journal article·2011-01

Failure analysis and risk management of a collapsed large wind turbine tower

Jui-Sheng Chou, Wan-Ting Tu

Engineering Failure Analysis· Volume 18· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Developing renewable energy is crucial as nations face the twin threats of global warming and a reduction in energy supplies. Wind turbines are one of the most promising sources of renewable energy in Taiwan. However, on September 28, 2008, Typhoon Jangmi struck Taiwan, bringing strong winds and heavy rainfall that collapsed a wind turbine tower located on the shore of Taichung Harbor. This study provides significant insights into, and lessons learned from, post-disaster inspection into the causes of tower failure during this typhoon. This event represented the first time that a wind turbine in Taiwan that had to be reconstructed after collapsing. To prevent similar accidents, the likely causal mechanisms are examined from the risk management perspective. Data for case analysis are collected from original tower design reports, the tower design code, construction records and documents, historical wind-speed data, structural tower analysis, and intact and fractured bolt material tests. Furthermore, similar accidents in other countries and their causes are reviewed to identify potential risk factors affecting the lifecycle of wind turbines.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Forensic investigation of a sulfate-heaved project in Texas10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(324) ↗
2. Noon · 2000
3. Alec S. Zimmer GRB. John Hancock Center Scaffold Collapse. In: The fourth forensic engineering congress, Cleveland, Ohio; 2006. p. P.97–111.10.1061/40853(217)10 ↗
4. Reliability-based failure cause assessment of collapsed bridge during construction10.1016/j.ress.2005.05.005 ↗
5. Forensic study for causes of fall using fault tree analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2001)15:3(96) ↗
6. Documenting and analyzing construction failures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(8) ↗
7. Forensic engineering: reduction of risk and improving technology (for all things great and small)10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.065 ↗
8. Forensic analysis of a pile foundation failure10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.09.008 ↗
9. Roarty C, Sivak J, Vogel P, Ramachandran KV. South clear well roof collapse: hydraulic uplift or excessive construction loading? In: The fourth forensic engineering congress, Cleveland, Ohio; 2006. p. P.210–24.10.1061/40853(217)18 ↗
10. Gibson R, Allen R, Wilson S, Brunzell W. Lessons learned from failure of a large diameter water pipeline. In: Pipelines congress, Atlanta, GA, United States. Am Soc Civil Eng; 2008.10.1061/40994(321)126 ↗
11. An investigation of fatigue failures of turbine blades in a gas turbine engine by mechanical analysis10.1016/S1350-6307(01)00005-X ↗
12. Failure investigation and condition assessment using field metallography10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.036 ↗
13. Kasap D, Kaymak M. Risk identification step of the project risk management. In: Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology; 2007. p. 2116–20.10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349543 ↗
14. Reducing the risk of failure by better training and education10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.07.006 ↗
15. Owner. Tender documentation: specific clauses; 2003. p. 17–39 [chapter 00810].
16. Owner. Construction specifications; 2002.
17. Manufacturer. Technical document: installation manual, Netherlands; 2005. 27pp.
18. Owner. Construction site inspection checklist; 2006.
19. Contractor. Construction checklist for self-inspection of wind turbine installation; 2005.
20. Manufacturer. Z72-2000-62m Taichung tower design report, Netherlands; 2004. 138 pp.
21. Teasdale · 2008
22. Contractor. Continuous-run record of H01∼H03 wind turbines in Taichung Harbor area, September 22–30, 2008.
23. CWB. Wind speed records, Central Weather Bureau (CWB), ROC; 2008.
24. Subcontractor-P. Certification documents for the tower bolts and nuts; 2005. p. 1–3.
25. Subcontractor-Q. Sample bolts test report; 2005.
26. Pierpont N. Health, hazard, and quality of life near wind power installations – how close is too close? Malone Telegram, New York, USA; 2005. p. 12–7.
27. CWIF. Caithness Windfarm Information Forum; 2008.
28. NWW. National wind watch® (NWW); 2005.
29. Linowes. Industrial Wind Action Group; 2008.
30. JIS. Japanese Industrial Standards, JIS Z2241, Japan; 2000.
31. CNS. Chinese National Standards, CNS2111, G2013, ROC; 1996.
32. TLIRI. Fractured and intact bolt experiment reports, Material Laboratory Yen Tjing Ling Industrial Research Institute (TLIRI), National Taiwan University; 2009.
33. Chen · 2005
34. Failure analysis of transmission towers10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.001 ↗
35. Ministry of the Interior ROC. Specification for building wind resistant design; 2007.
36. MIDAS. Korea: MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd; 2008.
37. Reliability-based fatigue failure analysis for causes assessment of a collapsed steel truss bridge10.1016/S1350-6307(00)00020-0 ↗
38. Examples of FEM application in manufacturing technology10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01210-9 ↗
39. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
40. DIN. Deutsches Institut für Normung. DIN 6914, Germany; 1979.
41. Hazard/risk evaluation – what is it?10.1109/MIAS.2009.932493 ↗
42. Special topic issue – incident investigation10.1205/095758202753502343 ↗
43. Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.013 ↗
44. HSE. HSE human factors briefing note no. 1, Introducing human factors. Health and safety executive.
45. Management’s role in accidents and catastrophic events