journal article·2007-12

Role of imposed potentials in threshold for caustic cracking susceptibility (KISCC): Investigations using circumferential notch tensile (CNT) testing

R.K. Singh Raman, R. Rihan, R.N. Ibrahim

Corrosion Science· Volume 49· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A fracture mechanics-based novel approach, i.e. circumferential notch tensile (CNT) testing has been employed for determination of threshold stress intensity factor for susceptibility of engineering materials to stress corrosion cracking ( K ISCC ) using small specimens. Using CNT technique, K ISCC of a carbon steel at an open circuit potential ( E corr ) in 500 g L −1 NaOH at 100 °C was determined to be 42.9 MPa m 1/2 . In order to establish the application of the CNT technique in understanding the mechanistic aspects of caustic cracking as well as for developing guidelines for mitigation, tests have also been performed under the imposed electrochemical potentials. An imposed potential in the active–passive potential regime ( E a–p ) caused an extremely rapid failure (than observed at E corr ) whereas, at an imposed potential in the passive region ( E p ), the specimen did not fail even after relatively very long exposure time. The fractography of the CNT specimens tested at E corr and E a–p presented evidence of SCC. The study has established the use of experimental CNT testing as a simple, relatively fast and cost-advantageous approach for generating the K ISCC data, which are also consistent with the electrochemical mechanism for caustic cracking.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Sedriks, Publications of National Association of Corrosion Engineers, US, 1990.
2. 1982
3. Turnbull · Brit. Corros. J. · 1992 · 27 · 27110.1179/bcj.1992.27.4.271 ↗
4. Rihan · Mat. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 407 · 20710.1016/j.msea.2005.06.055 ↗
5. L. Dahl, T. Dahlgren, N. Lagmyr, in: D.de G Jones, R.W. Stahle (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature–High Pressure Electrochemistry in Aqueous Solutions (NACE), 1976, Houston, p. 533.
6. Yasuda · Corrosion · 1987 · 43 · 49210.5006/1.3583892 ↗
7. Rondelli · Corros. Sci. · 1997 · 39 · 103710.1016/S0010-938X(97)88507-1 ↗
8. Singbeil · J. Electrochem. Soc.: Electrochem. Sci. Technol., Corrosion · 1981 · 206510.1149/1.2127190 ↗
9. Singbeil · Metall. Trans. A · 1982 · 13A · 109110.1007/BF02643407 ↗
10. Brown · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1969 · 116 · 21810.1149/1.2411799 ↗
11. Sriram · Corrosion · 1985 · 41 · 38110.5006/1.3583012 ↗
12. Sriram · Metall. Trans. A · 1985 · 16A · 97910.1007/BF02814850 ↗
13. Le · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1992 · 22 · 39610.1007/BF01092695 ↗
14. Le · Corros. Sci. · 1990 · 30 · 11710.1016/0010-938X(90)90067-F ↗
15. Arsenault · Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip. · 1991 · 45 · 2310.1016/0308-0161(91)90042-Z ↗
16. Raman · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2005 · 36A · 181710.1007/s11661-005-0045-z ↗
17. S. Giddy, B.W. Cherry, F. Lawson, M. Forsyth, D.F.A. Koch, in: Proceedings on Corrosion & Prevention, 1997, Brisbane, Paper # 049, pp. 1–8.
18. B. Case, G.J. Bignold, in: International Conference on High Temperature–High Pressure Electrochemistry in Aqueous Solutions, NACE, 1973, University of Surrey, UK, pp. 334–340.
19. Ibrahim · Int. J. Fracture · 1990 · 44 · 17910.1007/BF00035515 ↗
20. Ibrahim · ASME PVP · 1999 · 388 · 155
21. Ibrahim · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1986 · 25 · 39510.1016/0013-7944(86)90253-5 ↗
22. Raman · Mat. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 441 · 34210.1016/j.msea.2006.08.041 ↗