A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part II: the optimisation strategy
Source abstract
Abstract
This work deals with the problem of the optimum design of a sandwich panel. The design strategy that we propose is a numerical optimisation procedure that does not make any simplifying assumption to obtain a true global optimum configuration of the system. To face the design of the sandwich structure at both meso and macro scales, we use a two-level optimisation strategy: at the first level we determine the optimal geometry of the unit cell of the core together with the material and geometric parameters of the laminated skins, while at the second level we determine the optimal skins lay-up giving the geometrical and material parameters issued from the first level. The two-level strategy relies both on the use of the polar formalism for the description of the anisotropic behaviour of the laminates and on the use of a genetic algorithm as optimisation tool to perform the solution search. To prove its effectiveness, we apply our strategy to the least-weight design of a sandwich plate, satisfying several constraints: on the first buckling load, on the positive-definiteness of the stiffness tensor of the core, on the ratio between skins and core thickness and on the admissible moduli for the laminated skins.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen · 1969
2. Minimum weight sandwich beam design10.2514/3.49567 ↗
3. Multi-objective optimisation of vehicle bodies made of frp sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.030 ↗
4. Minimum weight design of foam core sandwich panels for a given strength10.1016/0025-5416(87)90497-6 ↗
5. Vinson · 2005
6. Analysis and optimization of foam-reinforced web core composite sandwich panels under in-plane compressive loads10.1177/1099636202004002030 ↗
7. Optimizing sandwich beams for strength and stiffness10.1177/1099636212449851 ↗
8. Optimal mechanical design of tetrahedral truss cores for sandwich constructions10.1177/1099636213487364 ↗
9. Asadi H, Gorji M, Ashouri D, Khalkhali A, Post buckling modelling and optimization of sandwich panels with corrugated cores. In: 5th WSEAS/IASME international conference on engineering education, Heraklion, Greece; 2008.
10. Weight minimization of sandwich panels with acoustic and mechanical constraints10.1106/CM4M-7JAY-VBTP-37JE ↗
11. Weight optimization of sandwich panel with acoustic constraints, experimental verification10.1106/109963602024578 ↗
12. Weight minimization of large scale sandwich structures with acoustic and mechanical constraints10.1177/1099636203005003003 ↗
13. Process for design optimization of honeycomb core sandwich panels for blast load mitigation10.1007/s00158-012-0845-x ↗
14. Optimal design of honeycomb material used to mitigate head impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.034 ↗
15. Homogenization and optimization of sinusoidal honeycomb cores for transverse shear stiffness10.1177/1099636208092006 ↗
16. Multiple objective optimisation of composite sandwich structures for rail vehicle floor panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.018 ↗
17. Plane anisotropy by the polar method10.1007/s11012-005-2132-z ↗
18. Verchery G, Les invariants des tenseurs d’ordre 4 du type de l’élasticité. In: Proc. of colloque Euromech 115, VIllard-de-Lans, (France); 1979.
19. Montemurro M, Optimal design of advanced engineering modular systems through a new genetic approach [Ph.D. thesis]. UPMC, Paris VI, France. ; 2012
20. A two-level procedure for the global optimum design of composite modular structures – application to the design of an aircraft wing. Part 1: theoretical formulation10.1007/s10957-012-0067-9 ↗
21. A two-level procedure for the global optimum design of composite modular structures – application to the design of an aircraft wing. Part 2: numerical aspects and examples10.1007/s10957-012-0070-1 ↗
22. Tsai SW, Hahn T, Introduction to composite materials, Technomic; 1980.
23. Gibson · 1997
24. Design of elastic properties of laminates with minimum number of plies10.1007/s11029-012-9284-4 ↗
25. Jones · 1975
26. Stiffness design of laminates using the polar method10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00177-9 ↗
27. Catapano A, Stiffness and strength optimisation of the anisotropy distribution for laminated structures [Ph.D. thesis]. UPMC, Paris VI, France. ; 2013.
28. A note on the elastic and geometric bounds for composite laminates10.1007/s10659-012-9406-1 ↗
29. The automatic dynamic penalisation method (ADP) for handling constraints with genetic algorithms10.1016/j.cma.2012.12.009 ↗
30. A two-level procedure for the global optimization of the damping behavior of composite laminated plates with elastomer patches
31. Design of damping properties of hybrid laminates through a global optimisation strategy10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.003 ↗
32. Identification of electromechanical properties of piezoelectric structures through evolutionary optimisation techniques10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.031 ↗
33. ANSYS, Inc., 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, ANSYS Mechanical APDL Modeling and Meshing Guide; 2012.
34. Determination of honeycomb material properties: existing theories and an alternative dynamic approach10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177) ↗
35. HexWeb honeycomb attributes and properties, Duxford, Cambridge, UK; 1999.