journal article·2012-04

Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core

M. Giglio, A. Gilioli, A. Manes

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An experimental–numerical methodology for the investigation of three point bending test (TPBT) on sandwich panels with Al skins and Nomex™ Honeycomb core is presented. A dedicated focus on numerical models is presented. Using data obtained from flatwise compressive tests, a highly detailed FE model (micromechanical level), has been built. It has, therefore, been possible to reproduce, with an elevated grade of similarity, the real behavior of sandwich panels in TPBT. Particular attention has been paid to verify the accurate modeling of the crushing behavior of the core during the last part of TPBT. Numerical results and experimental data have been compared. This comparison has not only been based on a load–displacement curve, but has been further exemplified by detailed photographical images, throughout the whole loading process, of the local behavior of the cells crushing. The influence of various parameters (friction and relative position of the puncher) has been also evaluated from a numerical point of view.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Elasticity and Material Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. M. Giglio, A. Gilioli, A. Manes, Composites Part B (2011), doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016 ↗
2. Gibson · 1997
3. Triantafillou · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1987 · 95 · 3710.1016/0025-5416(87)90496-4 ↗
4. Petras · Compos. Struct. · 1999 · 44 · 23710.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8 ↗
5. Staal · J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. · 2009 · 11 · 7310.1177/1099636209103557 ↗
6. R.P. Ley, W. Lin, U. Mbanefo, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Facesheet Wrinkling in Sandwich Structures, El Segundo, California, NASA/CR-1999-208994.
7. B.J. Harris, W.C. Crisman, Face wrinkling mode of buckling of sandwich panels, in: Proc ASCE Engineering Mech Div 91, fourth ed. (EM3), 1965, pp. 93–111.10.1061/JMCEA3.0000629 ↗
8. Yussuff · J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. · 1955 · 59 · 3010.1017/S0368393100131761 ↗
9. Zhou · J. Sandwich Struct. Mater · 2005 · 7 · 373
10. Zhou · J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. · 2006 · 8
11. Mamalis · Int. J. Crashworthiness · 2008 · 13 · 34910.1080/13588260801933691 ↗
12. Bezazi · Strength Mater. · 2007 · 3910.1007/s11223-007-0022-4 ↗
13. Bezazi · Strength Mater. · 2009 · 4110.1007/s11223-009-9131-6 ↗
14. Sadighi · World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. · 2007 · 36
15. J. Feldhusen, S. Torsakul, A.N. Brezing, S.K. Krishnamoorthy, in: An Approach to Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Cellular Foam Sandwich Structures in Commercial FE-Softwares, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 8–11 December, Singapore, pp. 836–841.10.1109/IEEM.2008.4737987 ↗
16. Castanie · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2008 · 35 · 62010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.008 ↗
17. Aktay · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 2008 · 75 · 261610.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008 ↗
18. Heimbs · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 45 · 20510.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.017 ↗
19. ASTM C393/C 393M-06, Standard Test Method Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure.
20. Hexcell Corporation, HexWeb® HRH-10, Aramid Fibre/Phenolic Honeycomb, Product Data.
21. Giglio · Key Eng. Mater. · 2012 · 488–489 · 33
22. Matlab R2010a, Product help.
23. Foo · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 68 · 134810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.007 ↗
24. Johnson · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1985 · 21 · 3110.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
25. F. Viganò, A. Manes, M. Giglio, Int. J. Mech. Sci., in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.10.003.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.10.003 ↗
26. HexWeb™ Honeycomb Sandwich Design Technology.