Structural characterisation and failure mechanisms of high-performance marine stringers in out-of-plane bending loads
Source abstract
Abstract
Hat stringers are structural components that stiffen and strengthen composite hull panels of high-performance racing yachts. The failure mechanisms of stringer structures are complex, and the relationships between geometric parameters and failure modes are not well understood. This is due to a lack of experimental validation resulting from the cost and complexity in experimentally testing as-designed and in-service load cases. This leads to the reliance on experiential knowledge and coupon data. Experiments based on a 3-point bend provide an alternate method to the testing of full panels to determine structural behaviour and failure mechanisms This can be used to validate designs and better inform design choices. In this work, the structural performance of shear- and bending-dominated marine omega stringer structures are characterised experimentally and numerically under 3-point bending to understand strain states under load, failure mechanisms, and the validity of coupon data when designing complex composite structures. Strain state predictions from the numerical model are well-validated at proof loads, while comparisons at failure are complicated by stochastic laminate defects, geometric features, and discrepancies in predicting based on coupon data. The results of this study highlight the differences between as-designed and actual strengths in marine stringer structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Wave and Wind Energy Systems · Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. Quantification of hydroelasticity in water impacts of flexible composite hull panels10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.012 ↗
2. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
3. Michelis · 2009
4. Creative design for sandwich structures: A review10.1177/1729881420921327 ↗
5. Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002 ↗
6. Dynamic characterisation of marine sandwich structures
7. Battley M, Allen T, Pehrson P, Stenius I, Rosén A. Effects of Panel Stiffness on Slamming Responses of Composite Hull Panels. In: International conference on composite materials. 2009, p. 1–11.
8. Repeated slamming of sandwich composite panels on water10.1177/1099636209103169 ↗
9. Damage assessment due to single slamming of foam core sandwich composites10.1177/1099636209105402 ↗
10. Damage assessment due to repeated slamming of foam core sandwich composites10.1177/1099636209344131 ↗
11. Hydroelastic interaction in panel-water impacts of high-speed craft10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.010 ↗
12. Servo-hydraulic system for controlled velocity water impact of marine sandwich panels10.1007/s11340-011-9543-7 ↗
13. Allen · 2013
14. Camilleri · 2017
15. Progressive damage modeling in laminate composites under slamming impact water for naval applications10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.004 ↗
16. Numerical evaluation of dynamic response for flexible composite structures under slamming impact for naval applications10.1007/s10443-017-9646-0 ↗
17. Mechanical behavior of composite structures subjected to constant slamming impact velocity: An experimental and numerical investigation10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.035 ↗
18. Mechanical performance evaluation of sandwich panels exposed to slamming impacts: Comparison between experimental and SPH results10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.051 ↗
19. Experiment and optimization of the hat-stringer-stiffened composite panels under axial compression10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.039 ↗
20. Zenkert · 2009
21. Effect of shear stresses on fibre direction tensile failure using a new simple and reliable test method with thin plies10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108155 ↗
22. Chapter 1.1 - the world-wide failure exercise: Its origin, concept and content10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50002-0 ↗
23. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00228-8 ↗
24. Chapter 6.1 - predictive capabilities of nineteen failure theories and design methodologies for polymer composite laminates. Part b: Comparison with experiments10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50038-X ↗
25. A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part i – marine impacts on marine composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.073 ↗
26. How coupon and element tests reduce conservativeness in element failure prediction10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.012 ↗
27. Features and defects characterisation for virtual verification and certification of composites: A review10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110282 ↗
28. ASTM · 2016
29. Failure of quasi-isotropic composite laminates with free edges10.1177/073168448800700602 ↗
30. Size effects in unnotched tensile strength of unidirectional and quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.002 ↗
31. Effect of out-of-plane wrinkles in curved multi-directional carbon/epoxy laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108282 ↗
32. Office of Aviation Research · 2001
33. Department of Defense · 2002
34. Nettles A. Allowables for Structural Composites. In: International conference on composites engineering. United States; 2004.
35. Little · 2023
36. Verdier · 2023
37. Buckling and postbuckling of stringer stiffened fibre composite curved panels - tests and computations10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.050 ↗
38. Failure analysis of composite multi-stringer panels using simplified models10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.030 ↗
39. The application of reliability methods in the design of tophat stiffened composite panels under in-plane loading10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.03.002 ↗
40. Experimental investigation of the postbuckling response and collapse of a single-stringer specimen10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.018 ↗
41. Effect of the stiffener stiffness on the buckling and post-buckling behavior of stiffened composite panels - experimental investigation10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.021 ↗
42. Investigation into skin stiffener debonding of top-hat stiffened composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.061 ↗
43. Experimental and numerical investigation of stiffened composite curved panel under shear and in-plane bending10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.049 ↗
44. Damage and failure analysis of composite stiffened panels under low-velocity impact and compression after impact
45. Local postbuckling of omega-stringer-stiffened composite panels10.1016/j.tws.2022.110027 ↗
46. Experimental and numerical study of bending-induced buckling of stiffened composite plate assemblies10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109642 ↗
47. Post-buckling damage tolerance of welded omega-stiffened thermoplastic panels with initial damage10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118295 ↗
48. Failure analysis of hat-stringer-stiffened aircraft composite panels under four-point bending loading10.3390/ma15072430 ↗
49. International Organisation for Standardisation. Part 5: Design pressures for monohulls, design stresses, scantlings determination. In: ISO 12215-5 small craft - hull construction and scantlings. 2019.
50. An experimental and numerical study on omega stringer debonding10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.013 ↗
51. Postbuckling behaviour of a pressurized stiffened composite panel – part I: Experimental study10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.014 ↗
52. Postbuckling behavior of a pressurized stiffened composite panel – part II: Numerical analysis. Effect of the geometrical imperfections10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.013 ↗
53. Monte Carlo reliability analysis of tophat stiffened composite plate structures under out of plane loading10.1016/j.ress.2012.08.011 ↗
54. Parametric modeling, higher order FEA and experimental investigation of hat-stiffened composite panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.068 ↗
55. Single-stringer compression specimen for the assessment of damage tolerane of postbuckling structures10.2514/1.C031106 ↗
56. Semi-analytical buckling analysis of omega stiffened panels under multi-axial loads10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.003 ↗
57. Carbon fiber sailboat hulls: How to optimize the use of an expensive material
58. Qi · 2018
59. On the influence of flow-front orientation on stringer stiffened composite panels in water impacts10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117797 ↗
60. Allen T, Battley M, Casari P, Kerling B, Stenius I, Westlund J. Structural responses of high performance sailing yachts to slamming loads. In: 11th international conference on fast sea transportation, FAST 2011 - proceedings. (April 2015):ISBN: 9780985066000, 2011, p. 585–92.
61. International Monohull Open Class Association (IMOCA) · 2021
62. ASTM · 2016
63. ASTM · 2014
64. ASTM · 2020
65. Tensile behaviour of anti-symmetric CFRP composite10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.310 ↗
66. Damiano · 2023
67. W. · 1968
68. A general theory of stength for anisotrpoic materials10.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
69. Dassault Systemes · 2016
70. Experimental and numerical study on compression-after-impact behavior of composite panels with foam-filled hat-stiffener
71. Gurit · 2015
72. Adhesive Technologies N.Z. Ltd. · 2016
73. Gurit · 2016
74. Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies10.1115/1.2910291 ↗
75. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretisation in CFD applications
76. The strength of multilayered composites under a plane-stress state10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00191-7 ↗
77. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00217-3 ↗
78. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
79. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
80. Physically based non-linear stress–strain relations for the inter-fibre fracture analysis of FRP laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.008 ↗
81. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
82. Failure of composite materials10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00302.x ↗
83. Numerical modelling of woven composites: Biaxial loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.017 ↗
84. Initial failure strength prediction of woven composites using a new yarn failure criterion constructed by deep learning10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111505 ↗
85. A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminates in aircraft composite structures10.1007/s00170-017-0096-5 ↗
86. Determination of the longitudinal non linear elastic behaviour and compressive strength of a CFRP ply by bending tests on laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107863 ↗
87. Hibbeler · 2014
88. Damage deflection and subsequent damage diffusion in carbon–boron fibre hybrid composites under longitudinal compression10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112025 ↗
89. On the high compressive strains achieved in bending tests on unidirectional carbon-fibre/epoxy10.1016/0266-3538(92)90093-I ↗