Uncertainty quantification and propagation in lithium-ion battery electrodes using bayesian convolutional neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Li-ion battery materials: present and future10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
2. Y. Liu, R. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Current and future lithium-ion battery manufacturing, iScience 24 (2021) 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISCI.2021.102332.10.1016/j.isci.2021.102332 ↗
3. A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials10.1039/c0jm04225k ↗
4. Single-particle model for a lithium-ion cell: thermal behavior10.1149/1.3521314 ↗
5. Multiscale modeling of lithium-ion battery electrodes based on nano-scale X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.134 ↗
6. Effects of three-dimensional cathode microstructure on the performance of lithium-ion battery cathodes10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.104 ↗
7. A verified conformal decomposition finite element method for implicit, many-material geometries10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.022 ↗
8. Mechanical and electrochemical response of a LiCoO2 cathode using reconstructed microstructures10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.224 ↗
9. Electrode fabrication process and its influence in lithium-ion battery performance: state of the art and future trends10.1016/j.elecom.2022.107210 ↗
10. Challenges and opportunities towards fast-charging battery materials10.1038/s41560-019-0405-3 ↗
11. Guiding the design of heterogeneous electrode microstructures for li-ion batteries: microscopic imaging, predictive modeling, and machine learning10.1002/aenm.202003908 ↗
12. Microstructural evolution of battery electrodes during calendering10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.010 ↗
13. Influence of calendering on the electrochemical performance of LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.05 Al 0.05 O 2 cathodes in lithium-ion cells10.1021/acsami.1c12543 ↗
14. Effect of calendering on electrode wettability in lithium-ion batteries10.3389/fenrg.2014.00056 ↗
15. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries via electrode engineering10.1149/1945-7111/ab7fb9 ↗
16. Characterization of the calendering process for compaction of electrodes for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.031 ↗
17. Underpinnings of multiscale interactions and heterogeneities in Li-Ion batteries: electrode microstructure to cell format
18. Investigating electrode calendering and its impact on electrochemical performance by means of a new discrete element method model: towards a digital twin of Li-Ion battery manufacturing10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229320 ↗
19. Revealing hidden predicaments to lithium-ion battery dynamics for electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.014 ↗
20. Probing the influence of multiscale heterogeneity on effective properties of graphite electrodes10.1021/acsami.1c19694 ↗
21. Mesoscale effective property simulations incorporating conductive binder10.1149/2.0601711jes ↗
22. Tool for tortuosity estimation in lithium ion battery porous electrodes10.1149/2.0111502jes ↗
23. Bruggeman's exponents for effective thermal conductivity of lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1149/2.0151602jes ↗
24. Mesoscale effects of composition and calendering in lithium-ion battery composite electrodes
25. X-ray tomography for lithium ion battery electrode characterisation — A review10.1016/j.egyr.2021.02.063 ↗
26. X-ray computed tomography
27. Transition metal oxide based lithium ion battery electrodes10.1002/aenm.201200932 ↗
28. 3D microstructure design of lithium-ion battery electrodes assisted by X-ray nano-computed tomography and modelling
29. The use of contrast enhancement techniques in X-ray imaging of lithium–ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.023 ↗
30. X-ray tomography for battery research and development10.1038/s41578-018-0053-4 ↗
31. Combining operando synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy and scanning X-ray diffraction to study lithium ion batteries
32. X-Ray tomography for lithium ion battery research: a practical guide10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123957 ↗
33. Discrete element method (DEM) analysis of lithium ion battery electrode structures from X-ray tomography-the effect of calendering conditions10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117366 ↗
34. Multiple imaging mode X-ray computed tomography for distinguishing active and inactive phases in lithium-ion battery cathodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.086 ↗
35. Automatic watershed segmentation of randomly textured color images10.1109/83.641413 ↗
36. Classification-driven watershed segmentation10.1109/TIP.2007.894239 ↗
37. Comparisions of robert, prewitt, sobel operator based edge detection methods for real time uses on FPGA
38. An improved Prewitt algorithm for edge detection based on noised image
39. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
40. M. Sezgin, B. Sankur, Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation, 13 (2004) 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1631315.10.1117/1.1631315 ↗
41. Segmentation of X-ray computed tomography images of porous materials: a crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures10.1029/2009WR008087 ↗
42. Observer-dependent variability of the thresholding step in the quantitative analysis of soil images and X-ray microtomography data10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.03.015 ↗
43. Determining the uncertainty in microstructural parameters extracted from tomographic data10.1039/C7SE00498B ↗
44. Quantifying the unknown impact of segmentation uncertainty on image-based simulations10.1038/s41467-021-25493-8 ↗
45. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
46. Quantifying inhomogeneity of lithium ion battery electrodes and its influence on electrochemical performance10.1149/2.0311802jes ↗
47. T. LaBonte, C. Martinez, S.A. Roberts, We know where we don't know: 3d bayesian cnns for credible geometric uncertainty, (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10793.10.2172/1605518 ↗
48. Extraction of morphological quantities from a digitized medium10.1063/1.359134 ↗
49. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050 ↗
50. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen. III. Die elastischen konstanten der quasiisotropen mischkörper aus isotropen substanzen10.1002/andp.19374210205 ↗
51. Secondary-phase stochastics in lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1021/acsami.7b17771 ↗
52. Characterizing the microstructure of separators in lithium batteries and their effects on dendritic growth10.1021/acsaem.1c00144 ↗
53. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023 ↗
54. Validity of the Bruggeman relation for porous electrodes10.1088/0965-0393/21/7/074009 ↗