Hydrostructural optimization of subcavitating cambered and symmetric composite foils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems · Rocket and propulsion systems research · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. UNCTAD · 2020
2. Walker · 2018
3. The microstructure of the ocean10.1038/scientificamerican0273-64 ↗
4. Semi-diurnal and diurnal tidal dissipation from topex/poseidon altimetry10.1029/2003GL017676 ↗
5. Tidal power technology review with potential applications in gulf stream10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.150 ↗
6. A review on the technologies, design considerations and numerical models of tidal current turbines10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.155 ↗
7. Stratiotis · 2020
8. Adaptive composite marine propulsors and turbines: Progress and challenges10.1115/1.4034659 ↗
9. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
10. Aerostructural design exploration of a wing in transonic flow10.3390/aerospace7080118 ↗
11. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
12. Modelling of fatigue damage progression and life of cfrp laminates10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00585.x ↗
13. Role of matrix resin in delamination onset and growth in composite laminates10.1016/0266-3538(88)90043-7 ↗
14. 2014
15. Yamatogi T, Murayama H, Uzawa K, Kageyama K, Watanabe N. Study on cavitation erosion of composite materials for marine propeller. In: The 17th international conference on composites (ICCM-17). Edinburgh, UK; 2009.
16. Young YL. Hydroelastic response of lifting bodies in separated flows. In: NATO-AVT-307: symposium on separated flow: prediction, measurement and assessment for air and sea. Trondheim, Norway; 2019.
17. The hydroelastic response of a surface-piercing hydrofoil in multiphase flows, part 2. modal parameters and generalized fluid forces
18. Wave effects on the hydroelastic response of a surface-piercing hydrofoil. part 2. cavitating and ventilating flows10.1017/jfm.2023.254 ↗
19. Parametric excitations and lock-in of flexible hydrofoils in two-phase flows10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.06.004 ↗
20. The influence of fluid–structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a stiff hydrofoil. part 1.10.1017/jfm.2020.321 ↗
21. The influence of fluid–structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a flexible hydrofoil. part 2.10.1017/jfm.2020.323 ↗
22. The influence of fluid–structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a stiff hydrofoil. part 3
23. Kerwin · 2010
24. Multi-fidelity optimization of super-cavitating hydrofoils10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.009 ↗
25. Wing sections for hydrofoils–part 1: Symmetrical profiles10.5957/jsr.1979.23.3.209 ↗
26. Wing sections for hydrofoils - part 2: Nonsymmetrical profiles10.5957/jsr.1981.25.3.191 ↗
27. The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layer10.1017/S0022112059000015 ↗
28. The use of numerical optimization in advanced blade section design
29. Martins · 2022
30. Carlton · 2018
31. Design and hydrodynamic performance of a horizontal axis hydrokinetic turbine10.15282/ijame.16.2.2019.1.0488 ↗
32. Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow
33. A design method for high-speed propulsor blades10.1115/1.2820698 ↗
34. XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils
35. Eppler · 1980
36. RANS-based optimization of a T-shaped hydrofoil considering junction design10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112051 ↗
37. Static hydroelastic study of composite t-foils with beam and lifting line models10.59490/imdc.2024.900 ↗
38. Utilization of bend-twist coupling for performance enhancement of composite marine propellers10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.04.005 ↗
39. Utilizing fluid–structure interactions to improve energy efficiency of composite marine propellers in spatially varying wake10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.03.011 ↗
40. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a 3D composite hydrofoil via variable accuracy architecture
41. Smoothed finite element and genetic algorithm based optimization for shape adaptive composite marine propellers10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.016 ↗
42. Structural strength and laminate optimization of self-twisting composite hydrofoils using a genetic algorithm10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.012 ↗
43. Flexible hydrofoil optimization for the 35th America’s Cup with constrained EGO method10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.047 ↗
44. High-fidelity multipoint hydrostructural optimization of a 3-D hydrofoil10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.02.001 ↗
45. Experimental investigation of a hydrofoil designed via hydrostructural optimization10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.10.010 ↗
46. 3-D high-fidelity hydrostructural optimization of cavitation-free composite lifting surfaces10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113937 ↗
47. Hydrostructural optimization of single-layer and multi-layer composite lifting surfaces10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116650 ↗
48. Brockett T. Minimum pressure envelopes for modified NACA-66 sections with NACA a=0.8 camber and buships type 1 and 2 sections. Technical report, 1966, http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ad0629379.10.21236/AD0629379 ↗
49. Scalable parallel approach for high-fidelity steady-state aeroelastic analysis and adjoint derivative computations10.2514/1.J052255 ↗
50. Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.002 ↗
51. Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes10.1007/s00158-012-0763-y ↗
52. Efficient mesh generation and deformation for aerodynamic shape optimization10.2514/1.J059491 ↗
53. Kenway GK, Kennedy GJ, Martins JRRA. A CAD-free approach to high-fidelity aerostructural optimization. In: Proceedings of the 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis optimization conference, AIAA 2010-9231. fort worth, TX; 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-9231.10.2514/6.2010-9231 ↗
54. PyGeo: A geometry package for multidisciplinary design optimization10.21105/joss.05319 ↗
55. A fast mesh deformation method using explicit interpolation10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.021 ↗
56. ADflow: An open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for aerodynamic and multidisciplinary optimization
57. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows
58. Schlichting · 1955
59. Dissipation and time step scaling strategies for low and high Mach number flows10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112358 ↗
60. Adjoint-based hull design for wake optimisation10.1179/str.2011.58.1.003 ↗
61. Adjoint rans with filtered shape derivatives for hydrodynamic optimisation10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.041 ↗
62. Kröger J, Stück A, Rung T. Adjoint aftship re-design for wake optimisation under the influence. In: International conference on computational methods in marine engineering. 2011.10.1179/str.2011.58.1.003 ↗
63. Adjoint volume-of-fluid approaches for the hydrodynamic optimisation of ships10.1080/09377255.2017.1411001 ↗
64. Adjoint complement to the volume-of-fluid method for immiscible flows10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110411 ↗
65. Adjoint node-based shape optimization of free-floating vessels10.1007/s00158-022-03338-2 ↗
66. Nadarajah S, Jameson A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 38th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, NV; 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-667.10.2514/6.2000-667 ↗
67. A parallel finite-element framework for large-scale gradient-based design optimization of high-performance structures10.1016/j.finel.2014.04.011 ↗
68. Viscous fluid structure interaction response of composite hydrofoils10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.043 ↗
69. SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization10.1137/S1052623499350013 ↗
70. SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization10.1137/S0036144504446096 ↗
71. Gill · 2007
72. PyOptSparse: a Python framework for large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization of sparse systems10.21105/joss.02564 ↗
73. High-fidelity hydrodynamic shape optimization of a 3-D hydrofoil10.5957/jsr.2015.59.4.209 ↗
74. Cfd-based design optimization of ducted hydrokinetic turbines10.1038/s41598-023-43724-4 ↗
75. High-fidelity aerostructural optimization studies of the aerion AS2 supersonic business jet
76. Bons NP, Martins JRRA. Aerostructural wing design exploration with multidisciplinary design optimization. In: Proceedings of the AIAA sciTech forum. Orlando, FL; 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0544.10.2514/6.2020-0544 ↗
77. Aerostructural wing optimization of a regional jet considering mission fuel burn10.1115/1.4055630 ↗
78. Geometrically nonlinear high-fidelity aerostructural optimization for highly flexible wings
79. Gray AC, Riso C, Jonsson E, Martins JRRA, Cesnik CES. High-fidelity aerostructural optimization with a geometrically nonlinear flutter constraint. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics (IFASD 2022). Madrid, Spain; 2022.
80. High-fidelity aerostructural optimization with a geometrically nonlinear flutter constraint10.2514/1.J062127 ↗
81. Gray AC, Kennedy GJ, Martins JRRA. Geometrically nonlinear high-fidelity aerostructural optimization including geometric design variables. In: AIAA aviation forum. San Diego, CA; 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-3316.10.2514/6.2023-3316 ↗
82. Towards aerostructural optimization for urban air mobility vehicle design
83. Towards mixed-fidelity aero-structural-acoustic optimization for urban air mobility vehicle design
84. Towards passive aeroelastic tailoring of large wind turbines using high-fidelity multidisciplinary design optimization
85. Mangano · 2024
86. Experimental study of the steady fluid–structure interaction of flexible hydrofoils10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.09.009 ↗
87. Dynamic hydroelastic scaling of self-adaptive composite marine rotors10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.001 ↗
88. Scaling of the transient hydroelastic response and failure mechanisms of self-adaptive composite marine propellers10.1155/2012/632856 ↗
89. Scaling the dynamic response and stability of composite hydrodynamic lifting surfaces10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115148 ↗
90. Christensen · 2012
91. Multimodality in aerodynamic wing design optimization
92. The computation of induced drag with nonplanar and deformed wakes
93. Anderson · 1991
94. Buffet-onset constraint formulation for aerodynamic shape optimization10.2514/1.J055172 ↗
95. Kreisselmeier G, Steinhauser R. Systematic control design by optimizing a vector performance index. In: International federation of active controls symposium on computer-aided design of control systems. Zurich, Switzerland; 1979, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)65584-8.10.1016/B978-0-08-024488-4.50022-X ↗
96. An evaluation of constraint aggregation strategies for wing box mass minimization10.1007/s00158-016-1495-1 ↗
97. Tsai · 1980
98. Improved constraint-aggregation methods10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.017 ↗
99. Expected drag minimization for aerodynamic design optimization based on aircraft operational data10.1016/j.ast.2017.01.006 ↗
100. Multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the Common Research Model wing10.2514/1.J054154 ↗