Role of oxygen bubble generation in anodic film growth on InP
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The morphologies of barrier-type anodic films grown on InP have been investigated using atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy in order to gain further understanding of the non-linear voltage–time behaviour and the development of blisters in the films. The films, which are two layered, with an outer layer of In2O3 and an inner phosphorus-rich layer, containing also indium species, were formed at 50 A m−2 in aqueous 0.1 M sodium tungstate electrolyte at 298 K. During the early stages of anodizing, i.e. within the initial region of linear voltage–time response, a relatively compact and uniform film forms, with a comparatively featureless surface. However, as the voltage increases, cavities develop within the film, and in places the anodic film material detaches partially from the substrate. The film surface then discloses fine-textured roughness and coarse protuberances associated with cavity formation and detachment respectively. Such transformation of the film morphology correlates with a decrease in slope of the voltage–time response, which commences at a formation voltage of approximately 17 V, with a film thickness of about 25 nm. The behaviour is explained by generation of oxygen within the anodic film material, which forms high pressure bubbles of gas. Such gas formation is related to the presence of an In2O3 outer layer of the film and the presence of units of In2O3 in the inner layer of the film, which facilitate oxidation of O2− ions of the film material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Wilmsen · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1978 · 15 · 151310.1116/1.569776 ↗
2. Geib · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1980 · 17 · 95210.1116/1.570645 ↗
3. Hollinger · J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A · 1985 · 3 · 208210.1116/1.572928 ↗
4. Robach · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 48 · 128110.1063/1.97386 ↗
5. Hollinger · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1987 · 5 · 110810.1116/1.583737 ↗
6. Franz · J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 63 · 50010.1063/1.340270 ↗
7. van den Ven · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 756810.1063/1.345821 ↗
8. Robach · J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 71 · 298110.1063/1.351002 ↗
9. Besland · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1993 · 140 · 10410.1149/1.2056067 ↗
10. Fathipour · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 1983 · 1 · 66210.1116/1.572204 ↗
11. McCaffrey · Microsc. Res. Tech. · 1993 · 24 · 18010.1002/jemt.1070240210 ↗
12. Furneaux · Corros. Sci. · 1978 · 18 · 85310.1016/0010-938X(78)90009-4 ↗
13. Habazaki · Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. · 1997 · 75 · 1810.1080/00202967.1997.11871137 ↗
14. Skeldon · Phil. Mag. A · 1997 · 76 · 72910.1080/01418619708214206 ↗
15. Metikos-Hukovic · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1998 · 455 · 18110.1016/S0022-0728(98)00274-5 ↗
16. Echeverria · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 301110.1149/1.1838756 ↗
17. F. Echeverria, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, H. Habazaki, K. Shimizu, Thin Solid Films 37 (2000) 30310.1016/S0040-6090(00)00968-8 ↗
18. Habazaki · J. Phys. D · 1996 · 29 · 254510.1088/0022-3727/29/10/004 ↗
19. Echeverria · J. Corros. Sci. · 2000 · 42 · 183910.1016/S0010-938X(00)00030-5 ↗