Polarity and Its Influence on Growth Mechanism during MOVPE Growth of GaN Sub-micrometer Rods
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of polarity during the MOVPE growth of GaN based sub-micrometer (sub-μm) rods has mostly been neglected up to now. In this paper we demonstrate that the surface polarity plays a crucial role for the morphology of the GaN sub-μm rods. Based on the differences between N-polar and Ga-polar surfaces, a model is suggested to explain the influence of various parameters on the morphology of GaN sub-μm rods for the first time. For Ga-polar GaN, the {10−11} r-planes, similar to N-polar (000−1) c-planes, are terminated by nitrogen atoms. These N-terminated surfaces can be passivated by hydrogen, which leads to a stable surface with low growth rates and therefore tends to keep a pyramidal shape with stable r-planes. For N-polar GaN, {10−1−1} r-planes can be modified by H 2 etching, leading to the formation of more stable {1−100} m-planes, hence supporting the formation of sub-μm rods with vertical sidewalls.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Halbleitertechnik, TU Braunschweig, Hans-Sommer-Strasse 66, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Osram Opto Semiconductors GmbH, Leibnizstrasse 4, 93055 Regensburg, Germany
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Hersee S. D. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 180810.1021/nl060553t ↗
2. Kishino K. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 206310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.11.056 ↗
3. Ristic J. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 403510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.05.057 ↗
4. Li S. F. · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2010 · 7 · 8410.1002/pssc.200982608 ↗
5. Qian F. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 228710.1021/nl051689e ↗
6. Kim H.-M. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 105910.1021/nl049615a ↗
7. Sekiguchi H. · Electron. Lett. · 2008 · 44 · 15110.1049/el:20082930 ↗
8. Calarco R. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 224810.1021/nl0707398 ↗
9. Wang Y.-L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 21210810.1063/1.3148369 ↗
10. Mastro M. A. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2005 · 274 · 3810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.09.091 ↗
11. Bergbauer W. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 30520110.1088/0957-4484/21/30/305201 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.07.06710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.07.067 ↗
13. Wei J. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 17211110.1063/1.3511541 ↗
14. Fündling S. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 40530110.1088/0957-4484/19/40/405301 ↗
15. Hiramatsu K. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 1999 · 176 · 53510.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199911)176:1<535::AID-PSSA535>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
16. Sumiya M. · MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. · 2004 · 9 · 110.1557/S1092578300000363 ↗
17. For example:Ng, H. M.; Weimann, N. G.; Chowdhury, A.J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 650.Feng, Z. C., Ed.III-nitride semiconductor materials;Imperial College Press:London, 2006; p377.
18. Wei, J. D.; Wang, X.; Neumann, R.; Li, S. F.; Fündling, S.; Merzsch, S.; Suleiman, M.A. M.; Sökmen, Ü.; Wehmann, H.H.; Waag, A.Accepted byPhys. Status Solidi C.
19. Han J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 71 · 311410.1063/1.120263 ↗
20. Jain A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 05311210.1063/1.2973681 ↗
21. VanMil B. L. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2004 · 22 · 214910.1116/1.1768531 ↗
22. Northrup J. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 342910.1063/1.1808227 ↗
23. Feenstra R. M. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2005 · 23 · 117410.1116/1.1881612 ↗
24. Kelly, A.; Groves, G. W.; Kidd, P.InCrystallography and crystal defects;Wiley & Sons Ltd:West Sussex, England, 2000; p391.
25. Yakovlev E. V. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 486210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.07.099 ↗
26. Koukitu A. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2002 · 246 · 23010.1016/S0022-0248(02)01746-3 ↗
27. Imer B. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 06190810.1063/1.2172159 ↗