Efficiency Research of Conformal Channel Geometries Produced by Additive Manufacturing in Plastic Injection Mold Cores (Inserts) Used in Automotive Industry
Source abstract
Abstract
In the production of geometries that traditional methods cannot produce, it is seen that additive manufacturing (AM) technology, which has come to the fore, has been used extensively in conformal cooling channel (CCC) applications in recent years. This study, conducted within the scope of CCC's use of applied mold cores in automotive industry plastic part production, aimed to reduce the cycle time in the injection printing process. The v1 geometry, which gives the analysis results for ideal printing quality from the channel geometries developed with three different design approaches, is produced with direct metal laser sintering, which is an AM laser sintering technology, and the injection printing cycle time has been reduced by 38%. CCC applied the study's primary motivation to develop duct geometry to provide balanced cooling in the automotive industry's mold cores produced with AM. It is known that the Computer Numerical Control machining process in traditional mold methods does not allow the processing of the channels in the internal geometries, and the deep areas where the heat is concentrated cannot be cooled sufficiently. In the study, CCC geometries where AM design parameters are used effectively and the balanced cooling performance expected from the die core can be achieved. The effects of different geometries on production are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aluminium Test, Training and Research Center (ALUTEAM), Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Building Physics and Material, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey.
CAVO Otomotiv Tic. ve San. A.S., Cayirova, Kocaeli, Turkey.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1051/matecconf/20181970801910.1051/matecconf/201819708019 ↗
2. 10.1590/0104-1428.0831910.1590/0104-1428.08319 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-021-06762-810.1007/s00170-021-06762-8 ↗
4. Colmenero JJM, , Alba AT, , Requena JC, et al. A new conformal cooling systen for plastic collimators based on the use of complex geometries and optimization of temperature profiles. Polymers, 2021; 13:1–27.
5. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.31610.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.316 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12239-012-0027-210.1007/s12239-012-0027-2 ↗
7. Berins ML. Plastics Engineering Handbook of the Society of the Plastics Industry. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991.10.1007/978-1-4615-7604-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.078 ↗
9. Hazwan MHM, , Shayfull Z, , Sharif S, et al. Warpage optimisation on the moulded part with straight-drilled and conformal cooling channels using response surface methodology (RSM) and genetic algorithm (GA) optimisation approaches. AIP Conf Proc, 2017; 1885:1–12.
10. Purav C, , Singraur DS, , Sudhakar DSS. Investigations into performance of conventional and conformal cooling channels of a plastic injection mold. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021, Vancouver, 2021; 1070:1–16.10.1088/1757-899X/1070/1/012122 ↗
11. Phull GS, , Kumar S, , Walia RS. Conformal cooling for molds produced by additive manufacturing: A review. Int J Mech Eng Technol, 2018; 9:1162–1172.
12. 10.1002/adv.2138110.1002/adv.21381 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10914710.1016/j.matdes.2020.109147 ↗
14. Shinde MS, , Ashtankar KM. Additive manufacturing-assisted conformal cooling channels in mold manufacturing processes. Adv Mech Eng, 2017; 9–5:1–14.10.1177/1687814017699764 ↗
15. 10.1155/2014/96848410.1155/2014/968484 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40436-019-00277-y10.1007/s40436-019-00277-y ↗
17. 10.1007/s40436-018-0213-110.1007/s40436-018-0213-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.07910.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.079 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.12810.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.128 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-019-04697-910.1007/s00170-019-04697-9 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00170-020-05114-210.1007/s00170-020-05114-2 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40964-020-00129-310.1007/s40964-020-00129-3 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-019-03614-410.1007/s00170-019-03614-4 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00170-013-5523-710.1007/s00170-013-5523-7 ↗
25. 10.3390/mi1203031110.3390/mi12030311 ↗
26. 10.1002/maco.20191117110.1002/maco.201911171 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.12108210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121082 ↗
28. Zhang C, , Wang S, , Li J, et al. Additive manufacturing of products with functional fluid channels: A review. Addit Manuf, 2020; 36:101490.
29. 10.35378/gujs.62193010.35378/gujs.621930 ↗
30. Gao M, , Li L, , Wang Q, et al. Integration of additive manufacturing in casting: Advances, challenges, and prospects. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol 2021.
31. 10.1007/s13369-020-04396-810.1007/s13369-020-04396-8 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00170-021-06720-410.1007/s00170-021-06720-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.02010.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.020 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12289-020-01604-610.1007/s12289-020-01604-6 ↗
35. 10.3934/mbe.202029210.3934/mbe.2020292 ↗
36. Tuteski O, , Kočov A. Conformal cooling channels in injection molding tools—design considerations. Mach Technol Mater, 2018; 12:445–448.
37. Ansari A, , Modarress B. The impact of a continuous design change on environment sustainability. Sustain (United States), 2019; 12:252–258.
38. EOS GmbH—Electro Optical Systems. Material data sheet EOS MaragingSteel MS1. EOS, 2011; 49:1–6.
39. 10.1007/s00170-021-07057-810.1007/s00170-021-07057-8 ↗
40. EOS. Design rules for DMLS. EOS Electro Opt Syst, 2004; 0204:1–14.
41. Crucible. Design guidelines for DMLS. Crucible Industr Design, 2014:1–22.
42. 10.1007/s00170-021-07928-010.1007/s00170-021-07928-0 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.02010.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.020 ↗
44. Park HS Dang XP. Design and simulation-based optimization of cooling channels for plastic injection mold. In: New Technologies—Trends Innovations and Research Constantin Volosencu IntechOpen DOI: 10.5772/32730. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/34669 Citeseer. 2012; pp. 19–44.10.5772/32730 ↗
45. 10.1590/0104-1428.204710.1590/0104-1428.2047 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma1323553310.3390/ma13235533 ↗
47. 10.3390/met910104210.3390/met9101042 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.03310.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.033 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.03410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.034 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00170-020-06309-310.1007/s00170-020-06309-3 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.04210.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.042 ↗
52. Sirin TB, , Kaynak Y. Surface integrity and wear resistance of maraging steel produced by additive manufacturing direct metal laser sintering. J Adv Manuf Eng, 2020; 3:83–92.
53. 10.1002/srin.20200019510.1002/srin.202000195 ↗
54. 10.3390/met1002021810.3390/met10020218 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.08210.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.082 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.009 ↗