journal article·2025-03Open access

Few-shot learning for estimating gear wear severity towards digital twinning

Roee Cohen, Lior Bachar, Omri Matania, Jacob Bortman

Abstract

• Hybrid physical-AI strategy for gear wear monitoring. • A few-shot learning-based regressor for wear severity estimation. • Extensive controlled-degradation experiments of gear wear. • Simulation of gear vibrations through dynamic modeling and domain adaptation. Digital twins hold the potential to revolutionize gear health monitoring by leveraging dynamic modeling and AI advancements, providing real-time insights and enabling proactive maintenance. Wear is one of the most critical fault mechanisms in gears, yet vibration-based gear diagnosis has mainly progressed for localized tooth faults due to the complexities associated with distributed wear. This study proposes a novel strategy for gear wear monitoring aligning with digital twins’ foundations, by integrating experiments, dynamic modeling, physical preprocessing, and machine learning. First, we propose an unsupervised learning-based sensitive health indicator for early wear detection, grounded in advanced physical preprocessing. Then, we introduce a novel few-shot learning approach for estimating wear severity, addressing the scarcity of labeled faulty measured data in real-world scenarios. We train a severity regressor using an extensive simulated training dataset, augmented and adapted to the inspected gear through transfer function estimation. The few-shot learning framework relies on measured training data, which includes healthy samples and a few faulty samples from a one label. The transfer of knowledge between the simulated and measured training datasets enables the severity regressor to make predictions on unseen measured data. The proposed strategy is demonstrated through controlled-degradation tests in gear wear, showcasing its superior performance in both fault detection and severity estimation, comparable to that of a fully supervised model, as if labeled measured data were available. Above all, this study highlights how a synergy between physics-based and AI-based approaches enhances performance while addressing practical challenges in wear diagnosis, paving the way for the implementation of digital twins in future endeavors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Digital twin-driven intelligent assessment of gear surface degradation10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109896 ↗
2. Deep digital twins for detection, diagnostics and prognostics10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106612 ↗
3. Predictive maintenance using digital twins: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008 ↗
4. The digital twin in Industry 4.0: A wide-angle perspective10.1002/qre.2948 ↗
5. Digital Twin for rolling bearings: a review of current simulation and PHM techniques10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111728 ↗
6. Gear fault models and dynamics-based modelling for gear fault detection – a review10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104798 ↗
7. Dynamic modeling of gearbox faults: A review10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.05.024 ↗
8. Condition monitoring of ball bearings based on machine learning with synthetically generated data10.3390/s22072490 ↗
9. Deep convolutional generative adversarial network with semi-supervised learning enabled physics elucidation for extended gear fault diagnosis under data limitations10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109772 ↗
10. Dynamic modeling of spur gear transmission system with evolutive coupling fault of fatigue crack and wear10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107820 ↗
11. Research on the variation of mesh stiffness and transmission error for spur gear with tooth profile modification and wear fault10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105184 ↗
12. Use of an improved vibration-based updating methodology for gear wear prediction10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105066 ↗
13. A systematic literature review of deep learning for vibration-based fault diagnosis of critical rotating machinery: limitations and challenges10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118562 ↗
14. Few-shot learning approaches for fault diagnosis using vibration data: a comprehensive review10.3390/su152014975 ↗
15. One-fault-shot learning for fault severity estimation of gears that addresses differences between simulation and experimental signals and transfer function effects10.1016/j.aei.2023.101945 ↗
16. A novel hybrid physical AI-based strategy for fault severity estimation in spur gears with zero-shot learning10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110748 ↗
17. Eugene E. Shipley, GEAR FAILURES, Penton Publishing Co., Cleveland, 1967. https://www.xtek.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/xtek-gear-failures.pdf.
18. A review of vibration-based gear wear monitoring and prediction techniques10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109605 ↗
19. Use of transmission error for a quantitative estimation of root-crack severity in gears10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108957 ↗
20. Automated assessment of gear wear mechanism and severity using mould images and convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106280 ↗
21. Gear pitting severity level identification using binary segmentation methodology10.1002/stc.2478 ↗
22. A review on data-driven fault severity assessment in rolling bearings10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.012 ↗
23. Latest developments in gear defect diagnosis and prognosis: a review10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107735 ↗
24. A novel evolution model of pitting failure and effect on time -varying meshing stiffness of spur gears10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105068 ↗
25. A novel vibration-based prognostic scheme for gear health management in surface wear progression of the intelligent manufacturing system10.1016/j.wear.2023.204697 ↗
26. Transmission-error- and vibration-based condition monitoring of gear wear with contaminated lubricant10.1016/j.wear.2023.204760 ↗
27. Monitoring gear wear with transmission error10.1016/j.wear.2023.204803 ↗
28. A life-cycle dynamic wear degradation model of planetary gear systems
29. P.J. Dempsey, Integrating oil debris and vibration measurements for intelligent machine health monitoring - ProQuest, (n.d.). https://www.proquest.com/docview/305481639?fromopenview=true&pq-origsite=gscholar&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses (accessed January 6, 2025).
30. Wear pattern and debris analysis in gearbox system10.1007/s11668-021-01220-9 ↗
31. Classification of stages of wear in spur gears based on wear debris morphology10.36001/phme.2020.v5i1.1239 ↗
32. A. Hämäläinen, Generalization of a few-shot model for gear fault diagnosis, (2023). https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/120279 (accessed January 6, 2025).
33. Generalizing from a few examples: a survey on few-shot learning
34. Few-shot transfer learning for intelligent fault diagnosis of machine10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108202 ↗
35. DC-NNMN: across components fault diagnosis based on deep few-shot learning
36. A novel deep convolution multi-adversarial domain adaptation model for rolling bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110752 ↗
37. Parameter sharing adversarial domain adaptation networks for fault transfer diagnosis of planetary gearboxes10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107936 ↗
38. Rotating machinery fault detection and diagnosis based on deep domain adaptation: a survey10.1016/j.cja.2021.10.006 ↗
39. Simulation-driven domain adaptation for rolling element bearing fault diagnosis10.1109/TII.2021.3103412 ↗
40. Machinery fault diagnosis based on domain adaptation to bridge the gap between simulation and measured signals10.1109/TIM.2022.3180416 ↗
41. Dynamic modeling of distributed wear-like faults in spur gears: simplified approach with experimental validation10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4127 ↗
42. Towards better benchmarking using the CWRU bearing fault dataset10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108732 ↗
43. A realistic dynamic model for gear fault diagnosis10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.012 ↗
44. Oppenheim · Discrete-Time Signal Processing · 1999
45. Removal of transfer function effects from transmission error measurements using cepstrum-based operational modal analysis10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108324 ↗
46. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017 ↗
47. The effects of the operating conditions and tooth fault on gear vibration signature10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107508 ↗
48. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: a review and roadmap10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 ↗
49. A review on diagnostic and prognostic approaches for gears10.1177/1475921720972926 ↗
50. E. Bechhoefer, M. Kingsley, A Review of Time Synchronous Average Algorithms, Annual Conference of the PHM Society 1 (2009). https://www.papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/phmconf/article/view/1666 (accessed January 6, 2025).
51. A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.131 ↗
52. A new method of modeling gear faults
53. Fault diagnosis of gear transmissions via optic fiber bragg grating strain sensors10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108629 ↗
54. Gear health threshold setting based on a probability of false alarm