Failure analysis and design of grouted fibre-composite repair system for corroded steel pipes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Grouted fibre-reinforced composite stand-off sleeve repair is a light-weight and easily deployable repair system for steel pipelines with localised metal loss. The effectiveness of this type of repair system is dependent on the load transfer through the grout layer, which is weaker than neighbouring components and susceptible to failure due to stresses developed from applied internal pressure. In this study, three dimensional (3D) Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of a full-scale pipe with different levels of metal loss were implemented to evaluate the failure behaviour and capacity of grouted composite repair system. Steel pipes with a localised defect ranging from 20% to 80% metal loss and repaired using two infill grout systems reinforced with carbon and glass sleeves of different thicknesses were considered. The results indicated that the performance of the repair system is governed by the tensile cracking of the infill grout. A thicker sleeve and higher tensile strength grout delivers higher pipe capacity in the repair system. On the other hand, a high modulus grout provides a more effective load transfer from steel to sleeve. Using a high tensile strength grout, the composite repair system can restore the capacity of the steel pipe with defect up to about 70% metal loss.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. World oil: market or mayhem?10.1257/jep.23.3.145 ↗
2. Status of geothermal energy amongst the world's energy sources10.1016/j.geothermics.2003.07.004 ↗
3. Defectiveness of external and internal surfaces of the main oil and gas pipelines after long-term operation10.3846/13923730.2015.1100672 ↗
4. A. Cosham, P. Hopkins, The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual, 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference, 2002, pp. 1565-1581.10.1115/IPC2002-27067 ↗
5. Pitting corrosion of metals a review of the critical factors10.1149/1.1838615 ↗
6. Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines–A review10.1016/j.corsci.2007.06.006 ↗
7. Galvanic corrosion of high alloy stainless steels in sea water10.1179/000705994798268033 ↗
8. PLIDCO, Split+Sleeve: Permanently repairs a variety of pipelines, Ohio, USA.
9. Gibson · 2003
10. Effectiveness of using fibre-reinforced polymer composites for underwater steel pipeline repairs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.019 ↗
11. C. Alexander, B. Francini, State of the Art Assessment of Composite Systems Used to Repair Transmission Pipelines, International Pipeline Conference, ASME, Calgary, Alberta, 2006, pp. 823-830.10.1115/IPC2006-10484 ↗
12. The flexible grouted clamp-a novel approach to emergency pipeline repair, Rio Pipeline Conference & Exposition
13. Vu · 2011
14. Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001 ↗
15. Effectiveness of composite repairs applied to damaged pipeline, Experimental Techniques10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00243.x ↗
16. D. Peguero, Testing and Design of Nonmetallic Composite Repair Systems for Pipeline Integrity, CORROSION 2017, NACE International, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2017, p. 15.10.5006/C2017-09506 ↗
17. Characterisation of mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy grouts for composite repair of steel pipelines10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.068 ↗
18. Alexander · 2007
19. Analytical solution for stress, strain and plastic instability of pressurized pipes with volumetric flaws10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.11.002 ↗
20. Stress-based design of pipelines10.1002/9781119019213.ch05 ↗
21. Strand7 Software: Finite element analysis system, Strand7 Pvt. Ltd., Sydney, Australia, 2005.
22. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries - composite repairs of pipework - qualification and design, installation, testing and inspection, ISO/TS 24817, London, 2006.
23. A.S.o.M. Engineers, Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, ASME B31G, New York, 1991.
24. Qualification of a composite system for pipeline repairs under dry, wet, and water-submerged conditions10.1177/0731684413505009 ↗
25. T.A.S.o.M. Engineers, Repair of pressure equipment and piping, ASME PCC-2, New York, 2006.
26. A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminate in aircraft composite structures10.1007/s00170-017-0096-5 ↗
27. Numerical modelling of pipeline puncture under excavator loading. Part I. Development and validation of a finite element material failure model for puncture simulation10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.08.003 ↗
28. Commercial applications and property requirements for epoxies in construction
29. H.S.d.C. Mattos, L.M. Paim, J.M.L. Reis, Analysis of burst tests and long-term hydrostatic tests in produced water pipelines, Eng. Fail. Anal. 22 (2012) 128-140.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.01.011 ↗
30. Repairing Internal Corrosion Defects in Pipelines - A Case Study