journal article·2023-10-19Open access

Optimization of Additively Manufactured and Lattice-Structured Hip Implants Using the Linear Regression Algorithm from the Scikit-Learn Library

Rashwan Alkentar, Tamás Mankovits

Crystals· Volume 13· Issue 10

Abstract

As the name implies, patient-specific latticed hip implants vary in design depending on the properties required by the patient to serve as a valid suitable organ. Unit cells are typically built based on a 3D design of beams, and the properties of unit cells change depending on their geometries, which, in turn, are defined by two main parameters: beam length and beam thickness. Due to the continuous increase in the complexity of the unit cells’ designs and their reactions against different loads, the call for machine learning techniques is inevitable to help explore the parameters of the unit cells that can build lattice structures with specific desirable properties. In this study, a machine learning technique is used to predict the best defining parameters (length and thickness) to create a latticed design with a set of required properties (mainly porosity). The data (porosity, mass, and latticed area) from the properties of three unit-cell types, applied to the latticed part of a hip implant design, were collected based on the random length and thickness for three unit-cell types. Using the linear regression algorithm (a supervised machine learning method) from the scikit-learn library, a machine learning model was developed to predict the value of the porosity for the lattice structures based on the length and thickness as input data. The number of samples needed to generate an accurate result for each type of unit cell is also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető u. 2-4., H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary

Doctoral School of Informatics, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, Kassai u. 26., H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Generative machine learning algorithm for lattice structures with superior mechanical properties10.1039/D1MH01792F ↗
2. Tao, W., and Leu, M.C. (2016, January 1–3). Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Cleveland, OH, USA.10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182 ↗
3. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
4. Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
5. Effect of strut length and orientation on elastic mechanical response of modified body-centered cubic lattice structures
6. Lancea, C., Campbell, I., Chicos, L.-A., and Zaharia, S.-M. (2020). Compressive Behaviour of Lattice Structures Manufactured by Polyjet Technologies. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12122767 ↗
7. High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
8. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828 ↗
9. A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 ↗
10. Brackett, D., Ashcroft, I., and Hague, R. (2023, September 01). Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing. Available online: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/88361/2011-27-Brackett.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
11. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: Towards next-generation lightweight structures10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108164 ↗
12. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering
13. E Murr, L., M Gaytan, S., and Martinez, E. (2012). Fabricating Functional Ti-Alloy Biomedical Implants by Additive Manufacturing Using Electron Beam Melting. J. Biotechnol. Biomater., 2.10.4172/2155-952X.1000131 ↗
14. Kolan, K., Leu, M., Hilmas, G., and Comte, T. (2023, September 17). Effect of Architecture and Porosity on Mechanical Properties of Borate Glass Scaffolds Made by Selective Laser Sintering. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-of-Architecture-and-Porosity-on-Mechanical-Kolan-Leu/c115808cc26351f8f3f51f8cc5d4deca007b1ec4.
15. Thomas, A., Kolan, K.C.R., Leu, M.C., and Hilmas, G.E. (2023, September 17). Freeform Extrusion Fabrication of Titanium Fiber Reinforced Bioactive Glass Scaffolds. Available online: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/89448/2015-134-Thomas.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
16. Manufacture of electrical and magnetic graded and anisotropic materials for novel manipulations of microwaves10.1098/rsta.2014.0353 ↗
17. Additive manufacturing structural redesign of hip prostheses for stress-shielding reduction and improved functionality and safety10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104173 ↗
18. Design of metallic bone by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.022 ↗
19. Bone tissue regeneration: The role of scaffold geometry10.1039/C4BM00291A ↗
20. Microstructure design and mechanical properties of 3D printed graded lattice sandwich structures with tailored porosity10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117323 ↗
21. Machine learning assisted design of new lattice core for sandwich structures with superior load carrying capacity10.1038/s41598-021-98015-7 ↗
22. Gasparri, E., Brambilla, A., Lobaccaro, G., Goia, F., Andaloro, A., and Sangiorgio, A. (2022). Rethinking Building Skins, Woodhead Publishing. Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering.
23. Deep learning-based heterogeneous strategy for customizing responses of lattice structures10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107531 ↗
24. Machine learning based lattice generation method derived from topology optimisation
25. Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Lattice Structures through Machine Learning10.1115/1.4053077 ↗
26. Inverse machine learning framework for optimizing lightweight metamaterials10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109937 ↗
27. Ghatak, R., and Gorai, A. (2021). Metamaterials: Engineered Materials and Its Applications in High Frequency Electronics, Elsevier.
28. A mathematically defined 3D auxetic metamaterial with tunable mechanical and conduction properties10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109313 ↗
29. Controllable inverse design of auxetic metamaterials using deep learning10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110178 ↗
30. A deep learning approach for inverse design of gradient mechanical metamaterials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107920 ↗
31. A hybrid deep learning approach for the design of 2D low porosity auxetic metamaterials10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106413 ↗
32. Deep-learning-based isogeometric inverse design for tetra-chiral auxetics10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114808 ↗
33. Controlling the Properties of Additively Manufactured Cellular Structures Using Machine Learning Approaches10.1002/adem.201901338 ↗
34. 3D printable biomimetic rod with superior buckling resistance designed by machine learning10.1038/s41598-020-77935-w ↗
35. Cilla, M., Borgiani, E., Martínez, J., Duda, G.N., and Checa, S. (2017). Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: Application to a short-stem hip implant. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0183755 ↗
36. Inverting the structure–property map of truss metamaterials by deep learning10.1073/pnas.2111505119 ↗
37. Prediction of mechanical properties of carbon fiber based on cross-scale FEM and machine learning10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.042 ↗
38. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
39. Alkentar, R., File, M., and Mankovits, T. (2022). Investigation of the Performance of Ti6Al4V Lattice Structures Designed for Biomedical Implants Using the Finite Element Method. Materials, 5.10.3390/ma15186335 ↗
40. Pal, A., Bhaskar, J., and Kumar, A. (2023). Design and analysis of hip implant. Mater. Today Proc.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.701 ↗
41. Alkentar, R., Kladovasilakis, N., Tzetzis, D., and Mankovits, T. (2023). Effects of Pore Size Parameters of Titanium Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures on the Osseointegration Process in Orthopedic Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Crystals, 13.10.3390/cryst13010113 ↗
42. Methodologies for predicting natural frequency variation of a suspension bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.001 ↗
43. Mali, K. (2023, September 27). Everything you need to Know about Linear Regression! 2023. Available online: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2021/10/everything-you-need-to-know-about-linear-regression/#h-simple-linear-regression.
44. Biswal, A. (2023, September 20). Sklearn Linear Regression. Available online: https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/scikit-learn-tutorial/sklearn-linear-regression-with-examples.
45. Mechanical performance of topology-optimized 3D lattice materials manufactured via selective laser sintering10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111985 ↗
46. Allan, C. (2023, September 29). Improving the Biomechanical Profile of Additive Hip Implants with Field Optimization. Available online: https://www.ntop.com/resources/blog/improving-the-biomechanical-profile-of-additive-hip-implants-with-field-optimization/.
47. An inverse method for characterisation of the static elastic Hooke’s tensors of solid frame of anisotropic open-cell materials10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.103198 ↗
48. Design and mechanical testing of porous lattice structure with independent adjustment of pore size and porosity for bone implant10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.002 ↗