journal article·2025-11

Fused filament fabrication of polylactic acid/flax composites: Effects of infill strategy on dynamic and static behavior and energy consumption

Ilaria Papa, Ersilia Cozzolino, Antonello Astarita, Valentina Lopresto

Publisher page

Abstract

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is one of the most widely used Additive Manufacturing (AM) techniques, employing thermoplastic filament to create components. Among its many process parameters, the infill pattern plays a crucial role in determining both the mechanical performance and environmental footprint of printed parts, particularly in energy dissipation and damage behavior under impact. In this context, Natural Fiber Composites (NFCs), such as PLA reinforced with flax, are gaining interest due to their renewable origin, yet their low-velocity impact response and overall process sustainability remain underexplored. This study addresses these gaps by investigating the influence of infill pattern on the flexural and impact behavior of FFF-printed flax-reinforced PLA, while also assessing energy consumption during printing through a gate-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Results show that reducing the infill density of the Solid pattern by 20% leads to a 7.52% reduction in printing energy under constant conditions. Among all tested patterns at 80% infill, the Triangular pattern emerged as the most balanced option, offering favorable mechanical performance with a relatively low environmental impact. These insights aim to support more sustainable design strategies for prototyping and non-structural applications involving biocomposites produced by FFF.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Internal damage evaluation of composite structures using phased array ultrasonic technique: Impact damage assessment in CFRP and 3D printed reinforced composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.091 ↗
2. Non-destructive investigation of thermoplastic reinforced composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.006 ↗
3. Ultrasonic damage investigation on woven jute/poly (lactic acid) composites subjected to low velocity impact10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.076 ↗
4. Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties andtheir optimal selection10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
5. Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
6. The influence of 3D printing process parameters on the mechanical performance of PLA polymer and its correlation with hardness10.1016/j.promfg.2021.07.038 ↗
7. Bio-based and bio-degradable nanofiber materials: a sustainable platform for energy, environmental, and biomedical applications10.1016/j.cej.2024.152105 ↗
8. Influence of the Heated-Bed Material on PLA Mechanical Properties and Energy Consumption in the FDM Process
9. Experimental integrated approach for mechanical characteristic optimization of FDM-printed PLA in an energy-saving perspective10.1007/s00170-022-09535-z ↗
10. Current status and future directions of fused filament fabrication10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.049 ↗
11. Damage resistance of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates subjected to low velocity impact: Effects of laminate thickness and ply-stacking sequence10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.016 ↗
12. Modelling transverse matrix cracking and splitting of cross-ply composite laminates under four point bending10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.11.006 ↗
13. Energy-saving approach for mechanical properties enhancement of recycled PET additively manufactured by MEX
14. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
15. State of the Art: Natural fibre-reinforced composites in advanced development and their physical/chemical/mechanical properties10.1016/j.cjac.2024.100415 ↗
16. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
17. Structural integrity issues of composite materials and structures in future transportation equipment10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118943 ↗
18. Low-velocity impact response of woven Kevlar/epoxy laminated composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes at ambient and low temperatures10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.051 ↗
19. The effect of Hydrothermal Aging on the Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite Pipes10.1007/s10443-021-09923-w ↗
20. Mechanical behavior of the polyamide 6.6 nanofiber and MWCNT-reinforced hybrid nanocomposites10.1002/pc.28090 ↗
21. Overview of 3D additive manufacturing (AM) and corresponding AM composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106114 ↗
22. M. Qamar Tanveer, G. Mishra, S. Mishra, and R. Sharma, “Effect of infill pattern and infill density on mechanical behaviour of FDM 3D printed Parts- a current review,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 62, pp. 100–108, Jan. 2022, 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.02.310.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
23. Impact damage Behavior of Vinyl Ester-, Epoxy-, and Nylon 6-based Basalt Fiber Composites10.1007/s11665-019-04037-8 ↗
24. Impact behaviour and non destructive evaluation of 3D printed reinforced composites
25. Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054 ↗
26. D. Geneletti, “Ecological evaluation for environmental impact assessment,” Nederlandse Geografische Studies, no. 301, 2002, 10.1016/s0195-9255(02)00095-1.
27. Natural fibre reinforced composite materials: Environmentally better life cycle assessment - a case study
28. A. S. Ead, R. Appel, N. Alex, C. Ayranci, and J. P. Carey, “Life cycle analysis for green composites: A review of literature including considerations for local and global agricultural use,” 2021. 10.1177/15589250211026940.10.1177/15589250211026940 ↗
29. A Comparative Study on the Life Cycle Assessment of a 3D Printed Product with PLA, ABS & PETG Materials10.1016/j.procir.2022.04.003 ↗
30. Additive manufacturing of low environmental impact PLA-basalt/hemp biocomposites: life cycle assessment and mechanical properties10.1007/s00170-025-15961-6 ↗
31. Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Printed AlSi10Mg Laser Powder Bed Fusion Jobs in Additive Manufacturing factories10.1007/s11665-025-10867-6 ↗
32. The impact of process parameters on the tensile strength, flexural strength and the manufacturing time of fused filament fabricated (FFF) parts10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.691 ↗
33. M. Qamar Tanveer, G. Mishra, S. Mishra, and R. Sharma, “Effect of infill pattern and infill density on mechanical behaviour of FDM 3D printed Parts- a current review,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 62, pp. 100–108, Jan. 2022, 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.02.310.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
34. ASTM INTERNATIONAL, “Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. D790,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 1–12, 2002.
35. An integrated approach to investigate the energy consumption for manufacturing and surface finishing 3D printed Inconel 718 parts10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.045 ↗
36. Sustainability of Fused Deposition Modeling: the Role of the Plate Material
37. ISO, “Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006),” British Standard, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 32, 2004.
38. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications — a comprehensive review10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
39. Biopolymers: overview of several properties and consequences on their applications10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00107-6 ↗
40. Experimental design and investigation on the mechanical behavior of novel 3D printed biocompatibility polycarbonate scaffolds for medical applications10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.035 ↗
41. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
42. An investigation of combined effect of infill pattern, density, and layer thickness on mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS by fused filament fabrication10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16531 ↗
43. Wahl A, “Life Cycle Impact Assessment – which are the LCIA indicator sets most widely used by practitioners?. iPoint-systems GmbH.”.
44. M. Rybaczewska-Błażejowska and D. Jezierski, “Comparison of ReCiPe 2016, ILCD 2011, CML-IA baseline and IMPACT 2002+ LCIA methods: a case study based on the electricity consumption mix in Europe,” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Oct. 2024, 10.1007/s11367-024-02326-6.10.1007/s11367-024-02326-6 ↗
45. M. T. Mastura, M. R. Alkahari, and A. K. Syahibudil Ikhwan, “Life cycle analysis of fused filament fabrication: A review,” Design for Sustainability: Green Materials and Processes, pp. 415–434, Jan. 2021, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819482-9.00020-4.10.1016/B978-0-12-819482-9.00020-4 ↗
46. Energy consumption of common desktop additive manufacturing technologies