journal article·2020-01

A CAST-based causal analysis of the catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan

Feng Li, Wenhe Wang, Jiang Xu, Stevan Dubljevic, Faisal Khan, Jun Yi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A deep and thorough analysis of typical accidents beyond immediate failures from a systematic perspective is necessary for safety decision-making in an area. The Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) is one of the most widely used accident models based on systems and control theory, which derives a powerful accident analysis tool defined as Causal Analysis based on Systems Theory (CAST). This study adopts a CAST analysis of the catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan, which is one of the largest petroleum catastrophes in Chinese history. The safety control structure to enforce the safety constraints required by the system hazards is developed and analyzed hierarchically. The analysis has systematically demonstrated the inadequate control and violated safety constraints and uncovered the in-depth rationale behind the decisions that were made leading up to this tragedy. The necessary changes in the overall system safety structure are also recommended based on control flaws identified for each hierarchical level, accordingly. The CAST model is demonstrated to be feasible for continuous improvements in accident analysis and in turn establishing a robust safety system of pipeline gas transportation in Taiwan.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Failure analysis of a natural gas pipeline10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.02.023 ↗
2. Fast method for the hydraulic simulation of natural gas pipeline networks based on the divide-and-conquer approach10.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.017 ↗
3. A mathematical model of crevice corrosion for buried pipeline with disbonded coatings under cathodic protection10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.024 ↗
4. Quantitative risk assessment of sour gas transmission pipelines using CFD10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.057 ↗
5. Dynamic safety assessment of oil and gas pipeline containing internal corrosion defect using probability theory and possibility theory10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.080 ↗
6. Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.067 ↗
7. Comparative study on vulnerability assessment for urban buried gas pipeline network based on SVM and ANN methodology10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.014 ↗
8. Case analysis of catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.013 ↗
9. Risk propagation mechanism: Qingdao crude oil leaking and explosion case study10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.003 ↗
10. Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.040 ↗
11. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.021 ↗
12. A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a Bow-tie model10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.029 ↗
13. Analysis on accident-causing factors of urban buried gas pipeline network by combining DEMATEL, ISM and BN methods10.1016/j.jlp.2019.06.001 ↗
14. SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: methodology and model description10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002 ↗
15. Hollnagel · 2012
16. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 ↗
17. Leveson · 2012
18. Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, Accimap and STAMP models10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.027 ↗
19. Broken components versus broken systems: why it is systems not people that lose situation awareness10.1007/s10111-015-0324-4 ↗
20. Systemic approaches to incident analysis in aviation: comparison of STAMP, agent-based modelling and institutions10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.009 ↗
21. STAMP—holistic system safety approach or just another risk model?10.1016/j.jlp.2014.07.010 ↗
22. A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.014 ↗
23. Analysis of soma mine disaster using causal analysis based on systems theory (CAST)10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.028 ↗
24. Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009 ↗
25. Investigation on the key response factors of action plan in underground pipeline emergency scenario10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.027 ↗