Effect on RC buildings of 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake doublets and new doctrines for seismic design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Earthquake Detection and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. T. Taymaz, O. Tan, S. Yolsal, Active tectonics of Turkey and surroundings and seismic risk in the Marmara sea region, in: Proceedings of the IWAM04, Mizunami, Japan, 31 March 2004.
2. Seismicity of turkey and real-time seismology applications in determining earthquake hazard10.52114/apjhad.1039670 ↗
3. Field reconnaissance of the October 23, 2011, Van, Turkey, Earthquake: lessons from structural damages10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000532 ↗
4. What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.01.003 ↗
5. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the august 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9 ↗
6. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.005 ↗
7. A reconnaissance study in Izmir (Bornova Plain) affected by October 30, 2020 Samos earthquake10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102465 ↗
8. Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.012 ↗
9. Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake code10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.02.006 ↗
10. Re-examination of damage distribution in Adapazarı: geotechnical considerations10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.002 ↗
11. Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023
12. Building damage from the Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 199910.1023/A:1020035425531 ↗
13. Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010, Kovancılar and Palu (Elazıg) Earthquakes in Turkey10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.001 ↗
14. 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazig) earthquake damages and determination of earthquake parameters in the region
15. Korkmaz H.H., Buildings damages after Elazığ Turkey earthquake on January 24, 202010.1007/s11069-021-04831-5 ↗
16. A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks10.1193/1.2720931 ↗
17. I.E. Bal, Gulay, F.G., S.S. Tezcan, A new approach for the preliminary seismic assessment of RC buildings: P25 scoring method, in: Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.
18. TEC · 1998
19. TEC · 2007
20. TBEC · 2018
21. Ersoy · 2018
22. Shunsuke Otani, Lessons learned from past earthquakes, in: Proceedings of Fourth Turkish National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ankara, Turkey, September 17-19, 1997.
23. Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frame10.1080/13632460109350383 ↗
24. Some lessons learned from post-earthquake damage survey of structures in Bam, Iran earthquake of 200310.1108/02630800510610116 ↗
25. American Museum of Natural History “Anatolian Fault, Turkey, https://www.amnh.org.
26. The Economist, Turkey sits at the crossroads of tectonic plates as well as civilisations, https://www.economist.com/.
27. Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of eastern Anatolia—a young collision zone10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.019.01.01 ↗
28. Crustal structure of a young collision zone: the Arabia-Eurasia collision in northeastern Turkey investigated by magneto telluric data10.1186/s40623-018-0932-3 ↗
29. Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach10.1016/0040-1951(81)90275-4 ↗
30. Characteristic features of the North Anatolian Fault in the eastern Marmara region and its tectonic evolution10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00353-5 ↗
31. Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus10.1029/1999JB900351 ↗
32. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region10.1111/j.1365-246X.1972.tb02351.x ↗
33. Aydindag · 2015
34. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: an interaction-based probability calculation
35. The seismicity of Southeast Anatolian and Vicinity
36. The East Anatolian Fault Zone: seismotectonic setting and spatiotemporal characteristics of seismicity based on precise earthquake locations
37. The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics10.1144/SP372.14 ↗
38. Paleoseismology of the western Sürgü-Misis fault system: East Anatolian Fault, Turkey10.1007/s42990-020-00041-6 ↗
39. The 2023 Pazarcık (Mw=7.8) and Elbistan (Mw=7.6), Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in the Southeast Turkey · 2023
40. A Study of Spatial Distribution of Aftershock Seismicity Parameters (B And P Values) Along the Fault Rupture Zone of 17 August İzmit Earthquake
41. 24 January 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice Earthquake Preliminary Investigation Report, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2020.
42. 29 November 1795 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake, Southern Turkey, Bulletin of the Mineral
43. 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake (Mw=6.8) Field Observations and Evaluation Report, The İnstitute of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey, 2020.
44. METU Technical Report, Preliminary Reconnaissance Report on February 6, 2023, Pazarcık Mw=7.7 and Elbistan Mw=7.6, Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye Earthquakes · 2023
45. USGS, US Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center, World Data Center for Seismology.
46. USGS US Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center, M 6.0 – 5 km NE of Göksun, Turkey.
47. USGS US Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center, M 6.0 – 10 km SE of Doğanşehir, Turkey.
48. F.K. Oz, 50,783 people confirmed dead in Turkey earthquakes, Anadolu Agency, www.aa.com.tr, 22 April 2023.
49. EMSC, European Mediterranean Seismological Centre, 2023.
50. AFAD, Turkish Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, 2023.
51. KOERI B, Bogazici University Kandilli observatory and earthquake research institute regional earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center, 2023.
52. TUIK Turkish Statistical Institute, Survey on Building and Dwelling Characteristics, 2021.
53. A Comparative Investigation of Changing Building Characteristics in Turkey
54. TEC, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas (ABYYHY-75), Government of Republic of Turkey, 1975.
55. 1996 Earthquake Zone Map, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey, 1996.
56. AFAD · 2018
57. Priestley · 2007 · 670 pp.
58. “Performance-Based Seismic Design” Keynote Address
59. Ozmen · 2017
60. Code of technical regulations for the design and construction of buildings in seismic regions
61. Yield state investigation of reinforced concrete frames from a new point of view10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.006 ↗
62. American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures: Asce. Published by American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.
63. Eurocode 8 (EC8), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions, and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2018.
64. NZSEE, The seismic assessment of existing buildings. New Zealand Society for Earthquake 867 Engineering (NZSEE), Wellington, New Zealand, 2017.
65. NRC · 2015
66. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas · 2003
67. A. Carvalho, M.L. Sousa, Análise estatística do catálogo sísmico de Portugal Continental. TechnicalReport n°2/2001 – G3ES. LNEC, Lisbon. Portugal (16) (PDF) Seismic zonation for Portuguese National Annex of Eurocode 8, 2001.
68. Greek Code for Seismic Resistant Structures (EAK 2000) Greece, 2000.
69. Bulgarian National Annex to Eurocode 8 – BDS EN 1998-1 (EC 8-1), 1998.
70. NCh433.Of96 – Earthquake Resistant Design of Buildings, Official Chilean Code, Chile, 1996.
71. Santos · 2020
72. M.H.S. Elawady, Ductility Considerations in Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Building, Master Thesis, School of Technology and Management of the Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal, 2007.
73. Applied Technology Council. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. (ATC3-06), Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, CA, 1978.
74. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454) ↗
75. NEHRP, Recommended Provisions for the development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic Safety, Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
76. Uniform Building Code (UBC-1997), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
77. Egyptian Code for Computation of Loads and Forces in Structural and Building Work (EGC-1993). Housing and Building Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
78. Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200003)29:3<327::AID-EQE907>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
79. Estimation of the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings in Turkey utilizing ambient vibration records10.1080/13632460802013909 ↗
80. Empirical relationships between natural vibration period and height of buildings in Singapore10.1002/eqe.2356 ↗
81. A period-height relationship for newly constructed mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111807 ↗
82. H. Crowley, R. Pinho, Simplified Equations for Estimating the Period of Vibration of Existing Buildings, in: 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, 2006.
83. Analysis of the weightiness of site effects on reinforced concrete (RC) building seismic behaviour: the Adra town example (SE Spain)10.1002/eqe.685 ↗
84. Empirical estimates of dynamic parameters on a large set of European buildings10.1007/s10518-009-9133-6 ↗
85. Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7 ↗
86. Evaluation and considerations about fundamental periods of damaged reinforced concrete buildings10.5194/nhess-13-1903-2013 ↗
87. An evaluation of the 2018 seismic hazard map of turkey on the basis of spectrum intensity
88. Development of a fragility model for the residential building stock in South America10.1193/010716EQS005M ↗
89. A new methodology of the development of seismic fragility curves10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.847 ↗
90. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1459) ↗
91. Displacement-based fragility functions for low-and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings10.1193/1.2084232 ↗
92. S. Uma, H. Ryu, N. Luco, A. Liel, M. Raghunandan, Comparison of Main-Shock and Aftershock Fragility Curves Developed for New Zealand and Us Buildings, in: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16, 2011.
93. Vector fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete frames in Europe
94. V. Silva, H. Crowley, H. Varum, R. Pinho, L. Sousa, Development of a Fragility Model for Moment-frame RC buildings in Portugal, in: 2nd ICVRAM, Liverpool, UK, 2014a.10.1061/9780784413609.054 ↗
95. Earthquake vulnerability of school buildings: probabilistic structural fragility analyses10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.005 ↗
96. Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review
97. The relationship between ground conditions and earthquake effect in Antakya
98. General observations of effects of the 30th September 2009 Padang earthquake, Indonesia10.5459/bnzsee.43.3.143-173 ↗
99. Eurocode 8 · 2004
100. Rapid report of seismic damage to buildings in the 2022 M 6.8 Luding earthquake, China10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100180 ↗