journal article·2024-12

A case study comparing seismic retrofitting techniques for a historically significant masonry building’s minaret

Adnan Kiral, Mustafa Ergün, Zeliha Tonyali, Musa Artar, İdris Şentürk

Publisher page

Abstract

Historical masonry structures are extremely susceptible to earthquakes due to their characteristic features. Seismic performance and corresponding damage patterns vary between these buildings. Even though the main structure was undamaged, many minarets suffered damage or collapsed due to the transmission of large forces from the main mass to the minaret and the abrupt changes in cross-section due to the geometry of the minaret. This study uses an ancient masonry mosque as a case study, whose minaret and main building are constructed as a single structure. The mosque's minaret under seismic excitation is the focus of this study. The adopted model is called Alaeddin Bey Mosque in Mus,, T & uuml;rkiye. The seismic performance assessment of the minaret, considering various retrofitting options, is mainly based on four critical parameters: base shear, acceleration, displacement, and maximum tensile forces in all three dimensions. The analyzed retrofitting methods include base isolation located in the basement of the mosque, viscous dampers placed only in the upper part of the minaret, Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer fabric fitted to only the minaret, and steel plates applied to only the minaret. Representative structural models of the mosque have been modelled with SAP2000 software. The main novelty of this study is the use of viscous dampers in the minaret. It is the first time a design methodology has been introduced for viscous damper applications in minarets. This methodology aims to prevent local damage to the minaret due to the forces generated by the dampers, while also considering the constraints of limited internal space within the minaret. The finding of this study shows that viscous damper application yields significantly better results compared to the application of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer fabric and steel plates. However, although base isolation reduces the tensile stress values throughout the entire mosque to levels well below the material's strength, viscous damper application in the minaret significantly reduces tensile stresses only in the minaret. As a result, viscous dampers are recommended for damage reduction in the minaret only. Otherwise, base isolation should be considered for reducing stress values throughout the entire mosque including the minaret. This study contributes towards the development of new seismic retrofitting methods for historic masonry buildings 'minaret.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (99)

Show source-provided references
1. GOM. “Governorship of Muş.” http://www.mus.gov.tr/ (accessed 08.07.2024.
2. Seismic behavior assessment of historical Alaeddin Bey Mosque and strengthening suggestions by CFRP fabric and steel plate10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106242 ↗
3. Effectiveness of seismic retrofitting of a historical masonry structure: Kütahya Kurşunlu Mosque, Turkey10.1007/s10518-019-00603-6 ↗
4. Structural performance of the Esfahan Shah mosque10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003108 ↗
5. Seismic assessment of Romanian Orthodox masonry churches in the Banat area through a multi-level analysis framework10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107539 ↗
6. Joint stiffness influence on the first-order seismic capacity of dry-joint masonry structures: numerical DEM investigations10.3390/app12042108 ↗
7. Dynamic analyses of experimentally-updated FE model of historical masonry clock towers using site-specific seismic characteristics and scaling parameters according to the 2018 Turkey building earthquake code10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.054 ↗
8. Interdisciplinary study of dynamic behavior and earthquake response of Hagia Sophia10.1016/0267-7261(94)00031-B ↗
9. Historical masonry building aggregates: advanced numerical insight for an effective seismic assessment on two row housing compounds10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.025 ↗
10. Failure surfaces for common brickwork settings used in historical masonry structures10.1080/15583058.2016.1158332 ↗
11. Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures10.1007/s10518-008-9066-5 ↗
12. Dynamic response of a reinforced concrete minaret10.31462/jseam.2018.01062072 ↗
13. Seismic damage evaluation of historical structures during Van earthquake, October 23, 201110.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.030 ↗
14. Simple nonlinear numerical modeling for unreinforced and FRP-reinforced masonry domes10.3390/buildings14010166 ↗
15. Mechanical characterization of “Scaglia Rossa” stone masonry through experimental and numerical analyses10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124572 ↗
16. Modeling strategies for the computational analysis of unreinforced masonry structures: review and classification10.1007/s11831-019-09351-x ↗
17. Nonlinear modeling of the seismic response of masonry structures: critical review and open issues towards engineering practice10.1007/s10518-021-01263-1 ↗
18. Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
19. Estimation of seismic damage propagation in a historical masonry minaret
20. Seismic performance of the St. George of the Latins church: Lessons learned from studying masonry ruins10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.003 ↗
21. Damage assessment and collapse investigation of three historical masonry palaces under seismic actions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.066 ↗
22. Multilevel structural evaluation and rehabilitation design of an historic masonry fortress
23. Assessment of structural behaviour and seismic retrofitting for an Italian monumental masonry building
24. ERMGHS, Earthquake Risk Management Guide for Historic Structures, (2017)/ (accessed December 20, 2021). 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipkb.gov.tr/e-kutuphane/tarihi-yapilar-icin-deprem-risklerinin-yonetimi-kilavuzu_111/.
25. Application of SRP composite sheets for retrofitting reinforced concrete beams: Cracking and tension stiffening10.1177/0731684409357799 ↗
26. Flexural behaviour of reinforced or prestressed concrete beams including strengthening with prestressed carbon fibre reinforced polymer sheets: application of a fracture mechanics approach10.1139/l06-161 ↗
27. da Silva · Probabilistic-Based Discrete Model for the Seismic Fragility Assessment of Masonry Structures · 2023 · vol. 52 · 506
28. Vertical strong ground motion effects on seismic damage propagations of historical masonry rectangular minarets10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.029 ↗
29. Dynamic response of traditional and buttressed reinforced concrete minarets10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.002 ↗
30. Assessment and rehabilitation of the damaged historic Cenabı Ahmet Pasha Mosque10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.015 ↗
31. Investigation on seismic isolation retrofit of a historical masonry structure
32. M. Yurdakul, F. Yılmaz, M. Artar, Ö. Can, E. Öner, and A. T. Daloğlu, Investigation of time-history response of a historical masonry minaret under seismic loads, Structures, vol. 30, pp. 265-276, 2021 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.008.10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.008 ↗
33. K. Guo, G. Milani, Investigation of advanced seismic base isolation system using different shaped steel dampers, 2023, vol. 2849: AIP Publishing, 1 ed.10.1063/5.0162142 ↗
34. Numerical assessment of cracks on a freestanding masonry minaret10.1080/15583058.2019.1629046 ↗
35. A new damage factor for seismic assessment of deficient bare and FRP-retrofitted RC structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113152 ↗
36. A novel stochastic linearization technique for structures with nonlinear fluid viscous dampers including soil-structure interaction
37. ICOMOS, International Council on Monuments and Sites, Principles for the Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of Arch. Heritage / 2003, https://www.icomos.org.tr/?Sayfa=Icomostuzukleri&dil=en (accessed 11.07.2024.
38. P. Roca, The study and restoration of historical structures: from principles to practice, Struct. Anal. Historical Construct., pp. 9-24, 2006.
39. H. Erkek, M. Yetkin, Assessment of the performance of a historic minaret during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6), Structures, vol. 58, p. 105620, 2023/12/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105620.10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105620 ↗
40. The effect of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on historical masonry mosques and minarets10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107225 ↗
41. B. Atmaca, E. Ertürk Atmaca, B. Roudane, O. Güleş, E. Demirkaya, B. Aykanat, A. C. Altunişik, M. Günaydin, M. E. Arslan, V. Kahya, Field Observations and Numerical Investigations on Seismic Damage Assessment of RC and Masonry Minarets During the February 6th, 2023, Kahramanmaraş (Mw 7.7 Pazarcık and Mw 7.6 Elbistan) Earthquakes in Türkiye, Int. J. Architect. Heritage, pp. 1-26, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2024.2337651.10.1080/15583058.2024.2337651 ↗
42. An architectural review of the behavior of historical masonry minarets under earthquake load on mosque samples damaged in the 6 February Kahramanmaraş Earthquake
43. Collapse mechanism of historical masonry mosques under strong ground motions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106983 ↗
44. A. Soyluk, M.E. Tuna, Sismik taban izolasyonu uygulaması için tarihi Şehzade Mehmet Camisinin dinamik analizi (in Turkish), Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 3, 2011.
45. Base isolation for retrofitting historic buildings: Evaluation of seismic performance through experimental investigation10.1002/eqe.54 ↗
46. A. B. Habieb, M. Valente, G. Milani, Base seismic isolation of a historical masonry church using fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators, Soil Dynamics Earthquake Eng., vol. 120, pp. 127-145, 2019/05/01/ 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.022.10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.022 ↗
47. A. B. Habieb, M. Valente, G. Milani, Implementation of a simple novel Abaqus user element to predict the behavior of unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators in macro-scale computations, Bull. Earthquake Eng., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2741-2766, 2019/05/01 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00544-6.10.1007/s10518-018-00544-6 ↗
48. A study on experimental shear behavior of fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators with various fiber layouts, elastomers and aging conditions10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.034 ↗
49. M. Pauletta, D. Di Luca, E. Russo, C. Fumo, Seismic rehabilitation of cultural heritage masonry buildings with unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators (U-FREIs) – A case of study, J. Cult. Heritage, vol. 32, pp. 84-97, 2018/07/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.09.015.10.1016/j.culher.2017.09.015 ↗
50. Hybrid seismic base isolation of a historical masonry church using unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators and shape memory alloy wires10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109281 ↗
51. Seismic Response of a Historic Masonry Construction Isolated by Stable Unbonded Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators (SU-FREI)10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.628.160 ↗
52. Dynamic response of masonry minarets strengthened with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites10.5194/nhess-11-2011-2011 ↗
53. Enhancing seismic resilience: a proposed reinforcement technique for historical minarets10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107832 ↗
54. Seismic retrofitting of Mustafa Pasha Mosque in Skopje: finite element analysis10.1080/13632469.2010.532580 ↗
55. Strengthening techniques for masonry domes: A review10.1177/09560599221126652 ↗
56. Nonlinear modelling of curved masonry structures after seismic retrofit through FRP reinforcing10.3390/buildings7030079 ↗
57. AFAD. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Türkiye, Seismic Hazard Map, 2024 [Online] Available: https://www.afad.gov.tr/turkiye-deprem-tehlike-haritasi.
58. PEER. Peer Ground Motion Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2024 [Online] Available: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
59. Seismosoft, Earthquake Engineering Software Products, V2024,. (2024). [Online]. Available: https://seismosoft.com.
60. L. Al Atik, N. Abrahamson, An Improved Method for Nonstationary Spectral Matching, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 601-617, 2010/08/01 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3459159.10.1193/1.3459159 ↗
61. Code · 2018
62. Seismosoft, Earthquake Engineering Software Products, V2024. (2024). [Online]. Available: https://seismosoft.com.
63. Kulağuz · 1997
64. İ. Şentürk, Tarihi Alaeddin Bey Camisinin deprem davranışının belirlenmesi ve farklı güçlendirme tekniklerinin araştırılması, MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering Bayburt University, Graduate Education Institues, 2021.
65. Seismic behavior and damage assessment of two historical fortified masonry palaces with corner towers10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106003 ↗
66. Seismic vulnerability assessment and earthquake response of slender historical masonry bell towers in South-East Lombardia10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105656 ↗
67. Seismic risk assessment of historic masonry towers: comparison of four case studies10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001039 ↗
68. Case study: seismic retrofitting of a medieval bell tower with FRP10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:3(319) ↗
69. Earthquake response and damage patterns assessment of two historical masonry churches with bell tower10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107418 ↗
70. Investıgatıon of Structural Behaviour of Historical Erzurum Lala Pasha Mosque using Finite Element Method
71. A plastic-damage model for concrete10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
72. Numerical modeling of a majestic masonry structure: A comparison of advanced techniques10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107293 ↗
73. L. C. M. da Silva, G. Milani, A FE-Based Macro-Element for the Assessment of Masonry Structures: Linear Static, Vibration, and Non-Linear Cyclic Analyses, Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, doi: 10.3390/app12031248.10.3390/app12031248 ↗
74. A. Ferrante, E. Giordano, F. Clementi, G. Milani, A. Formisano, FE vs. DE modeling for the nonlinear dynamics of a historic church in Central Italy, Geosciences, vol. 11, no. 5, doi: 10.3390/geosciences11050189.10.3390/geosciences11050189 ↗
75. M. Schiavoni, E. Giordano, F. Roscini, F. Clementi, Numerical assessment of interacting structural units on the seismic damage: a comparative analysis with different modeling approaches, Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, doi: 10.3390/app13020972.10.3390/app13020972 ↗
76. Earthquake-induced damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms of an Italian Medieval castle10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.008 ↗
77. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
78. Investigation of the structural performance of a masonry domed mosque by experimental tests and numerical analysis10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.335 ↗
79. M.G. Oesterle, Use of incremental dynamic analysis to assess the performance of steel moment-resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers, MSc Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2003.
80. Damages of minarets during Erciş and Edremit earthquakes, 2011 in Turkey10.12989/sss.2014.14.3.479 ↗
81. Geotechnical and structural damages caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman)10.3390/app14052165 ↗
82. The seismic response evaluation of an existing multi-span reinforced concrete highway bridge in the presence of linear and nonlinear viscous dampers
83. Seismic performance assessment of steel buildings equipped with a new semi-active displacement-dependent viscous damper10.1142/S1793431124500222 ↗
84. The effect of LRB stiffness changes with and without supplemental viscous dampers on seismic responses of an experimentally verified MDOF building
85. Taylor Devices Inc., Viscous damper modeling design guide, general guidelines for engineers including a brief history, (accessed 2023).
86. Seismic rehabilitation of historical masonry buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.033 ↗
87. https://it.mathworks.com/help/matlab/. Accessed Feb 2024.
88. Residual seismic load capacity of fire-damaged rubber bearings of r.c. base-isolated buildings10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.011 ↗
89. Effect of LRB isolators and supplemental viscous dampers on seismic isolated buildings under near-fault excitations10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.020 ↗
90. Seismic performance limit of nuclear power plant piping system with seismic isolation system considering measurement points: Low-cycle fatigue life
91. Seismic response of base-isolated buildings: exploring isolator properties
92. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, 0784404453, ASCE, 2017.
93. Arfen Ltd. https://arfen.com.tr/katalog (accessed June 2024.
94. Second-mode tuned mass dampers in base-isolated structures for reduction of floor acceleration10.1002/eqe.3097 ↗
95. Effects of mechanical property variability in lead rubber bearings on the response of seismic isolation system for different ground motions10.5516/NET.09.2014.718 ↗
96. Probabilistic seismic analysis of base isolated buildings considering near and far field earthquake ground motions10.1080/15732479.2020.1836000 ↗
97. Application of seismic isolation in the retrofit of historical buildings10.2495/ERES110041 ↗
98. Seismic performance assessment of steel buildings equipped with a new semi-active displacement-dependent viscous damper10.1142/S1793431124500222 ↗
99. Possibilities and limitations of innovative retrofitting for masonry churches: advanced computations on three case studies10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.075 ↗