journal article·2019-02Open access

Comparison of numerical modelling techniques for impact investigation on a wind turbine blade

Amrit Shankar Verma, Nils Petter Vedvik, Philipp Ulrich Haselbach, Zhen Gao, Zhiyu Jiang

Abstract

Abstract Wind turbine blades are exposed to numerous impact risks throughout their lifetimes. The impact risks range from bird collisions during operation to impacts with surrounding structures at the time of transportation and installation. Impact loads on the fibre composite blades can induce several complex, simultaneously interacting and visually undetectable damage modes and have a high potential to reduce the local and global blade stiffness. An assessment of such impact-induced damages is therefore necessary and usually involves high computational costs using numerical procedures, especially when analysing large composite components. To minimise this computational expense, different numerical impact modelling techniques are utilised, primarily shell-element-based approaches and multiscale-modelling-based global-local approaches. In this article, a comparison between (1) pure shell, (2) shell-to-solid coupling, and (3) submodelling finite element modelling techniques using Abaqus/Explicit is presented for a case where an impactor hits the leading edge of a blade. A high-fidelity local solid finite element model is developed for the leading edge of a DTU 10 MW blade at the region of impact and its stiffness is compared with baseline. A user material subroutine VUMAT for the intralaminar damage mode based on the Hashin failure criterion is formulated and then validated via an experiment from the literature. Finally, based on different numerical modelling techniques, impact investigations are performed, and the impact responses, damage to the blade and computational analysis durations are compared. It is found that the submodelling-based global-local approach is the most efficient analysis technique for this case, capturing failure modes including delamination, core crushing and local surface indentation in the blade. The findings of this study can be used to develop accurate and computationally efficient tools for modelling impact-induced damage to a blade.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Li · 2016
2. Verma AS, Jiang Z, Vedvik NP, Gao Z, Ren Z. Impact assessment of a wind turbine blade root during an offshore mating process. Accepted in Engineering structures 2018. Elsevier.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.012 ↗
3. Ho · 2017
4. Wind energy in Europe: Scenarios for 2030
5. Darius S. GE unveils market–changing 12 MW offshore wind turbine, http://www.rechargenews.com/wind/1443296/ge-unveils-market-changing-12mw-offshore-wind-turbine (Accessed: 2018-03-01).
6. Haselbach · 2015
7. Brøndsted · 2013
8. Feng · 2014
9. A Global-local damage assessment methodology for impact damage on offshore wind turbine blades during lifting operations
10. Wind turbine blade design10.3390/en5093425 ↗
11. Verma AS, Vedvik NP, Gao Z. Comprehensive numerical investigation of impact behavior of an offshore wind turbine blade due to impact/contact during installation. Under review in Ocean Enginerring.
12. Abrate · 2005
13. Impact damage on fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composite–a review10.1177/0021998312472217 ↗
14. The effect of delaminations on local buckling in wind turbine blades10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.053 ↗
15. Design and manufacture of wind turbine blades, offshore and onshore wind turbines
16. Impact damage in composite aircraft structures–experimental testing and numerical simulation10.1243/0954410981532414 ↗
17. Approaches to damage assessment and damage tolerance for frp sandwich structures10.1177/1099636207070853 ↗
18. McGugan M, Pereira G, Sørensen BF, Toftegaard H, Branner K. Damage tolerance and structural monitoring for wind turbine blades. Phil Trans R Soc A 373(2035).10.1098/rsta.2014.0077 ↗
19. Standard ASTM. D7136: Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM International: West Conshohocken; 2005.
20. Boeing BSS. 7260, Advanced composite compression tests. The Boeing Company: Seattle, WA; 1988.
21. An approach to modelling and predicting impact damage in composite structures
22. Numerical/experimental study of the impact and compression after impact on gfrp composite for wind/marine applications10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.679 ↗
23. A numerical/experimental study on the impact and CAI behaviour of glass reinforced composite plates10.1007/s10443-017-9628-2 ↗
24. Damage development in stitch bonded GFRP composite plates under low velocity impact: experimental and numerical results10.1177/0021998314521474 ↗
25. Barely visible impact damage in scaled composite laminates: Experiments and numerical simulations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.008 ↗
26. Multiple length/time-scale simulation of localized damage in composite structures using a Mesh Superposition Technique10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.005 ↗
27. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: numerical simulations10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015 ↗
28. Criteria for yielding or failure of cellular materials10.1177/1099636207070997 ↗
29. Reddy · 2004
30. Hibbitt H, Karlsson B, Sorensen P. Abaqus analysis user’s manual version; 2016.
31. Damage prediction of horizontal axis marine current turbines under hydrodynamic, hydrostatic and impacts loads10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.015 ↗
32. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
33. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
34. Bird impact study of a preloaded composite wind turbine blade
35. Comparison of shell and solid finite element models for the static certification tests of a 43 m wind turbine blade10.3390/en11061346 ↗
36. Gibbon R, Vaughn L. Using different modelling techniques for the simulation of impact upon composites for aerospace applications. Presented at Innovation in Composites.
37. A two-way loose coupling procedure for investigating the buckling and damage behaviour of stiffened composite panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.056 ↗
38. Efficient progressive failure analysis of multi-stringer stiffened composite panels through a two-way loose coupling global-local approach10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.011 ↗
39. Nie · 2014
40. Experimental and three-dimensional global-local finite element analysis of a composite component including degradation process at the interfaces10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.010 ↗
41. The identification of structurally sensitive zones subject to failure in a wind turbine blade using nodal displacement based finite element sub-modeling10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.065 ↗
42. Sutherland LS. A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part I-Marine impacts on marine composites. Composite Struct 2017. Elsevier.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.073 ↗
43. Bak · 2013
44. Characterization of balsa wood mechanical properties required for continuum damage mechanics analysis
45. Weijermars · 2016
46. Microstructural aspects and modeling of failure in naturally occurring porous composites10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00268-5 ↗
47. Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 ↗
48. Initiation of trailing edge failure in full-scale wind turbine blade test10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.04.041 ↗
49. A constitutive model for transversely isotropic foams, and its application to the indentation of balsa wood10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.11.010 ↗
50. Workbench A et al. Ansys inc. Canonsburg, PA; 2009. Ver 12.
51. Multiscale mechanical problems: the arlequin method10.1016/S1251-8069(99)80046-5 ↗
52. A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.053 ↗
53. The s-version of finite element method for laminated composites10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961115)39:21<3641::AID-NME17>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
54. Multi-scale modelling of sandwich structures using the arlequin method part i: linear modelling10.1016/j.finel.2008.07.003 ↗
55. Multi-scale modelling of sandwich structures using hierarchical kinematics10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.026 ↗