Carbon-binder-domain porosity extraction through lithium-ion battery electrode impedance data
Source abstract
Abstract
In the field of 3-D resolved computational modeling of Lithium-ion battery electrodes, the arrangement and properties of the Carbon-Binder-Domain (CBD) play a critical role in the ion and electron transport through their impact on the electrode tortuosity factor. However, until now, the CBD porosity value -its main descriptor affecting its transport properties and occupied volume- has been determined through educated guesses due to the lack of an experimental approach. Here, a novel methodology is reported for the determination of the CBD internal porosity through the combination of computational modeling and experimental electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The methodology is based on the creation of a calibration curve that relates tortuosity factor with CBD porosity through digital stochastic generation of electrode microstructures and diffusivity calculations. The curve is then compared to the EIS experimental results and analyzed through a transmission line model, yielding a good estimation of the parameters. In this work, the usefulness and the identified limitation of this approach are demonstrated using three different formulations of LiNi 0.3 Mn 0.3 Co 0.3 O 2 (NMC 111) cathodes. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported method for estimating CBD porosity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Boosting rechargeable batteries R&D by multiscale modeling: myth or reality?10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239 ↗
2. An experimentally-validated 3D electrochemical model revealing electrode manufacturing parameters’ effects on battery performance10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.035 ↗
3. 2024 roadmap for sustainable batteries10.1088/2515-7655/ad6bc0 ↗
4. Roadmap on Li-ion battery manufacturing research10.1088/2515-7655/ac8e30 ↗
5. Investigating electrode calendering and its impact on electrochemical performance by means of a new discrete element method model: Towards a digital twin of Li-Ion battery manufacturing10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229320 ↗
6. Multiscale simulation platform linking lithium ion battery electrode fabrication process with performance at the cell level10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02647 ↗
7. B. Paredes-Goyes, F.M. Zanotto, V. Boudeville, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, A.A. Franco, Mesoscopic model of extrusion during solvent-free lithium-ion battery electrode manufacturing**, batter. Supercaps 7 (2024) e202300441. 10.1002/batt.202300441.10.1002/batt.202300441 ↗
8. Understanding mechanical stresses upon solid-state battery electrode cycling using discrete element method
9. The ARTISTIC battery manufacturing digitalization initiative: from fundamental research to industrialization, Batter
10. Time-dependent deep learning manufacturing process model for battery electrode microstructure prediction
11. Machine learning-assisted multi-objective optimization of battery manufacturing from synthetic data generated by physics-based simulations10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.040 ↗
12. Toward high-performance energy and power battery cells with machine learning-based optimization of electrode manufacturing10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233674 ↗
13. Tortuosity of battery electrodes: validation of impedance-derived values and critical comparison with 3D tomography10.1149/2.0231803jes ↗
14. Generating three-dimensional structures from a two-dimensional slice with generative adversarial network-based dimensionality expansion10.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
15. Secondary-phase stochastics in lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1021/acsami.7b17771 ↗
16. Deconvoluting the impacts of the active material skeleton and the inactive phase morphology on the performance of lithium ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.016 ↗
17. Lithium ion battery electrodes predicted from manufacturing simulations: Assessing the impact of the carbon-binder spatial location on the electrochemical performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
18. Three-phase reconstruction reveals how the microscopic structure of the carbon-binder domain affects ion transport in lithium-ion batteries10.1002/batt.202100057 ↗
19. About the consideration of the inactive materials and the meshing procedures in computational models of lithium ion battery electrodes
20. Mesoscale effects in the extraction of the solid-state lithium diffusion coefficient values of battery active materials: physical insights from 3D modeling10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00517 ↗
21. Holzer · 2023
22. The ARTISTIC online calculator: exploring the impact of lithium-ion battery electrode manufacturing parameters interactively through your browser
23. Experimentally validated three-dimensional modeling of organic-based sodium-ion battery electrode manufacturing
24. Deconvoluting the benefits of porosity distribution in layered electrodes on the electrochemical performance of Li-ion batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.058 ↗
25. Additive manufacturing of Li-ion batteries: a comparative study between electrode fabrication processes10.1002/aenm.202203747 ↗
26. Tortuosity determination of battery electrodes and separators by impedance spectroscopy10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
27. Impact of the manufacturing process on graphite blend electrodes with silicon nanoparticles for lithium-ion batteries
28. Quantifying tortuosity of porous Li-ion battery electrodes: comparing polarization-interrupt and blocking-electrolyte methods10.1149/2.0611811jes ↗
29. Becker · 2024
30. Revealing the rate-limiting electrode of lithium batteries at high rates and mass loadings10.1016/j.cej.2022.138275 ↗
31. Hilden · 2023
32. Drying of lithium-ion battery anodes for use in high-energy cells: influence of electrode thickness on drying time, adhesion, and crack formation10.1002/ente.201900722 ↗
33. Carbon-binder migration: a three-dimensional drying model for lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.015 ↗
34. Tool for tortuosity estimation in lithium ion battery porous electrodes10.1149/2.0111502jes ↗
35. Tortuosity in electrochemical devices: a review of calculation approaches10.1080/09506608.2016.1249995 ↗
36. Critical review of the impact of tortuosity on diffusion10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.041 ↗
37. On the origin and application of the Bruggeman correlation for analysing transport phenomena in electrochemical systems10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006 ↗
38. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und leitfähigkeiten der mischkörper aus isotropen substanzen10.1002/andp.19354160802 ↗
39. Quantifying tortuosity in porous Li-ion battery materials10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.032 ↗
40. Impact of pore tortuosity on electrode kinetics in lithium battery electrodes: study in directionally freeze-Cast LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 (NCA)10.1149/2.1321802jes ↗
41. Carbon binder domain networks and electrical conductivity in lithium-ion battery electrodes: A critical review10.1016/j.rser.2022.112624 ↗
42. Effect of carbon blacks on electrical conduction and conductive binder domain of next-generation lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233916 ↗
43. An invitation to engage with computational modeling: user-friendly tool for in silico battery component generation and meshing10.1002/batt.202100096 ↗
44. Three-dimensional physical modeling of the wet manufacturing process of solid-state battery electrodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233427 ↗