journal article·2021-07

Static load-bearing capacity formulation for steel tubular T/Y-joints strengthened with GFRP and CFRP

Alireza Sadat Hosseini, Mohammad Reza Bahaari, Mohammad Lesani, Pouria Hajikarimi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Based on full-scale experiments on steel tubular T/Y-joints wrapped with FRP , nonlinear finite element (FE) models were verified and calibrated for prediction of the static load-bearing capacity (SLC) of FRP-strengthened joints. The verified FE methodology was utilized to perform parametric studies . Due to the fact that local buckling of the chord member is the governing mode of failure in tubular joints capacity, FRP strengthening on the chord is determining while brace strengthening showed negligible effects . Increasing the brace-to-chord diameter ratio ( β), chord diameter-to-thickness ratio (γ), and brace inclination angle (θ) enhanced the joint capacity but decreased the FRP effectiveness on the joint capacity improvement. Based on the results of the experimentally-verified numerical analyses and parametric studies, three indices ψ, λ and δ were introduced as strengthening index, FRP fibers orientation and the stacking sequence, to represent the effective parameters respectively. Multiplying these indices by the unstrengthened joint capacity constitutes a practical and efficient formulation for estimating the SLC of FRP strengthened joints. Since a large number of FE models were generated and analyzed, the presented formulas can be employed for FRP optimal application on tubular joints, while providing a guideline for the assessment of the strengthened joint SLC.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Wardenier · 2002
2. G. W. Cooper, “New Study Shows Why Fixed Platforms Fail During Storms,” Oil Gas J., vol. 65, no. 42, 1967.
3. Detail investigation on un-stiffened T/Y tubular joints behavior under axial compressive loads10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.016 ↗
4. Progress in the technique of upgrading metallic structures with advanced polymer composites10.1002/pse.112 ↗
5. State-of-the-art review on FRP strengthened steel structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.006 ↗
6. CFRP strengthening of rectangular steel tubes subjected to end bearing loads: effect of adhesive properties and finite element modelling10.1016/j.tws.2008.10.008 ↗
7. Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.011 ↗
8. Design of short CFRP-reinforced steel tubular columns10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.09.005 ↗
9. FRP-strengthened metallic structures
10. Experimental investigation of FRP-strengthened tubular T-joints under axial compressive loads10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.097 ↗
11. FRP wrapping for the rehabilitation of Circular Hollow Section (CHS) tubular steel connections10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.013 ↗
12. Stress concentration factors in FRP-strengthened offshore steel tubular T-joints under various brace loadings10.1016/j.istruc.2019.07.004 ↗
13. Experimental and parametric studies of SCFs in FRP strengthened tubular T-joints under axially loaded brace
14. Slender steel columns strengthened using high-modulus CFRP plates for buckling control10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:1(2) ↗
15. Numerical studies on CFRP strengthened steel circular members under marine environment10.1617/s11527-015-0781-5 ↗
16. Parametric study of FRP strengthening on stress concentration factors in an offshore tubular T-joint subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane bending moments10.1007/s13296-019-00244-0 ↗
17. Stress concentration factors in FRP-strengthened steel tubular KT-joints10.1016/j.apor.2021.102525 ↗
18. Hysteretic behaviour of tubular joints under cyclic loading10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.12.002 ↗
19. Numerical investigation of FRP-strengthened tubular T-joints under axial compressive loads10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.020 ↗
20. Experimental and numerical investigation on behavior of CFRP-strengthened circular hollow section gap K-joints10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.020 ↗
21. Numerical analysis and formulae for SCF reduction coefficients of CFRP-strengthened CHS gap K-joints10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110369 ↗
22. Experimental study and strength evaluation of axially loaded welded tubular joints with round-ended oval hollow sections10.1016/j.tws.2020.106846 ↗
23. Study on out-of-plane flexural stiffness of unstiffened multi-planar CHS X-joints10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.023 ↗
24. Effects of brace-to-chord angle on capacity of multi-planar CHS X-joints under out-of-plane bending moments10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110434 ↗
25. Experimental and numerical investigations of the compressive behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened tubular steel T-joints10.1007/s11709-020-0663-y ↗
26. Study on the cyclic bending behaviour of CFRP strengthened full-scale CHS members10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.015 ↗
27. A novel optimization approach for bonded tubular gap K-joints made of FRP composites10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.021 ↗
28. Hand layup: understanding the manual process
29. Cost reduction in manufacturing of aerospace composites10.1179/174328911X12988622801052 ↗
30. “ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual, Version 6.14. Providence, RI: Simulia; 2014.”
31. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
32. “API (American Petroleum Institute). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms – working stress design, API RP 2A WSD, 22nd edition, November 2014.”
33. Bates · 1988 · vol. 2
34. Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.039 ↗