journal article·2011-05

Using the right side of Poisson’s equation to save on numerical calculations in FEM simulation of electrochemical systems

R. Montoya, J.C. Galván, J. Genesca

Corrosion Science· Volume 53· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

This work justifies using the right side of Poisson’s equation (RSPE)1 to simulate constant potential electrodes (CPEl) in electrochemical processes. These have traditionally been considered in the boundary conditions of the corresponding boundary value problem (BVP), but in some cases working with the RSPE is much more versatile, efficient and suitable. If constant potential regions are considered as boundaries, then the domain constantly changes as the number, size and position of the regions change; but if they are considered as the source term, the domain remains the same, no matter how many electrodes there are or how or where they are located. Some examples will be solved in order to clearly show that the complicated process of redefining a domain mesh and numbering its corresponding nodes in the finite element method (FEM) is sometimes unnecessary when the electrodes are represented with a suitable function on the RSPE. These practical examples are simulated using a finite element program developed by the authors
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Computer modeling of offshore cathodic protection systems: method and experience
2. Numerical simulation of a cathodically protected semisubmersible platform using the PROCAT system10.5006/1.3585141 ↗
3. A boundary element study of cathodic protection systems in high resistivity electrolytes
4. Numerical modeling and solution of galvanic corrosion systems. Part 2 – Governing differential-equation and electronic boundary-conditions10.5006/1.3585300 ↗
5. A mathematical-model for a galvanic anode cathodic protection system
6. Analysis of potential and current-density distributions using a boundary element method10.5006/1.3584967 ↗
7. Optimization of cathodic protection systems, using boundary elements and genetic algorithms10.5006/1.3280781 ↗
8. Cathodic protection of multiple pipelines with coating holidays
9. Study of sacrificial anode cathodic protection of buried tanks: numerical modeling10.1023/A:1003408122084 ↗
10. Optimization of cathodic protection system by BEM10.1016/S0955-7997(97)00019-2 ↗
11. A numerical-model for cathodic protection of buried pipes10.5006/1.3293492 ↗
12. Mathematical models for cathodic protection of an underground pipeline with coating holidays. Part 1 –Theoretical development10.5006/1.3280467 ↗
13. Current and potential distribution on a coated pipeline with holidays. Part 1 – Model and experimental-verification10.5006/1.3316041 ↗
14. Current and potential distribution on a coated pipeline with holidays. Part 2 – Comparison of the effects of discrete and distributed holidays10.5006/1.3316042 ↗
15. Mathematical simulation of a cathodic protection system by finite element method10.1002/maco.200403854 ↗
16. Influence of conductivity on cathodic protection of reinforced alkali-activated slag mortar using the finite element method10.1016/j.corsci.2009.08.020 ↗
17. Experimental measurement and computer simulation of galvanic corrosion of magnesium coupled to steel10.1002/adem.200600206 ↗
18. Reddy · 1998 · vol. 27
19. Rektorys · 1980