FE homogenized limit analysis model for masonry strengthened by near surface bed joint FRP bars
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A homogenized limit analysis model for the prediction of collapse loads and failure mechanisms of masonry walls reinforced with near surface bed joint GFRP bars is presented. Reinforced masonry homogenized failure surfaces are obtained by means of a compatible identification procedure, where each brick is supposed interacting with its six neighbors by means of finite thickness mortar joints, filler epoxy resin and FRP rods. In the framework of the kinematic theorem of limit analysis, a simple constrained minimization problem is obtained on the unit cell, suitable to estimate – with a very limited computational effort – reinforced masonry homogenized failure surfaces. A FE strategy is adopted to solve the homogenization problem at a cell level, modeling joints, bricks, filler and FRP rods by means of eight-noded infinitely resistant parallelepiped elements. A possible jump of velocities is assumed at the interfaces between contiguous elements, where plastic dissipation occurs. For mortar and bricks interfaces, a frictional behavior with possible limited tensile and compressive strength is assumed, whereas for epoxy resin and FRP bars some formulas available in the literature are adopted in order to take into account in an approximate but effective way, the delamination of the bar from the epoxy and the failure of the filler at the interface with the joint. In order to validate the model proposed, two meaningful examples are critically analyzed. The first relies on a reinforced masonry beam in four-point bending, whereas the second is a full scale wall constrained at three edges and loaded until failure with a distributed out-of-plane pressure. While the first example is useful to test the model at a cell level, since only horizontal ultimate bending moment is involved in the failure mechanism, the second provides a full assessment of the procedure proposed at a structural level. In both cases, very good agreement is found with literature data, meaning that the model proposed may provide useful information for all practitioners interested in the design of masonry walls reinforced with bed joint FRP bars.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Doglioni · 1994
2. Schwegler G. Masonry construction strengthened with composites in seismically endangered zone. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, Wien; 1994. p. 2299–303.
3. Eshani MR. Strengthening of earthquake damaged masonry structures with composite materials. In: Proceedings nonmetallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures. Proceedings of the second international RILEM symposium FRPRCS-2; 1997. p. 681–7.
4. Strengthening techniques tested on masonry structures struck by the Umbria–Marche earthquake of 1997–199810.1016/S0950-0618(02)00014-4 ↗
5. Binda L, Modena C, Valluzzi MR, Zago R. Mechanical effects of bed joint steel reinforcement in historic brick masonry structures. In: Structural faults+repair 99, 8th international conference, London, UK; 1999.
6. Composites: a new possibility for the shear strengthening of concrete, masonry and wood10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00017-7 ↗
7. In-plane loaded CFRP reinforced masonry walls: mechanical characteristics by homogenisation procedures10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.009 ↗
8. CNR-DT200 · 2006
9. Out-of-plane behavior of URM walls strengthened with FRP bars
10. Tinazzi D, Modena C, Nanni A. Strengthening of masonry assemblages with FRP rods and laminates. In: International meeting on composite materials, PLAST 2000, advancing with composites 2000, Crivelli-Visconti I. (Ed.), Milan, Italy; May 9–11, 2000. p. 411–8.
11. Tinazzi D, Arduini M, Modena C, Nanni A. FRP-structural repointing of masonry assemblages. In: 3rd International conference advanced composite materials in bridges and structures; 2000. p. 585–92.
12. Flexural and shear strengthening of un-reinforced masonry with FRP bars10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.042 ↗
13. Tumialan · 2002
14. Tumialan JG, Huang PC, Nanni A, Silva P. Strengthening of masonry walls with structural repointing, non-metallic reinforcement for concrete structures – FRPRCS-5, Cambridge, UK; July 16–18, 2001.10.1061/40558(2001)130 ↗
15. Near-surface mounted FRP reinforcement: an emerging technique for strengthening structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.003 ↗
16. A modified pull-out test for bond of near-surface mounted FRP rods in concrete10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00052-5 ↗
17. Homogenization approach for the limit analysis of out-of-plane loaded masonry walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:10(1650) ↗
18. Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls. Part I: failure surfaces10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.005 ↗
19. Homogenized limit analysis of FRP-reinforced masonry walls out-of-plane loaded10.1007/s00466-008-0334-7 ↗
20. Damage of masonry panels reinforced by FRP sheets10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00137-6 ↗
21. A Reissner–Mindlin limit analysis model for out-of-plane loaded running bond masonry walls10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.033 ↗
22. Limit analysis of frictional block assemblies as a mathematical program with complementarity constraints10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00111-3 ↗
23. Three-dimensional limit analysis of rigid blocks assemblages. Part I: torsion failure on frictional joints and limit analysis formulation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.010 ↗
24. Rehabilitation of masonry walls using unobtrusive FRP techniques for enhanced out-of-plane seismic resistance10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:3(213) ↗
25. Load–displacement of masonry panels with unbonded, intermittently bonded FRP I: analytical model10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(15) ↗
26. Suquet P. Analyse limite et homogeneisation. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences – Series IIB – Mechanics, vol. 296; 1983. p. 1355–58.
27. A multi-surface interface model for the analysis of masonry structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:7(660) ↗
28. Blaschko M. Bond behaviour of CFRP strips glued into slits. In: Proceedings of FRPRCS-6. Singapore: World Scientific; 2003. p. 205–14.10.1142/9789812704863_0017 ↗
29. Investigation of bond in concrete structures strengthened with near surface mounted carbon fiber reinforced polymer strips10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:3(248) ↗
30. Mesoscopic study on historic masonry10.12989/sem.2008.30.1.099 ↗