Probabilistic framework for failure investigation of reinforced concrete wall panel under dynamic blast loads
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Over the last decade, excessive devastations caused by extreme events, such as blast loading have raised significant concern on the performance of civil structural systems. Despite realizing the importance of inherent risk associated with this phenomenon, most of the studies neglected the effects of uncertainties associated with the system, wherein the design approaches have been entirely on deterministic scale. Hence, it is deemed important to identify the complexities in the system, and in this regard, a probabilistic framework is proposed which utilizes the effects of uncertainties in the system to compute the failure probabilities of a reinforced concrete (RC) structural member under extreme blast loading. The structural member adopted here is a three-dimensional (3-D) RC wall panel, which is modeled considering material and geometric nonlinearity, and the subsequent analysis is carried out under surface-burst and free airburst scenarios. High strain rate effect induced in the RC wall is modeled using available standard dynamic increase factors (DIFs) for concrete and steel. Uncertainty in the system is assumed in material capacity (strength), mechanical loads, and dynamic blast loads considering a certain mean and standard deviation. Responses are obtained in terms of deflection, stresses, and strains at center of the wall. Limit state of failure and the respective threshold limiting values are obtained from the United States Department of Defense manual, PDC-TR 06-08 (2008). Finally, first-order sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the extent of uncertainties in input parameters affecting the output response quantities. It is concluded that the uncertainty induced in the system has significant influence in the response of the wall panels under blast loading scenarios. Moreover, based on the sensitivity analysis performed, charge weight, standoff distance, and strength of concrete material are suggested to be crucial parameters for design of blast-resistant structures. To conclude, based on the currently considered scenario of intensity of blast, exposure type, and performance level required by the user, it is recommended to use wall panels of sizes more than 100 mm in civil structures, especially 125 mm to counter the effects of extreme blast loadings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS/ Standard User's Manual, Version 6.14, Dassault Systemes, Simulia Corporation, Province, Rhode Island (RI), USA.
2. Behavior of reinforced concrete sandwiched panels (RCSPs) under blast load10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.051 ↗
3. Explosive breaching of reinforced concrete walls: experimental efforts and numerical simulations
4. Rate dependent behavior and modeling of concrete based on SHPB experiments10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.011 ↗
5. Experimental analysis on tensile dynamic behavior of existing concrete under high strain rates
6. Reliability of ductility requirements in concrete design codes10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.005 ↗
7. Vulnerability analysis of tunnel linings under blast loading10.1177/2041419618789438 ↗
8. Evaluation of blast resistance and failure behavior of prestressed concrete under blast loading10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.047 ↗
9. D. Cormie, G. Mays, P. Smith, “Blast effects on buildings”, Thomas Telford Publishing, 2nd Edition, London, UK, 2009.10.1680/beob2e.35218 ↗
10. Analysis of live loads in office buildings10.1061/JSDEAG.0004693 ↗
11. Ellingwood · 1980
12. Experimental and numerical evaluation of reinforced concrete walls retrofit systems for blast mitigation10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001265 ↗
13. FEMA P-58 (2012), “Next-generation methodology for seismic performance assessment of buildings”, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington D.C., USA.
14. M.D. Goel, V.A. Matsagar, Blast-resistant design of structures, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction (ASCE), 19(2), Article Number 04014007, 2014.10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000188 ↗
15. Blast resistance of stiffened sandwich panels with aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.017 ↗
16. Performance-based framework for evaluating the flexural response of precast concrete wall panels to blast loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.050 ↗
17. Retrofitting materials for enhanced blast performance of Structures: recent advancement and challenges ahead10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.188 ↗
18. Damage assessment of two-way RC slab subjected to blast load using mode approximation approach10.1142/S0219455417500134 ↗
19. IS 456 (2000), “Plain and reinforced concrete - code of practice”, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
20. IS 875 - Part 2 (1987), “Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: imposed loads”, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India.
21. Predicting reinforced concrete response to blast loads10.1139/L2012-014 ↗
22. Dynamic response of reinforced concrete wall under blast loading
23. Stochastic representation of blast load damage in a reinforced concrete building10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.08.001 ↗
24. Fragility of steel frame buildings under blast load
25. Kinney · 1985
26. Modified SDOF analysis of RC box-type structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:4(726) ↗
27. Response of reinforced concrete elements to severe impulsive loads10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:4(1061) ↗
28. Blast fragility and sensitivity analyses of steel moment frames with plan irregularities10.1007/s13296-018-0077-z ↗
29. Stochastic response analysis of elastic and inelastic systems with uncertain parameters under random impulse loading10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114899 ↗
30. Modelling the response of reinforced concrete panels under blast loading10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.069 ↗
31. Blast testing of high performance geopolymer composite walls reinforced with steel wire mesh and aluminum foam10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.207 ↗
32. Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive loading10.1016/S0167-4730(01)00011-X ↗
33. A nonlinear dynamic uniaxial strength criterion that considers the ultimate dynamic strength of concrete10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.011 ↗
34. Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis - A critical review and revision10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.008 ↗
35. Blast load variability and accuracy of blast load prediction models10.1260/2041-4196.1.4.543 ↗
36. Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): part I-statistical models for resistance
37. Fragility analysis for the performance-based design of cladding wall panels subjected to blast load10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.004 ↗
38. Interaction between concrete cladding panels and fixings under blast loading10.1016/0958-9465(96)00023-6 ↗
39. Reinforced concrete and fiber reinforced concrete panels subjected to blast detonations and post-blast static tests10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.040 ↗
40. Blast fragility and performance-based pressure-impulse diagrams of European reinforced concrete columns10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.019 ↗
41. PDC-TR-06-08 (2008), “Single degree of freedom structural response limits for antiterrorism design”, US Army Corps of Engineers Protective Design Center.
42. Comparison of damage index and fragility curve of RC structure using different Indian standard codes10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_197 ↗
43. Fire fragility of reinforced concrete panels under compressive in-plane and transverse out-of-plane loads10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102976 ↗
44. Probabilistic assessment of steel buildings installed with passive control devices under multi-hazard scenario of earthquake and wind10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101955 ↗
45. Mechanics of damage in reinforced concrete member under post-blast fire scenario10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.005 ↗
46. Risk-targeted safety distance of reinforced concrete buildings from natural-gas transmission pipelines10.1016/j.ress.2015.11.016 ↗
47. About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output10.1016/0951-8320(95)00099-2 ↗
48. Damage and risk assessment for reinforced concrete wall panels subjected to explosive blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.003 ↗
49. Statistical analysis of fragility curves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224) ↗
50. Improving the blast resistance capacity of RC slabs with innovative composite materials10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.015 ↗
51. Blast resistance capacity of reinforced concrete slabs10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000011 ↗
52. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
53. Steel mechanical properties at different strain rates10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(663) ↗
54. Reliability-based load factor design model for explosive blast loading10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.10.010 ↗
55. Probabilistic terrorism risk assessment and risk acceptability for infrastructure protection10.7158/S11-126.2012.13.1 ↗
56. Numerical investigation of the damage of RC members subjected to blast loading10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.001 ↗
57. Energy based load-impulse diagrams with multiple failure modes for blast-loaded reinforced concrete structural elements10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.023 ↗
58. UFC 3-340-02, “Design of structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions”, US Department of Defense, Washington D.C., USA, 2008.
59. UFC 4-010-01, “Minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings”, US Department of Defense, Washington D.C., USA, 2012.
60. Blast responses of CFRP strengthened autoclaved aerated cellular concrete panels10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.064 ↗
61. Numerical simulation of hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns under close-range blast loading10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000871 ↗
62. Numerical simulation of reinforced concrete slab subjected to blast loading and the structural damage assessment10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104926 ↗
63. Numerical simulation study of spallation in reinforced concrete plates subjected to blast loading10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.029 ↗
64. Experimental and numerical study on the dynamic response of RC slabs under blast loading10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.027 ↗
65. An improved nonlinear analytical approach to generate fragility curves of reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loads10.1177/1369433217718986 ↗
66. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures subjected to column loss
67. Modelling of compressive behavior of concrete-like materials at high strain rate10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002 ↗