journal article·2024-07-01Open access

Precise structure and energy of group 6 transition metal dichalcogenide homo- and heterobilayers in high-symmetry configurations

Birkan Emrem, Jan-Ole Joswig, Thomas Heine

2D Materials· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Two-dimensional group 6 transition metal dichalcogenide (2D TMDC) bilayers show various high-symmetry stacking configurations, which have also been observed in extended domains formed in their twisted homo- and heterobilayers. The interlayer energy varies for these stacking configurations, and the energy differences determine the relative size of the stacking domains. Therefore, the precise prediction of the composition- and stacking-dependent interlayer energy is crucial to model the domain structure of 2D TMDCs in their twisted bilayer homo- and heterostructures. For the validation of approximate methods that are necessary to tackle these systems encompassing thousands of atoms precise reference data is still lacking. Here, we employ the random phase approximation (RPA) on previously validated SCAN-rVV10 geometries to obtain interaction energies of state-of-the-art accuracy on the six high-symmetry stacking configurations ({H}hh, {H}hM, {H}hX, {R}hh, {R}hM, and {R}hX) of MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = S, Se) bilayers and compare them with the dispersion-corrected density-functional theory (DFT) functionals Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)+D3(BJ), PBE-rVV10L, and SCAN-rVV10. We identify SCAN-rVV10 as most reliable DFT variant with an average deviation of 1.2 meV/atom in relative energies from the RPA reference, and a root mean squared error of less than 2 meV/atom for interlayer interaction energies. We find interlayer distances obtained by PBE+D3(BJ) as being too short, with an impact on the electronic structure, resulting in the incorrect prediction of the band gap character in some cases. A further result of this work is the significant lowering of the interlayer energy and increasing of the interlayer distance in the high-energy stacking configurations. These stackings can be accessible via shear strain and promote exfoliation.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Miró · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 2014 · 53 · 301510.1002/anie.201309280 ↗
2. Kempt · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. · 2020 · 59 · 924210.1002/anie.201914886 ↗
3. Mak · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
4. Splendiani · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
5. Kuc · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 8310.1103/PhysRevB.83.245213 ↗
6. Zhang · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 11110.1038/nnano.2013.277 ↗
7. Arora · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 1042110.1039/C5NR01536G ↗
8. Yu · 2D Mater. · 2018 · 510.1088/2053-1583/aac065 ↗
9. Angeli · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA · 2021 · 11810.1073/pnas.2021826118 ↗
10. Enaldiev · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 12410.1103/PhysRevLett.124.206101 ↗
11. Shabani · Nat. Phys. · 2021 · 17 · 72010.1038/s41567-021-01174-7 ↗
12. Arnold · Mater. Today · 2024 · 73 · 9610.1016/j.mattod.2024.01.012 ↗
13. Arnold · 2D Mater. · 2023 · 1010.1088/2053-1583/aceb75 ↗
14. Nielsen · Phys. Rev. B · 2023 · 10810.1103/physrevb.108.125420 ↗
15. Emrem · Adv. Theory Sims · 2022 · 510.1002/adts.202200055 ↗
16. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
17. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
18. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
19. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
20. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
21. Sun · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 11510.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402 ↗
22. Sabatini · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8710.1103/PhysRevB.87.041108 ↗
23. Hjorth Larsen · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2017 · 2910.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
24. Bohm · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 82 · 62510.1103/PhysRev.82.625 ↗
25. Bohm · Phys. Rev. · 1953 · 92 · 60910.1103/PhysRev.92.609 ↗
26. Gunnarsson · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 427410.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274 ↗
27. Langreth · Solid State Commun. · 1975 · 17 · 142510.1016/0038-1098(75)90618-3 ↗
28. Langreth · Phys. Rev. B · 1977 · 15 · 288410.1103/PhysRevB.15.2884 ↗
29. Pines · Phys. Rev. · 1952 · 85 · 33810.1103/PhysRev.85.338 ↗
30. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. Peng · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 610.1103/PhysRevX.6.041005 ↗
32. Grimme · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 13210.1063/1.3382344 ↗
33. Grimme · J. Comput. Chem. · 2011 · 32 · 145610.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
34. Peng · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 9510.1103/PhysRevB.95.081105 ↗
35. Krukau · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 12510.1063/1.2404663 ↗
36. Huhn · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2017 · 110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.033803 ↗
37. Havu · J. Comput. Phys. · 2009 · 228 · 836710.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008 ↗
38. Ren · New J. Phys. · 2012 · 1410.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053020 ↗
39. Blum · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 217510.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 ↗
40. Naik · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 12110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.266401 ↗
41. Hernandez · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 56310.1038/nnano.2008.215 ↗
42. Nicolosi · Science · 2013 · 340 · 34010.1126/science.341.6144.340 ↗
43. Zhu · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 8410.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402 ↗
44. Kuc · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 260310.1039/C4CS00276H ↗
45. Debbichi · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 8910.1103/PhysRevB.89.205311 ↗
46. Terrones · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 154910.1038/srep01549 ↗
47. Komsa · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8810.1103/PhysRevB.88.085318 ↗
48. Dataset for “Precise structure and energy of group 6 transition metal dichalcogenide homo- and heterobilayers in high-symmetry configurations” Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.10688692 ↗