journal article·2000-06

The influence of sulphur segregation on the oxidation of industrial FeCrMo steel

A.P. Greeff, C.W. Louw, J.J. Terblans, H.C. Swart

Corrosion Science· Volume 42· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fe–9Cr–1Mo steel is used as a corrosion resistant alloy in pressurised water reactors. The high steam temperature and pressure inside the reactors result in erosion corrosion. The steel’s hardness and resistance to various forms of corrosion are determined by the composition of the oxide layer formed on the alloy at elevated temperatures. Samples were taken from pieces of pipe removed after failure and that have an operation history in excess of 20 years in a power generation facility. Auger electron spectroscopy was used to monitor the changes on the sample surface during annealing between 200°C and 809°C in UHV. Cr, P and N first segregate to the surface, followed by S and Sn. Mo and Sn as well as Cr, P and N display co-segregation kinetics. No C segregation was measured. At 809°C the segregation of S dominates. The same sample was oxidised at oxygen partial pressures of 1×10 −7 and 5×10 −8 Torr. The amount of O on the surface decreased with an increase in temperature and the O Auger peak-to-peak height changed from a linear-parabolic curve to a more S-like curve at higher temperatures for both pressures. Auger spectra confirmed that this is due to the segregation of S to the surface. The segregation of S at high temperatures not only leads to site competition with O-atoms during chemisorption, but also forms a diffusion barrier restricting the movement of ions between the oxide and the metal. This restricts the growth in thickness of the oxide layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Birks · 1983 · 110
2. Scully · 1975 · 32
3. Trethewey · 1988 · 337
4. Gemmill · 1992 · 489
5. S.J. Mallinger, Hazard Information Bulletin, Technical Report, 1996, http://www.saftek.com/boiler/HIB_19961031.html
6. Todd · 1983 · 207
7. Cabibil · Surf. Sci · 1995 · 329 · 10110.1016/0039-6028(95)00116-6 ↗
8. Holtzhausen · Corr. Sci · 1990 · 30 · 6710.1016/0010-938X(90)90236-X ↗
9. Tjong · Appl. Surf. Sci · 1991 · 47 · 31110.1016/0169-4332(91)90084-W ↗
10. Van Staden · Appl. Surf. Sci · 1990 · 44 · 26310.1016/0169-4332(90)90083-C ↗
11. Lui · J. Vac. Sci. Technol · 1992 · A 10 · 2355
12. Siconolfi · Corr. Sci · 1984 · 24 · 13710.1016/0010-938X(84)90042-8 ↗
13. Roos · Surf. Interface Anal · 1994 · 22 · 6510.1002/sia.740220117 ↗
14. Ichimura · Surf. Interface Anal · 1979 · 1 · 210.1002/sia.740010103 ↗
15. du Plessis · 1990 · 25
16. Greyling · Corr. Sci · 1984 · 24 · 67510.1016/0010-938X(84)90058-1 ↗
17. Stulen · J. Vac. Sci. Technol · 1974 · 16 · 94010.1116/1.570117 ↗
18. Lin · Surf. Sci · 1997 · 371 · 33710.1016/S0039-6028(96)01004-7 ↗
19. Thomas · J. Vac. Sci. Technol · 1980 · 17 · 2510.1116/1.570406 ↗
20. Delport · Corr. Sci · 1974 · 26 · 40710.1016/0010-938X(86)90136-8 ↗
21. Hofmann · Thin Solid Films · 1990 · 193 · 64810.1016/0040-6090(90)90216-Z ↗
22. Hudson · 1992 · 175