Automobile parts reliability prediction based on claim data: The comparison of predictive effects with deep learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An automobile company provides quality assurance service based on warranty period, which includes duration and distance driven. The concerned automobile company provides a warranty that begets quality assurance costs in case an accident occurs during this time. If the probability of failure can be ascertained based on the quality assurance area, it will be convenient to manage each part, and it will reduce the cost of quality assurance. It has been reported that failure data is required to predict reliability, thus, claim data containing information about the cause of failure, parts involved, number of days of use, mileage was used in this study. Because these claim data depend on unpredictable accidents, they can be intermittent and irregular. However, the recent accumulation of claim data has provided further opportunities to improve our ability to predict reliability. We collected up to 305,965 claims for a given automobile model over a period of 6–14 years. Using these data, we devise various deep learning model to predict the number of failures and estimate reliability in the presence of these number of failures using the following deep learning methods: 1D convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network (RNN), and sequence to sequence(Seq2Seq). Further, various approaches were used to compare the effectiveness of the proposed models: parametric methods, including Weibull distribution assumption; time-series methods including ARIMA model; and machine learning methods including support vector machine and random forest. Of all the models we tested, the proposed RNN model in this work produces superior performance in failure and reliability prediction. Using this method, an automobile company can significantly reduce costs by predicting the problems of new vehicle models in advance by securing reliability, as well as an accurate prediction of the number of future failures of each automobile part.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Software Reliability and Analysis Research · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure modeling to predict warranty cost for individual markets10.5762/KAIS.2009.10.6.1346 ↗
2. Automotive reliability prediction based on early field failure warranty data10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199803/04)14:2<103::AID-QRE147>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
3. B. Yang, X. Li, A study on software reliability prediction based on support vector machines. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1176-1180). IEEE. (2007, December).10.1109/IEEM.2007.4419377 ↗
4. Software reliability prediction using a deep learning model based on the RNN encoder–decoder10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.019 ↗
5. Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.006 ↗
6. O. Chapelle, V. Vapnik Model selection for support vectormachines (Vol. 12).Advances in neural information processingsystems (1999).
7. M. Abuella, B. Chowdhury, Random forest ensemble of support vector regression models for solar power forecasting. In 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE (2017, April).10.1109/ISGT.2017.8086027 ↗
8. Breiman · 1984
9. V. Chaubey, M.S. Nair, G.N. Pillai, Gene Expression Prediction Using a Deep 1D Convolution Neural Network. In 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1383-1389). IEEE (2019, December).10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002669 ↗
10. Online reliability time series prediction via convolutional neural network and long short term memory for service-oriented systems10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.006 ↗
11. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
12. M.T. Luong, Q.V. Le, I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, L. Kaiser, Multi-task sequence to sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06114 (2015).
13. J. H. Lo, A study of applying ARIMA and SVM model to software reliability prediction. In 2011 International Conference on Uncertainty Reasoning and Knowledge Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 141-144). IEEE (2011, August).10.1109/URKE.2011.6007794 ↗
14. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 ↗
15. Helicopter blade reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.006 ↗
16. A new intelligent system methodology for time series forecasting with artificial neural networks10.1007/s11063-008-9085-x ↗
17. Bland, J Martin; Altman, Douglas G (2004). “The logrank test”. 《BMJ》 328 (7447): 1073. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1073.10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1073 ↗
18. Use of logrank scores in the analysis of litter-matched data on time to tumor appearance
19. Exponential smoothing with an adaptive response rate10.1057/jors.1967.5 ↗
20. C.C. Holt, Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving average. O.N.R. Memorandum, No. 52, Carnegie Institute of Technology (1957).
21. M. J. Berry, G. Linoff, Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer support. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (3rd ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Pro-ed (1997).
22. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data10.2307/2986296 ↗
23. C4.5: Programs for machine learning
24. Split selection methods for classification trees
25. Classification trees with unbiased multiway splits10.1198/016214501753168271 ↗
26. Reliability prediction model of further bus service based on random forest10.1177/1748301817725306 ↗
27. Using neural network and decision tree for machine reliability prediction10.1007/s00170-010-2593-7 ↗
28. Backpropagation through time: What it does and how to do it10.1109/5.58337 ↗
29. Resilient routing mechanism for wireless sensor networks with deep learning link reliability prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984593 ↗
30. An improved CNN model for within-project software defect prediction10.3390/app9102138 ↗