Uniaxial tension and compression characterization of hybrid CNS–glass fiber–epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, unidirectional multi-scale, carbon nanostructure (CNS)–glass fiber–epoxy, composites were manufactured using a novel in-line continuous production scalable chemical vapor deposition based CNS manufacturing process. The processing parameters peculiar to the growth system, specifically growth chamber temperature, catalyst concentration and line speed, were varied to observe the effect on the CNS growth and parent filament degradation. Unidirectional tension and compression tests were conducted to measure the strength and modulus in the filament direction and failure mechanisms of the hybrid materials identified. Based on the results of tensile tests, gains in tensile strength and tensile modulus are achieved through a uniform coverage of short CNS. The greatest increases in CNS-enhanced composite compressive strength can be achieved through the combination of low weight percent CNS on the fiber and minimal parent filament environmental degradation. For stiffness governed applications, these CNS-enhanced composites may not provide the ideal solution. However, applications which demand significant deformation prior to failure or damage tolerance can benefit from the properties afforded by these CNS–fiber–epoxy composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Ultralong single-wall carbon nanotubes10.1038/nmat1216 ↗
2. Nanomechanics of carbon nanotubes and composites10.1115/1.1538625 ↗
3. Mechanics of carbon nanotubes10.1115/1.1490129 ↗
4. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
5. A review on carbon epoxy nanocomposites10.1177/0731684407085417 ↗
6. Nanocomposites in context10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
7. Carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid multiscale composites10.1063/1.1466880 ↗
8. Kim · 2009
9. Zhang Q et al. Carbon nanotubes on carbon fibers: influence of growth conditions on fiber tensile properties. SAMPE fall technical conference; 2007.
10. Haddon, Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Composites10.1021/jp071329a ↗
11. Malecki HC. UMBC – University of Maryland, Baltimore County Masters Thesis. In situ growth of carbon nanotubes on dynamic glass fiber substrates; 2010.
12. Malecki HC, Zupan M, Scalable Continuous Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on Moving Fiber Substrates, Composites: Part A (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.019.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.019 ↗
13. ASTM D3039M-08. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
14. ASTM D6641M-09. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture.
15. Rosen · 1965
16. Kinking as a mode of structural degradation in carbon fiber composites10.1016/0001-6160(78)90023-8 ↗
17. Micromechanics10.1016/0045-7949(83)90141-4 ↗
18. Compressive failure of fibre composites10.1016/0022-5096(93)90068-Q ↗
19. A model for kinking in fiber composites; I. Fiber breakage via microbuckling; II. Kink band formation10.1016/0020-7683(90)90028-T ↗
20. Prediction of compressive strength and kink bands in composites using a work potential10.1016/0020-7683(94)00158-S ↗
21. Daniel · 1994