journal article·2014-03

Characterization of ductile damage for a high carbon steel using 3D X-ray micro-tomography and mechanical tests – Application to the identification of a shear modified GTN model

T.-S. Cao, E. Maire, C. Verdu, C. Bobadilla, P. Lasne, P. Montmitonnet, P.-O. Bouchard

Publisher page

Abstract

The present paper deals with the identification of the parameters of a generalized GTN model and the characterization of ductile damage for a high carbon steel by both X-ray micro-tomography and "macroscopic" mechanical tests. First, in situ X-ray micro-tomography tensile tests are performed and the results are used for the modeling of ductile damage mechanisms (voids nucleation, growth and coalescence) using analytical formulations. Interrupted in situ SEM tensile test is also carried out to examine the microstructure evolution. The damage process during in situ X-ray micro-tomography tensile tests is the result of continuous nucleation of small voids and significant growth of large voids; whereas the coalescence takes place locally. In addition, tomography results combined with the results of macroscopic mechanical tests at different loading configurations are used to identify the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model extended for shear loading by Xue (2008). It proved necessary to propose an improvement to account for the influence of the stress triaxiality level on the nucleation formulation of the GTN model. This new formulation is then identified via experimental tests. The results show that, with the parameters obtained from both microstructure measurements and macroscopic considerations, the modified GTN model can reproduce quite accurately the experimental results for different loading configurations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Abbasi · Proc. Eng. · 2011 · 10 · 41510.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.070 ↗
2. Abramoff · Biophotonics Int. · 2004 · 11 · 36
3. Arnold · Calcolo · 1984 · 21 · 33710.1007/BF02576171 ↗
4. Barsoum · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2007 · 44 · 176810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.031 ↗
5. Barsoum · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2011 · 48 · 92510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.028 ↗
6. Benzerga · Eur. J. Mech. – A/Solids · 2001 · 20 · 39710.1016/S0997-7538(01)01147-0 ↗
7. Benzerga · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 463910.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.019 ↗
8. Besson · Int. J. Damage Mech. · 2010 · 19 · 310.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
9. Bettaieb · Mech. Mater. · 2011 · 43 · 13910.1016/j.mechmat.2011.02.005 ↗
10. Bouaziz · Rev. Métall. · 2008 · 105 · 10210.1051/metal:2008021 ↗
11. T.-S. Cao, Modeling Ductile Damage for Complex Loading Paths, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 10, 2013.
12. Cao · Key Eng. Mater. · 2013 · 21310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.213 ↗
13. Cao · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2013 · 50 · 398410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.011 ↗
14. Cao · Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. · 2013 · 96 · 56110.1002/nme.4571 ↗
15. Chu · J. Eng. Mater. Technol. · 1980 · 102 · 24910.1115/1.3224807 ↗
16. Fabrégue · Mater. Sci. Eng.: A · 2013 · 579 · 9210.1016/j.msea.2013.05.013 ↗
17. Fansi · Mater. Sci. Eng.: A · 2013 · 569 · 110.1016/j.msea.2013.01.019 ↗
18. Gologanu · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1993 · 41 · 172310.1016/0022-5096(93)90029-F ↗
19. Gurson · J. Eng. Mater. Technol. · 1977 · 99 · 210.1115/1.3443401 ↗
20. He · Chinese J. Aeronaut. · 2011 · 24 · 37810.1016/S1000-9361(11)60045-9 ↗
21. Huang · J. Appl. Mech. · 1991 · 58 · 108410.1115/1.2897686 ↗
22. Kao · J. Mater. Res. · 1990 · 5 · 8310.1557/JMR.1990.0089 ↗
23. C. Landron, Ductile Damage Characterization in Dual-Phase Steels Using X-ray Tomography, Ph.D. thesis, L’Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 12, 2011.10.1007/978-1-4614-0228-2_2 ↗
24. Damage characterization in dual-phase steels using X-ray tomography
25. Landron · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms · 2012 · 284 · 1510.1016/j.nimb.2011.08.069 ↗
26. Landron · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 756410.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.046 ↗
27. Leblond · Eur. J. Mech. Solids · 1995 · 14 · 499
28. Madou · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2012 · 60 · 102010.1016/j.jmps.2011.11.008 ↗
29. Maire · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 495410.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.015 ↗
30. Maire · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 680610.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.043 ↗
31. T. Massé, Study and Optimization of High Carbon Steel Flat Wires, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 01, 2010.
32. Muhlich · Comput. Mech. · 2003 · 31 · 47910.1007/s00466-003-0454-z ↗
33. Nahshon · Eur. J. Mech. – A/Solids · 2008 · 27 · 110.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002 ↗
34. Needleman · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1984 · 32 · 46110.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
35. Pardoen · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2000 · 48 · 246710.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
36. Ran · Int. J. Plasticity · 2013 · 41 · 6510.1016/j.ijplas.2012.09.002 ↗
37. Rice · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1969 · 17 · 20110.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
38. Siruguet · Int. J. Plasticity · 2004 · 20 · 22510.1016/S0749-6419(03)00018-4 ↗
39. Suéry · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 101 · 108010.3139/146.110386 ↗
40. Thuillier · Mater. Sci. Eng.: A · 2012 · 558 · 21710.1016/j.msea.2012.07.116 ↗
41. Tvergaard · Int. J. Fract. · 1981 · 17 · 38910.1007/BF00036191 ↗
42. Material failure by void growth to coalescence
43. Tvergaard · Acta Metall. · 1984 · 32 · 15710.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
44. Voce · Metallurgica · 1955 · 51 · 219
45. Weck · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 291910.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.027 ↗
46. Wen · Int. J. Plasticity · 2005 · 21 · 38110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.01.004 ↗
47. Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗