journal article·2020-01Open access

An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA

Soumava Boral, Ian Howard, Sanjay K. Chaturvedi, Kristoffer McKee, V.N.A. Naikan

Abstract

Abstract Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a proactive risk assessment technique, which has been widely used by engineers to meet the safety and reliability requirements of processes, products, structures, services, and systems. The major aim of the FMEA technique is to rank the failure modes according to their risk levels and subsequent actions are performed to eliminate/mitigate their consequences. In a typical FMEA, for each failure mode, three risk factors, namely severity (S), occurrence (O) and detection (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is estimated by multiplying these risk factors. In recent years a significant effort has been underway and different approaches have been proposed to improve FMEA, to overcome its several drawbacks. We notice that there is a significant amount of literature based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which have been solely aimed to improve the risk estimation process in FMEA by overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional FMEA technique. In this work, we propose a novel integrated MCDM approach by combining Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) with the modified Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Ideal Real Comparative Analysis (modified FMAIRCA). At first, we calculate the fuzzy relative importance between the risk factors by using the FAHP method and then we use those importance values in our proposed modified FMAIRCA to rank the failure modes according to their risk level. Our modified FMAIRCA method is computationally inexpensive and is able to provide more viable decisions. We consider a benchmark example in FMEA domain to validate the ability of our integrated approach and highlight the usefulness of the same. Further, we compare the ranking result with other MCDM methods - FVIKOR, FCOPRAS, FMOORA, FMABAC, FTOPSIS and sensitivity analysis is also performed to highlight the robustness of the proposed approach.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Risk and Safety Analysis · Evaluation and Optimization Models

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic10.1109/TR.2010.2103672 ↗
2. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis
3. Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS10.1080/0951192X.2013.785027 ↗
4. Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS10.1002/qre.2268 ↗
5. Failure mode and effects analysis by using the house of reliability-based rough VIKOR approach10.1109/TR.2017.2778316 ↗
6. An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.037 ↗
7. Failure detection and optimization of sugar mill boiler using FMEA and Taguchi method10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.12.010 ↗
8. Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.020 ↗
9. Failure mode and effect analysis using cloud model theory and PROMETHEE method10.1109/TR.2017.2754642 ↗
10. Commission · 2006 · 1
11. Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2861719 ↗
12. ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: an alternative to the risk priority number10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.018 ↗
13. Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004 ↗
14. A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.033 ↗
15. New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014 ↗
16. A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018 ↗
18. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 ↗
19. Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: a systematic literature review
20. Failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty: a literature review and tutorial
21. A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning10.1007/s13198-014-0218-5 ↗
22. A novel general risk assessment method using the soft TOPSIS approach10.1080/21681015.2015.1070375 ↗
23. A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: a real-world case10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017 ↗
24. Multi criteria FMECA for coal-fired thermal power plants using COPRAS-G10.1108/IJQRM-04-2013-0068 ↗
25. Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.003 ↗
26. An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty10.1080/0740817X.2016.1172742 ↗
27. Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.engappai.2014.04.011 ↗
28. Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment10.1007/s00500-016-2118-x ↗
29. Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018 ↗
30. An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.008 ↗
31. A hybrid decision making framework for modified failure mode effects and criticality analysis: a case study on process plant induction motors10.1108/IJQRM-08-2018-0213 ↗
32. Satty · 1980
33. The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976 ↗
34. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044 ↗
35. Integrated fuzzy ahp-codas framework for maintenance decision in urea fertilizer industry
36. A two-phase fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation in manufacturing environment
37. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7 ↗
38. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 ↗
39. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 ↗
40. Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model
41. The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots10.3390/su8040372 ↗
42. Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.037 ↗
43. Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R’AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.186 ↗
44. New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506706 ↗
45. Application of interval valued fuzzy-rough numbers in multi-criteria decision making: the ivfrn-mairca model
46. On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050 ↗
47. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques10.1016/0165-0114(95)00166-2 ↗
48. Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.006 ↗
49. The role of façade materials in blast-resistant buildings: an evaluation based on fuzzy delphi and fuzzy EDAS10.3390/a12060119 ↗
50. Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097 ↗
51. Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023 ↗
52. An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.061 ↗
53. A hybrid fuzzy AHP-MABAC model: Application in the Serbian Army-The selection of the location for deep wading as a technique of crossing the river by tanks