The effect of the width to length ratios of corrosion defects on the burst pressures of transmission pipelines
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper deals with the investigation of the load carrying capacity of transmission steel pipelines in case of occurrence of corrosion defects on the outer surface of the pipe wall. Different including dimensions of the corrosion metal loss (length, width, depth) influence the burst pressure of the corroded pipelines to a different extent. The effects of the width to length ratios of the corrosion defects were investigated with numerical simulations included in this article. The calculations were performed with FEA (Finite Element Analysis) method and the results were verified based on measurement data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Structural integrity evaluation of X52 gas pipes subjected to external corrosion defects using the SINTAP procedure10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.02.023 ↗
2. American Society of Mechanical Engineer. Manual for remaining strength of corroded pipelines. ANSI/ASME B31.G, 1991.
3. Kiefner J, Vieth P. A modified criterion for evaluating the strenght of corroded pipe. Final report for PR 3-805 project to the Pipeline Supervisory Committee of the American Gas Association, Battelle, Ohio; 1989.10.55274/R0011347 ↗
4. Recommended Practice, DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV-RP-F101, Corroded Pipelines, 2004.
5. Fu B, Batte A. An overview of advanced methods for the assessment of corrosion in linepipe. Offshore Technology Report – OTO 1999 051. August 1999.
6. Vieth PH, Kiefner JF. RSTRENG user’s manual. Pipeline Research Supervisory Committee. American Gas Association; 1993.
7. Probabilistic calibrated design equation for burst strength assessment of corroded pipelines
8. Critical crack sizes in ductile piping10.1016/0308-0161(81)90002-8 ↗
9. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe part ii: alternative criterion
10. Anon: bulletin on formulas and calculations for casing, tubing, drill pipe, and line pipe properties. API Bulletin 5C3, 6th ed., October 1994.
11. Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: numerical studies and verification analysis10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.011 ↗
12. John F. Kiefner. Role of hydrostatic testing in pipeline integrity assessment, Northeast Pipeline Integrity Workshop, Albany, New York, 2001.
13. Stress and strain analysis of pipelines with localized metal loss10.1007/s11340-006-9826-6 ↗
14. Ductile failure analysis of API X65 pipes with notch-type defects using a local fracture criterion10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.03.002 ↗
15. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X ↗
16. Structural integrity assessments of high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using a micromechanics model10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.04.004 ↗
17. Evaluation of the effect of corrosion defects on the structural integrity of X52 gas pipelines using the SINTAP procedure and notch theory10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.10.005 ↗
18. The compressibility of thirty metals as a function of pressure and temperature10.2307/20025987 ↗
19. Schlumberger: Well Integrity, www.schlumberger.com, May 2004.
20. Fekete G, Varga L. Extension of pit corrosion effect on pipelines. Periodica Polytechnica, in press.
21. Belytschko · 2003