π–π Stacking Contributing to the Low or Reduced Impact Sensitivity of Energetic Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
π–π stacking, usually together with the aid of hydrogen bonding (HB), serves as a main characteristic of low impact, sensitive, highly energetic materials (LSHEMs), which are highly desired for application, and attracts considerable attention in designing and synthesizing new EMs. This Perspective highlights the progress of the insights into the π–π stacking of EMs, covering traditional energetic crystals with homogeneous neutral molecules, energetic cocrystals (ECCs), and energetic ionic salts (EISs). A rather large π-bond is a requisite for the π–π stacking, and the π–π stacking can be classified into four patterns, including face-to-face stacking, wavelike stacking, crossing stacking, and mixing stacking, with an increasing difficulty in shear sliding, and HB plays an important role in supporting sliding layers. Straightforwardly, the stacking pattern–impact sensitivity relationship is rooted in the steric hindrance when sliding, and the face-to-face π–π stacking is preferred to design LSHEMs at the crystal level, due to the least steric hindrance or the lowest sliding barrier among the four patterns. This stacking has been extensively observed in traditional EMs, ECCs, and EISs, enlightening us to make a rule for designing new EMs with such stacking. However, it is still difficult to make the rule, attributed to the unclear relationship between molecular and stacking structures. Maybe, it will become increasingly feasible to achieve the rule by establishing a database with detailed information on molecules and related stacking patterns, increasing the amount of data by collecting experimental and predicted results, and combining with advanced machine learning technologies. Combining this article with a recent review of HB in EMs (Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19 (10), 5981–5997), an overall perspective of intermolecular interactions in energetic crystals with C, H, O, and N atoms could have been presented.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Crystallography and molecular interactions · High-pressure geophysics and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Chemical Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP), P.O. Box 919-311, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, China
Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100048, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science Challenge Project
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Dong H. · 1994
2. United Nations · 2009 · 69
3. North Atlantic Treaty Organization · 1999
4. Doherty R. M. · 2018 · 6
5. 10.1007/s00894-012-1473-510.1007/s00894-012-1473-5 ↗
6. 10.1002/prep.1979004020410.1002/prep.19790040204 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp051230910.1021/jp0512309 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp052065010.1021/jp0520650 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.00110.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/0009-2614(85)80199-810.1016/0009-2614(85)80199-8 ↗
11. 10.1080/0026897950010089110.1080/00268979500100891 ↗
12. Murray J. S. · Mol. Phys. · 2010 · 93 · 18710.1080/00268979809482203 ↗
13. 10.1080/0026897090274437510.1080/00268970902744375 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp204562d10.1021/jp204562d ↗
15. 10.1021/jp012602q10.1021/jp012602q ↗
16. 10.1021/jp909404f10.1021/jp909404f ↗
17. Xiao H. · Acta Chim. Sinica · 1985 · 43 · 14
18. Xiao H. · Science in China (Series B) · 1995 · 38 · 538
19. Politzer P. · J. Mol. Model. · 2015 · 21 · 26210.1007/s00894-015-2793-z ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(200004)25:2<66::AID-PREP66>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(200004)25:2<66::AID-PREP66>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
21. 10.1039/C7CE01993A10.1039/C7CE01993A ↗
22. Zhang C. · Chin. J. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 26 · 2
23. 10.1002/prep.20188093110.1002/prep.201880931 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja800712e10.1021/ja800712e ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0092910.1021/acs.cgd.8b00929 ↗
26. Ma Y. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2014 · 14 · 470310.1021/cg501048v ↗
27. 10.1007/s00894-009-0587-x10.1007/s00894-009-0587-x ↗
28. 10.1007/s00894-010-0953-810.1007/s00894-010-0953-8 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8CP06350H10.1039/C8CP06350H ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1113610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11136 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0766310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07663 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1139310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11393 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0369110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03691 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja304469510.1021/ja3044695 ↗
35. 10.1021/jz302166p10.1021/jz302166p ↗
36. 10.1063/1.501298910.1063/1.5012989 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9TA06209B10.1039/C9TA06209B ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0174310.1021/acs.jpca.8b01743 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.9495110.1063/1.94951 ↗
40. Teipel U. · 2005
41. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.29110.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.291 ↗
42. Politzer, P.; Alper, H. E. In Computational Chemistry: Reviews of Current Trends; Leszczynski, J., Ed. World Scientific: River Edge, NJ, 1999; pp 271–286.10.1142/9789812815156_0006 ↗
43. Zeman, S. In Energetic Materials, Part 2. Detonation, Combusion, Politzer, P.; Murray, J. S., Eds. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; pp 25–52.
44. Aakeröy C. B. · 2018
45. 10.1039/c2jm33646d10.1039/c2jm33646d ↗
46. 10.1107/S010827019100376110.1107/S0108270191003761 ↗
47. 10.1039/C6RA14510H10.1039/C6RA14510H ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0140910.1021/acs.cgd.6b01409 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0085310.1021/acs.cgd.9b00853 ↗
50. 10.1021/cg501267f10.1021/cg501267f ↗
51. 10.1107/S0365110X6500107X10.1107/S0365110X6500107X ↗
52. 10.1107/S0365110X6700110010.1107/S0365110X67001100 ↗
53. 10.1107/S056774088100773510.1107/S0567740881007735 ↗
54. 10.1002/1521-4087(200012)25:6<277::AID-PREP277>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/1521-4087(200012)25:6<277::AID-PREP277>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
55. Gilardi, R. Private Communication, 1999.
56. Kolev T. · New Cryst. Struct. · 2000 · 215 · 483
57. 10.1107/S010876810502279210.1107/S0108768105022792 ↗
58. 10.1021/j100668a01710.1021/j100668a017 ↗
59. 10.1021/ic052150m10.1021/ic052150m ↗
60. Gilardi R. D. · Acta Crystallogr. · 2001 · 57 · o657-o658
61. 10.1107/S056774087200206710.1107/S0567740872002067 ↗
62. 10.1021/j100268a03310.1021/j100268a033 ↗
63. 10.1107/S0365110X6300178X10.1107/S0365110X6300178X ↗
64. 10.1021/jo00296a06610.1021/jo00296a066 ↗
65. 10.1107/S056774087200704610.1107/S0567740872007046 ↗
66. 10.1107/S056774087000394110.1107/S0567740870003941 ↗
67. Gilardi R. · Acta Crystallogr. · 2002 · 58 · o972-o97410.1107/S0108767302094308 ↗
68. Akopyan Z. A. · J. Struct. Chem. · 1966 · 7 · 408
69. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000117)39:2<401::AID-ANIE401>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000117)39:2<401::AID-ANIE401>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
70. Nielsen A. T. · Tetrahedron · 1998 · 54 · 1179310.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-8 ↗
71. 10.1107/S0365110X6600080X10.1107/S0365110X6600080X ↗
72. Miller D. R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 537210.1021/ja048939y ↗
73. 10.1007/s10853-018-2768-410.1007/s10853-018-2768-4 ↗
74. 10.1021/ja106892a10.1021/ja106892a ↗
75. 10.1021/ja105503310.1021/ja1055033 ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0153710.1021/acs.cgd.8b01537 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.poly.2012.12.01510.1016/j.poly.2012.12.015 ↗
78. Nikitina E. V. · Kristallografiya · 1982 · 27 · 485
79. Fischer N. · Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. · 2013 · 2013 · 216710.1002/ejic.201201192 ↗
80. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0392110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03921 ↗
81. 10.1002/prep.20070024010.1002/prep.200700240 ↗
82. 10.1021/ic052150m10.1021/ic052150m ↗
83. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0070410.1021/acs.cgd.8b00704 ↗
84. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1064410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10644 ↗
85. 10.1063/1.9495110.1063/1.94951 ↗
86. 10.1063/1.34925310.1063/1.349253 ↗
87. 10.1063/1.35757610.1063/1.357576 ↗
88. 10.1063/1.233568010.1063/1.2335680 ↗
89. 10.1063/1.271903110.1063/1.2719031 ↗
90. 10.1021/jp808367r10.1021/jp808367r ↗
91. 10.1039/C7CE01914A10.1039/C7CE01914A ↗
92. 10.1039/c3ce40817e10.1039/c3ce40817e ↗
93. Storm C. B. · 1990
94. 10.1021/jp910883x10.1021/jp910883x ↗
95. 10.1021/jp110450510.1021/jp1104505 ↗
96. 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00100-010.1016/S0009-2614(97)00100-0 ↗
97. 10.1039/B203191B10.1039/B203191B ↗
98. 10.1039/b008495f10.1039/b008495f ↗
99. Wang Y. · Chinese J. Org Chem · 2018 · 28 · 997
100. 10.1021/jo061235h10.1021/jo061235h ↗