Learning from failures: Accidents of marine structures on Norwegian continental shelf over 40 years time period
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates accidents, major accidents and disasters which occurred on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) over a period of more than 40 years time (1972-2013). An accident investigation based on the system life-cycle was applied on the data provided by the World Offshore Accident Database (WOAD) where the operation (in-service) stage of the life-cycle was found to be the stage with 96% and the installation stage with 4% of accident occurrences. The marine operations linked to both installation and the operation (in-service) stages are identified to be where 13% of accidents had occurred. In terms of structural types, jackets and semi-submersibles are identified with the highest number of accidents, while the highest rate of accidents per marine structure type is linked to the concrete structures where in average 5.5 accidents per each concrete structures were recorded. 1980 was the year with the highest number of fatalities on NCS within 40 years time span with the occurrence of Alexander L. Kielland disaster. There has been a reduction of number of fatalities over the years, but injuries had always been present. It was found that possible correlations can be established among occurrence of accidents and environmental loads for some months. The results and discussions contributes to learning from the 40 years accidents on the NCS with the aim of risk reduction in operation of marine structures. The predictive and preventive maintenance strategy and condition monitoring during operation (in-service) stage for each individual marine structure is promoted. However, the uncertainty is still present and risk can never be reduced to zero.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Oil and Gas Production Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, 2018, Health, Safety and Environment in the petroleum industry, Meld.st.12 (2017–2018), Report to the Storting (White paper), https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/258cadcb3cca4e3c87c858fd787e0f75/en-gb/pdfs/stm201720180012000engpdfs.pdf//, [Online; accessed 5-August-2019].
2. Norwegian Petroleum, 2019, Norway’s petroleum history, https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/framework/norways-petroleum-history/, [Online; accessed 05-June-2019].
3. Norwegian Petroleum, 2019, Production forecasts, https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/production-and-exports/production-forecasts//, [Online; accessed 25-July-2019].
4. KonKraft, 2016, North and the Norwegian Continental Shelf – Introduction, summary and recommendations, Report 2016-1, KonKraft, http://konkraft.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Konkraftrapport_eng_fullversjon.pdf//, [Online; accessed 5-Jan-2019].
5. Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, Norway, 2014, Facts 2014, The Norwegian Petroleum Sector, https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/oed/pdf_filer_2/faktaheftet/fakta2014og/facts_2014_nett_.pdf, [Online; accessed 21-Jan-2019].
6. Life cycle structural integrity management of offshore structures10.1080/15732479.2018.1438478 ↗
7. Petroleum Safety Authority, 2013, Significant stories, http://www.psa.no/articles-in-safety-status-and-signals-2012-2013/significant-stories-article9119-1095.html, [Online; accessed 12-Sep-2018].
8. Engineering risks and failure: lessons-learned from environmental disasters10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000199 ↗
9. Trends in application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes10.1016/S0967-0661(97)00053-1 ↗
10. A. Sadek, A guide to failure analysis for the oil and gas industry, https://ewi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Sadek-Guide-to-Fialure-Analysis-for-OG-Industry-R2.pdf, [Online; accessed 12-Oct-2019] (2016).
11. Petroleum Safety Authority, 2016, TRENDS IN RISK LEVEL IN THE PETROLEUM ACTIVITY, SUMMARY REPORT 2016 THE NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF, http://www.ptil.no/summary-report-2016/category1264.html, [Online; accessed 03-Dec-2018].
12. Petroleum Safety Authority, 2019, The Norwegian Continental Shelf 2018, Trends in risk level in the petroleum activity, Summary report, https://www.ptil.no/contentassets/c73558c7413743e69f9054be74c836c0/sammendragsrapp_2018_rev1d_en.pdf, [Online; accessed 21-July-2019].
13. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 2010, Determined to learn from history, Norwegian Continental Shelf 1, http://www.npd.no/en/Publications/Norwegian-Continental-Shelf/No1-2010/Determined-to-learn-from-history/, [Online; accessed 15-Nov-2018].
14. M. Ibrion, Earthquake culture: A significant element in earthquake disaster risk assessment and earthquake disaster risk management, in: V. Svalova (Ed.), Risk Assessment, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2018, Ch. 3.10.5772/intechopen.70434 ↗
15. M. Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, The earthquake disaster risk in Japan and Iran and the necessity of dynamic learning from large earthquake disasters over time, in: V. Svalova (Ed.), Earthquakes-Forecast, Prognosis and Earthquake Resistant Construction, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2018, Ch. 2.10.5772/intechopen.76014 ↗
16. Petroleum Safety Authority, 2014, Causal relationships and measures associated with structural and maritime incidents on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, chapter 10 of the Main Report RNNP 2013, http://www.ptil.no/getfile.php/1329219/, [Online; accessed 21-Dec-2018].
17. Christou · 2012
18. Offshore Risk Assessment
19. Haugen · 2011
20. M. Smith-Solbakken, Bravo-ulykken (in Norwegian), https://snl.no/Bravo-ulykken, [Online; accessed 10-Sep-2018] (2018).
21. M. Smith-Solbakken, J. Vinnem, West Vanguard-ulykken, (in Norwegian), https://snl.no/West_Vanguard-ulykken, [Online; accessed 10-Sep-2018] (2018).
22. M. Smith-Solbakken, E. Dahle, Alexander L. Kielland-ulykken (in Norwegian), https://snl.no/Alexander_L._Kielland-ulykken, [Online; accessed 10-Sep-2018] (2018).10.18261/issn.2387-5879-2019-01-11 ↗
23. M. Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, A. Nejad, On disaster risk reduction in Norwegian oil and gas industry through life-cycle perspective, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2019 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering, OMAE 2019, June 09-14, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 2019.
24. M. Faber, Risk assessment and decision making in civil engineering, AMAS course reliability-based optimization, RBO’02, Warsaw, 23–25 September, 2002.
25. Moan · 2003
26. Main bearings in large offshore wind turbines: development trends, design and analysis requirements
27. Towards a new approach for the identification of atypical accident scenarios10.1080/13669877.2012.729518 ↗
28. DNVGL, DNVGL-ST-N001 Marine operations and marine warranty, DNVGL, 2018.
29. Norwegian Petroleum, 2019, Historical timeline of some important fields, https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/interactive-map-quick-downloads/quick-downloads/, [Online; accessed 15-Sep-2019].
30. L. Carl Martin, Olje og gassutvinning til havs
31. DNV-GL, 2018, World Offshore Accident Database, WOAD, https://www.dnvgl.com/services/world-offshore-accident-database-woad-1747, [Online; accessed 5-June-2019].
32. DNV-GL, 2018, Whitepaper WOAD, World Offshore Accident Databank, https://www.dnvgl.com/services/world-offshore-accident-database-woad-1747, [Online; accessed 25-Nov-2019].
33. Norwegian Petroleum, 2019, The Petroleum act and the licensing system, https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/framework/the-petroleum-act-and-the-licensing-system/, [Online; accessed 15-June-2019].
34. Norwegian Petroleum, 2019, Activity per sea area, Areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/developments-and-operations/activity-per-sea-area//, [Online; accessed 5-June-2019].
35. F. Vicente, Failure analysis in the oil and gas industry, https://inspectioneering.com/journal/2013-12-18/3719/failure-analysis-in-the-oil-ga, [Online; accessed 10-Oct-2019] (2013).
36. Accounting for uncertainty and variability in geotechnical characterization of offshore sites
37. Leveson · 2011
38. T. Moan, The Alexander L. Kielland accident – 30 years later, What did we learn- and apply and What should we not forget?, CeSOS, NTNU, Norway, https://www.scribd.com/document/37963626/Alexander-L-Kielland-ulykken-30-%C3%A5r-etter-Torgeir-Moan-NTNU//, [Online; accessed 20-July-2019] (2010).
39. M. Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, A. Nejad, On risk of digital twin implementation in marine industry: Learning from aviation industry, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1357, IOP Publishing, 2019, pp. 012009.10.1088/1742-6596/1357/1/012009 ↗
40. PSA, 2019, About the regulations, https://www.ptil.no/en/regulations/acts/about-the-regulations/, [Online; accessed 12-Sep-2019].
41. GL Noble Denton, 2010, Review and Comparison of Petroleum Safety Regulatory Regimes for the Commission for Energy Regulation, Report no.AA/73-01-01/03s, https://www.extractiveshub.org/servefile/getFile/id/1596, [Online; accessed 15-Sept-2019].