis, with the aim of studying the effect of both geometry and vertical/horizontal loading distributions on the portal horizontal strength. Furthermore, the influence of the steel tie-rods has been addressed in order to understand their effectiveness on the portal seismic capacity. A comparison with the results of experimental tests on full-scale portal frames is also provided in terms of in-plane collapse multiplier and failure mechanism aimed to validate the proposed “closed form” expressions. Major outcome of this study is a simple rule of thumb, which can be used for the straightforward assessment of the horizontal strength of simple masonry structures, and for verifying the results of more complex structural analyses such as the nonlinear static analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Navier CL. Résumé des Leçons donées à L’École des Ponts et Chaussées, sur l’application de la mécanique à l’établissement des constructions et des machines. Paris; 1833.
2. De La Hire P. Sur la construction des voûtesdans les édifices, Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences; 1712.
3. Poleni G. Memorie istoriche della Gran Cupola del Tempio Vaticano; 1748.
4. Coulomb CA. Essaisurune application des règles des maximis et minimis à quelques problèmes de statique relatifs à l’architecture. Paris; 1773.
5. Rondelet JB. Trattato teorico e pratico dell’arte di edificare, Tomo IV-Teoria delle Costruzioni. 1802. Prima edizione napolitana notabilmente migliorata e corretta da Raffaele Pepe. Napoli; 1840 [in Italian].
6. Breymann GA. Trattato generale di costruzioni civili con cenni speciali intorno alle costruzioni grandiose. Edizione rifatta da H. Lang e A. Scholtz – traduzione italiana degli ingegneri C. Valentini e Lo Gatto, Antica Casa Editrice dott. Francesco Vallardi – Milano; 1885 [in Italian].
7. Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches
9. Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions. Classical and advanced approaches10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1 ↗
10. A computer model for simulating progressive large-scale movements in blocky rock systems
11. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 ↗
12. Lemos JV. A distinct element model for dynamic analysis of jointed rock with application to dam foundations and fault motion. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Minnesota; 1987.
13. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—part I: a scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks10.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-0 ↗
14. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—part II: mechanical calculations10.1016/0148-9062(88)92294-2 ↗
15. Discrete element modelling of masonry structures10.1080/15583050601176868 ↗
16. Limit analysis of structures formed by rigid blocks10.1002/nme.1620121207 ↗
17. Rigid-block analysis of masonry structures
18. Analysis of multi-ring brickwork arch bridges
19. Orduna A, Lourenço PB. Limit analysis as a tool for the simplified assessment of ancient masonry structures. In: Historical constructions, Guimaraes: Universidade do Minho; 2001. p. 511–20.
20. Limit analysis for no-tension and frictional three-dimensional discrete systems10.1080/08905459708945496 ↗
21. Finite element model for masonry10.1061/JSDEAG.0004969 ↗
22. A mathematical description of macroscopic behaviour of brick masonry10.1016/0020-7683(92)90052-U ↗
23. Derivation of the in-plane elastic characteristics of masonry through homogenization theory
24. In-plane and out-of-plane homogenisation of masonry
25. Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part I: the mortar joint model and its applications10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199704)26:4<423::AID-EQE650>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
26. Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: the continuum model and its applications10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199704)26:4<441::AID-EQE651>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
27. Homogenization technique and damage model for old masonry material10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00167-9 ↗
28. A homogenization approach to the ultimate strength of brick masonry10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00002-1 ↗
29. A micro-mechanical model for the homogenization of masonry10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00230-5 ↗
30. Milani G. Homogenization techniques for in- and out-of-plane loaded masonry walls. Ph.D. Thesis. Italy: University of Study of Ferrara; 2005.
31. Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls. Part I: failure surfaces10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.005 ↗
32. Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls. Part II: structural applications10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.004 ↗
33. A homogenization approach for the limit analysis of out-of-plane loaded masonry walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:10(1650) ↗
34. Constitutive relations for no-tension materials10.1007/BF00989121 ↗
35. Singular stress fields in masonry structures: derand was right10.1007/s11012-014-9880-6 ↗
36. An appraisal of smeared crack models for masonry shear wall analysis10.1016/0045-7949(91)90134-8 ↗
37. Seismic performance assessment of masonry structures with a modified “concrete” model10.1007/s10518-015-9726-1 ↗
38. Lourenço PB. Computational strategies for masonry structures. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 1996.
39. Bucchi A, Aprile A, Tralli A. Analisi pushover di costruzioni in muratura con codici di calcolo commerciali: problematiche a confronto. In: Proc. of ANIDIS 2009 – XIII Convegno ANIDIS “L’ ingegneria Sismica in Italia”. Bologna (Italy), 28 June–2 July; 2009 [in Italian].
40. Arangio S, Bucchi F, Bontempi F. Pushover seismic analysis of masonry buildings with different commercial codes. Built Heritage 2013 Monitoring Conservation Management. p. 773–80.
41. Brandonisio G, De Luca A, Mele E, Mountuori GM. Multi-storey masonry buildings: evaluation of effectiveness of mechanical strengthening. In: Proc. of IIX structural analysis of historical constructions (IIX SAHC), 1780–1788, Wroclaw, Poland, 15–17 October; 2012.
42. Brandonisio G, Mazziotti A, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A. Pushover analysis of masonry buildings: comparison of different modelling through four case studies. In: Proc. of 9th international masonry conference 2014 (9th IMC), Guimarães, Portugal, 7–9 July; 2014.
43. Brandonisio G, Mazziotti A, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A. Seismic behaviour of four Italian masonry buildings: comparison between different modelling. In: Peña F, Chávez M, edotors. Proc. SAHC2014 – 9th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions. Mexico City, Mexico, 14–17 October; 2014.
44. Lourenço PB. Types of analysis: linear static, linear dynamic and non linear static. ().
45. A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.003 ↗
46. Repair and retrofit of unreinforced masonry structures10.1193/1.1585916 ↗
47. In-plane lateral response of a full-scale masonry subassemblage with and without an inorganic matrix-grid strengthening system10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000193 ↗
48. FRP reinforcement of masonry panels by means of C-fiber strips10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.11.005 ↗
49. Coupling effect between masonry spandrels and piers10.1617/s11527-008-9405-7 ↗
50. In-plane behavior of perforated brick masonry walls10.1617/s11527-011-9814-x ↗
51. Structural performance of confined masonry walls retrofitted using ferrocement and GFRP under in-plane cyclic loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.035 ↗
52. Analysis of masonry arches and vaults10.1002/pse.84 ↗
53. Lourenço PB. Analysis of historical constructions: from thrust-lines to advanced simulations. In: Lourenço PB, Roca P, editors. Historical constructions. Guimarães; 2001. p. 91–116.
54. Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.002 ↗
55. Como M, Grimaldi A. Analisi limite di pareti murarie sotto spinta. In: Quaderni di teoria e tecnica delle strutture. Università di Napoli, Istituto di Tecnica delle Costruzioni; 1983 [in Italian].
56. A simple formula for predicting the horizontal capacity of masonry portal frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.011 ↗
57. Como M, Lanni G, Sacco E. Sul calcolo delle catene di rinforzo negli edifici in muratura soggetti ad azioni sismica. V Convegno Nazionale l’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Palermo (Italy); 1991 [in Italian].
58. Como M, Ianniruberto U, Imbimbo M. Limit analysis of the structures of Colosseum. In: Proc. of III structural analysis of historical constructions (III SAHC). Guimaraes; 2001.
59. Como · 2013
60. Turnšek V, Čačovič F. Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international brick & block masonry conference, Stoke-on-Trent; 1970. p. 149–56.
61. Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake 200910.1007/s10518-011-9307-x ↗
62. Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.040 ↗
63. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in 2009 L’Aquila earthquake
64. Hendry · 2004
65. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings
66. CEN. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, EN 1998–3. European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, Belgium; 2005.
67. NTC’08: Italian Building Code for the Constructions (Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni). D.M. 14 January 2008 – S.O. n. 30, G. U. n. 29–4 February 2008 (in Italian).
68. CM’09: Instruction for the application of the Building Standard for Constructions. G.U. n. 47 del 26-2-2009. Suppl. Ordinario n.27 – Circolare 2 febbraio; 2009, p. 617 [in Italian].
69. Restoration through a traditional intervention of a historic unreinforced masonry building “Palazzo Scarpa” in Naples10.1080/15583058.2011.632468 ↗
70. Seismic damage and performance of Palazzo Centi after L’Aquila earthquake: a paradigmatic case study of effectiveness of mechanical steel ties10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.011 ↗