Roles of aluminium and chromium in sulfidation and oxidation of sputter-deposited Al- and Cr-refractory metal alloys

Abstract Our recent results of the sulfidation and oxidation behavior of sputter-deposited Al- and Cr-refractory metal alloys at high temperatures are reviewed, and the roles of the aluminum and chromium in sulfidation and oxidation of these alloys are discussed in this paper. Niobium, molybdenum and tantalum are highly resistant to sulfide corrosion. Their sulfidation resistance is further enhanced by alloying with aluminum. Although Cr-refractory metal alloys also reveal high sulfidation resistance, their sulfidation rates do not become lower than those of the corresponding refractory metals. The sulfide scales formed on the Al-refractory metal and Cr-refractory metal alloys consist of two layers, comprising an outer Al 2 S 3 or Cr 2 S 3 layer and an inner refractory metal disulfide layer. The inner layer has a columnar structure, and the growth direction of the refractory metal disulfides is perpendicular to 0 0 1 direction. Intercalation of Al 3+ ions into NbS 2 and a decrease in the sulfur activity at the outer layer/inner layer interface by the presence of the Al 2 S 3 layer are probably responsible for the improvement of the sulfidation resistance by the addition of aluminum. The oxidation resistance of niobium and tantalum is improved more effectively by the addition of chromium rather than aluminum. Although preferential oxidation of chromium does not occur, an outer protective Cr 2 O 3 layer in the oxide scales is formed on Cr-rich Cr–Nb and Cr–Ta alloys due to outward diffusion of Cr 3+ ions. In contrast, continuous alumina layer cannot be formed on the Al–Nb and Al–Ta alloys, and the alloys reveal a pest phenomenon at 1073 K, and at higher temperatures rapid oxidation occurs. Concerning the oxidation of molybdenum, the addition of aluminum, which has higher activity for oxidation than chromium, is more effective in improving the oxidation resistance of molybdenum than chromium addition, since preferential oxidation of aluminum suppresses the formation of volatile molybdenum oxide.