Interpretation of the anodic and cathodic potential variations during the AC-graining of aluminium in hydrochloric acid
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The variations of the anodic and cathodic amplitudes during the AC-graining of aluminium in hydrochloric acid electrolyte were investigated in this work in order to combine the amplitude variations with the electrochemical reactions that take place in the electrograining process. Aluminium samples were galvanostatically grained in 0.34 M hydrochloric acid and the signal of the applied potential versus a reference electrode was recorded by a high frequency acquisition system. The potential variation during the AC-graining of the aluminium alloy AA1050 and of pure aluminium (99.99%) was examined as well as the influence on the potential variation of the applied pre-treatments. In addition, scanning electron microscopy and backscattering electron micrographs were also used to examine the aluminium samples. The smut layer formation at the initial stages of graining was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It was concluded that the variations of the anodic and cathodic amplitudes were divided into three different regions. An interpretation of these regions was achieved by the combination of the potential measurements of the different example substrates with the subsequent observations of the grained surfaces. By using this interpretation of the potential variations, interesting information can be obtained about the influence on the electrograining process of the aluminium substrate, the applied pre-treatments and the electrograining conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Dowell · Trans. IMF · 1979 · 57 · 13810.1080/00202967.1979.11870504 ↗
2. Koroleva · Corros. Sci. · 2005 · 47 · 222510.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.013 ↗
3. Terryn · Corros. Sci. · 1991 · 32 · 115910.1016/0010-938X(91)90129-D ↗
4. Hutchinson · Tranf. IMF · 2001 · 79 · B57
5. Vermeersch · ATB Met. · 2003 · 43 · 130
6. Dowell · Tranf. IMF · 1987 · 65 · 14710.1080/00202967.1987.11870791 ↗
7. Marshall · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 1995 · 11 · 101510.1179/mst.1995.11.10.1015 ↗
8. Koroleva · Tranf. IMF · 2002 · 80 · 15710.1080/00202967.2002.11871458 ↗
9. Laevers · Corros. Sci. · 1993 · 35 · 23110.1016/0010-938X(93)90153-8 ↗
10. Laevers · Tranf. IMF · 1996 · 74 · 16110.1080/00202967.1996.11871118 ↗
11. Th. Dimogerontakis, P. Campestrini, H. Terryn, 2006 Proceedings-Electrochemical Society PV 2004 – 19, pp. 402–411.
12. Amor · Corros. Sci. · 1998 · 40 · 215510.1016/S0010-938X(98)00101-2 ↗
13. Koroleva · Electrochim. Acta · 2005 · 50 · 209110.1016/j.electacta.2004.09.017 ↗
14. ASTM G1-90, e1 Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens, 1999.
15. Dimogerontakis · Appl. Phys. A · 2005 · 81 · 117310.1007/s00339-004-3143-7 ↗
16. Terryn · Trans. IMF · 1998 · 66 · 166
17. Th. Dimogerontakis, H. Terryn, C. Campestrini, in: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on the Passivation of Metals, Paris, France, 27 June–1 July 2005, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, p. 173–178.10.1016/B978-044452224-5/50029-9 ↗
18. O’Sullivan · Proc. Roy. Soc. London · 1970 · A317 · 51110.1098/rspa.1970.0129 ↗
19. Laevers · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1998 · 28 · 38710.1023/A:1003288305367 ↗
20. Terryn · Corros. Sci. · 1991 · 32 · 117310.1016/0010-938X(91)90130-H ↗
21. Ambat · Corros. Sci. · 2006 · 48 · 345510.1016/j.corsci.2006.01.005 ↗
22. Dimogerontakis · Corros. Sci. · 1998 · 40 · 193910.1016/S0010-938X(98)00114-0 ↗