Crashworthiness performance of bio-inspired BCC lattice structures: Comparative evaluation of aluminum, neat jute epoxy, and hybrid glass/jute epoxy composite structures
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing demand for lightweight and sustainable crashworthy structures in the automotive sector, especially for electric vehicles, requires new material geometry combinations that balance safety and efficiency. This study investigates the crashworthiness performance of bio-inspired Body-Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice structures fabricated from aluminum, neat jute/epoxy, and hybrid glass/jute/epoxy composites. The objective was to evaluate how material composition and geometric variation influence crushing behavior to identify lightweight and sustainable alternatives for energy absorption applications. Two configurations were developed for each material: a solid center ring (BCC-A) design and a cut ring (BCC-B) design. Composite laminates were fabricated using the resin transfer molding (RTM) process, and the desired BCC lattice configurations were shaped using waterjet cutting. Quasi-static compression tests were conducted to evaluate energy absorption (EA), specific energy absorption (SEA), initial peak force (IPF), crush force efficiency (CFE), and failure mechanisms. The results showed that aluminum structures achieved the highest SEA values in the range of 0.38–0.41 J/g; however, their high IPF and weight values limited their use as lightweight crash structures. Neat jute composites exhibited brittle failure, characterized by the lowest SEA values and distinct brittle and catastrophic fractures. However, hybrid composites demonstrated superior crash performance among the composites, with the cut-ring hybrid (BCC-B-HD) achieving the highest SEA among composites at 0.29 J/g, approximately 26 % higher than the uncut hybrid. The cut-ring modification was especially effective in enhancing CFE by promoting progressive collapse. These results point out the benefit of combining hybridization with bio-inspired geometry to create lightweight and sustainable crashworthy structures in electric vehicle crash zones and battery protection systems, where weight reduction and energy absorption must be balanced.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. NHTSA. United States Department of Transportation: Test Procedures. Accessed: Jun. 16, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-manufacturers/test-procedures.
2. IEA. Global EV Outlook 2024. Paris, 2024.
3. A review of improvements on electric vehicle battery10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34806 ↗
4. Mechanical safety prediction of a battery-pack system under low speed frontal impact via machine learning10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.12.031 ↗
5. Crush and crash analysis of an automotive battery-pack enclosure for lightweight design10.1080/13588265.2020.1812253 ↗
6. Energy absorption characteristics of a bio-inspired prepreg carbon fiber crash box under quasi-static axial compression
7. Crashworthiness analysis of thin-walled aluminum columns filled with aluminum–silicon carbide composite foam10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116102 ↗
8. Development of multi aluminium foam-filled crash box systems to improve crashworthiness performance of road Service vehicle10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105433 ↗
9. O. Laban, E. Mahdi, S. Samim, and J.-J. Cabibihan. A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells. 2021. doi: 10.3390/ma14040883.10.3390/ma14040883 ↗
10. Experimental study on crashworthiness of empty/aluminum foam/honeycomb-filled CFRP tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.019 ↗
11. Quasi-static and low-velocity axial crushing of polyurethane foam-filled aluminium/CFRP composite tubes: an experimental study10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116083 ↗
12. Impact response of additively manufactured metallic hybrid lattice materials10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.007 ↗
13. A review of the crashworthiness performance of energy absorbing composite structure within the context of materials, manufacturing and maintenance for sustainability10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113081 ↗
14. Crashworthiness study of aluminum foam-filled tubular lattice structures based on triply periodic minimal surface metamaterials under lateral crushing10.1016/j.tws.2024.111616 ↗
15. Crashworthiness investigations for 3D printed multi-layer multi-topology carbon fiber nylon lattice materials
16. Design, characterisation, and crushing performance of hexagonal-quadrilateral lattice-filled steel/CFRP hybrid structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112631 ↗
17. Current research status on advanced lattice structures for impact and energy absorption applications: a systematic review10.1016/j.tws.2025.113490 ↗
18. Energy absorption capability of date palm leaf fiber reinforced epoxy composites rectangular tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111004 ↗
19. Mechanically robust lattices inspired by deep-sea glass sponges10.1038/s41563-020-0798-1 ↗
20. Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired thin-walled tubes based on Morpho wings microstructures10.1080/15397734.2020.1822184 ↗
21. J. S. Galsin. Chapter 1 - Crystal Structure of Solids. J. S. B. T.-S. S. P. Galsin, Ed., Academic Press, 2019, pp. 1–36. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817103-5.00001-3.10.1016/B978-0-12-817103-5.00001-3 ↗
22. Crashworthiness unit cell design investigation for energy absorption analysis10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.151 ↗
23. In-plane crashworthiness study of bio-inspired metallic lattice structure based on deep-sea glass sponge10.1016/j.tws.2024.112505 ↗
24. The deformation mechanism, energy absorption behavior and optimal design of vertical-reinforced lattices10.1016/j.tws.2023.110988 ↗
25. Mechanisms of low-frequency bandgap formation and energy absorption of three-dimensional nested hybrid lattice structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112045 ↗
26. Axial crushing response of carbon/glass hybrid composite tubes: an experimental and multi-scale computational study10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115640 ↗
27. Axial compressive behavior and energy absorption of syntactic foam-filled GFRP tubes with lattice frame reinforcement10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116080 ↗
28. Crashworthiness of GFRP composite tubes after aggressive environmental aging in seawater and soil10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115105 ↗
29. Glass-fiber mat/PA6 composite tubes subjected to dynamic axial crush loading—Experimental evaluation and high fidelity modeling of failure phenomena10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117115 ↗
30. Khalasa date palm leaf fiber as a potential reinforcement for polymeric composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113501 ↗
31. A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites: an eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271 ↗
32. Thin-walled structures: lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: a state-of-the-art review and outlook10.1016/j.tws.2021.108760 ↗
33. Quasi-static lateral crushing of non-woven kenaf fibre reinforced composite hexagonal tubes
34. A. Mache and A. Deb. A Comparative Study on the Axial Impact Performance of Jute and Glass Fiber-Based Composite Tubes. in SAE 2013 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE International, Apr. 2013. Doi: 10.4271/2013-01-1178.10.4271/2013-01-1178 ↗
35. Thin-walled structures lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: a state-of-the-art review and outlook10.1016/j.tws.2021.108760 ↗
36. Predictive modeling of jute-polyester composite tubes for impact performance: a comprehensive finite element analysis approach10.1002/pc.27911 ↗
37. An experimental study on performance of jute-polyester composite tubes under axial and transverse impact loading10.1002/pc.25498 ↗
38. Investigation on energy absorption of natural and hybrid fiber under axial static crushing10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.028 ↗
39. The crashworthiness performance of stacking sequence on filament wound hybrid composite energy absorption tube subjected to quasi-static compression load10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.006 ↗
40. An experimental analysis on the transverse crushing behaviour of Nano-filler reinforced composite cylindrical tubular elements
41. Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired multi-order self-similar polymer honeycomb under axial quasi-static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.tws.2024.112877 ↗
42. Crlandis. Types of Unit Cells: Body-Centered Cubic and Face-Centered Cubic (M11Q5). in UW-Madison Chemistry 103/104 Resource Book, 2016, ch. 61.
43. Quasi-static axial crushing investigation of filament-wound eco-friendly energy-absorbing glass fiber and jute fiber composite structures10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.040 ↗
44. D. Aluminum. Aluminium Alloy 1100 H14 Datasheet. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.dinco.ae/resources/aluminium-alloy-1100-data-sheet/.
45. An experimental investigation into crashworthiness of filament wound intra-yarn hybrid glass/jute epoxy composites tubes under quasi-static axial and lateral compression
46. Mechanical properties of interply and intraply hybrid laminates based on jute-glass/epoxy composites10.1186/s44147-023-00293-7 ↗
47. Crushing behavior of GFRP composite-reinforced PVC tubes: experimental testing and numerical simulation10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110903 ↗