Experimental and numerical investigation on damage behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich panel with carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite facesheet and Nomex honeycomb core through experimental and numerical methods. Experiments were carried out on two thickness of honeycomb core at various impact energy levels. The dynamic response including contact force history and energy absorption as well as contact duration was recorded. The damage modes were obtained through non-destruction inspection (NDI) C-scan and microscopic observation. A refined three-dimensional finite element model combined with continuum damage mechanics (CDM) was developed with composite plies and detailed honeycomb core. Physically-based Puck’s composite failure criteria and energy based progressive damage model were used to capture the intralaminar damage initiation and evolution, respectively. The interlaminar damage of facesheet and debonding of facesheet/core interface were predicted using cohesive element. The hexagonal honeycomb cells were characterized in FE model with an elasto-plastic constitutive model and damage criterion in detail during impact. The simulation results show good agreements with experiments and the model can be used to predict the low-velocity impact response and impact damage effectively. More detailed responses, such as internal damage details, damage modes and evolution, are observed and discussed with the numerical model proposed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. Impact damage of composite sandwich structures in arctic condition10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.015 ↗
2. Zenkert · 1997
3. Effects of geometric configurations of corrugated cores on the local impact and planar compression of sandwich panels10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.130 ↗
4. Low-velocity impact behaviour of a shear thickening fluid (STF) and STF-filled sandwich composite panels10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.013 ↗
5. Numerical fracture analysis and model validation for disbonded honeycomb core sandwich composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.052 ↗
6. Abrate · 1998
7. Low-velocity impact resistance of ATH/epoxy core sandwich composite panels: Experimental and numerical analyses10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.070 ↗
8. Carlsson · 2011
9. Non-linear pre-buckling behavior of shear deformable thin-walled composite beams with open cross-section10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.11.003 ↗
10. System probability of failure and sensitivity analyses of composite plates under low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.054 ↗
11. The impact damage and residual load capacity of composite stepped bonding repairs and joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.096 ↗
12. An investigation of hygrothermal aging effects on high strain rate behaviour of adhesively bonded composite joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.030 ↗
13. Statistical finite element analysis of the buckling behavior of honeycomb structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.014 ↗
14. Testing and modeling of Nomex™ honeycomb sandwich Panels with bolt insert10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.006 ↗
15. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of Nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.034 ↗
16. Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using Nomex® honeycomb cores10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.024 ↗
17. Investigating the effects of fluid intrusion on Nomex® honeycomb sandwich structures with carbon fiber facesheets10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.054 ↗
18. Experimental and numerical analysis of the shear nonlinear behaviour of Nomex honeycomb core: Application to insert sizing10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.076 ↗
19. A comparison of progressive-failure criteria in the prediction of the dynamic bending failure of composite laminated beams10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.03.004 ↗
20. A damage evolution study of E-glass/epoxy composite under low velocity impact10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.016 ↗
21. A model of low-velocity impact damage of composite plates subjected to Compression-After-Impact (CAI) testing10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.097 ↗
22. Strain rate effects on the dynamic compressive response and the failure behavior of polyester matrix10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107040 ↗
23. Thermosetting CFRP interlaminar toughening with multi-layers graphene and MWCNTs under mode I fracture
24. Tomblin · 1999
25. Study on impact properties of through-thickness stitched foam sandwich composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.016 ↗
26. A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.007 ↗
27. Impact analysis of fiber reinforced polymer honeycomb composite sandwich beams10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.014 ↗
28. Analytical study of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.028 ↗
29. Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structures: modelling and experiment10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.064 ↗
30. Experimental and numerical investigations of residual strength after impact of sandwich panels10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.01.001 ↗
31. Finite element modelling of low velocity impact of composite sandwich panels10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-7 ↗
32. Numerical assessment of the impact behavior of honeycomb sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.010 ↗
33. Damage prediction in composite sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.010 ↗
34. FEM analysis of dynamic flexural behaviour of composite sandwich beams with foam core10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.018 ↗
35. Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.002 ↗
36. Numerical modeling of impact-damaged sandwich composites subjected to compression-after-impact loading10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00034-5 ↗
37. Experimental study of the low-velocity impact behaviour of primary sandwich structures in aircraft10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.019 ↗
38. Thomas D. McQuigg, Rakesh K. Kapania, Stephen J. Scotti and Sandra P. Walker. Compression After Impact on Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels with Thin Facesheets, Part 1: Experiments. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 23 - 26 April 2012, Honolulu, Hawaii.10.2514/6.2012-1703 ↗
39. Thomas D. McQuigg, Rakesh K. Kapania, Stephen J. Scotti and Sandra P. Walker. Compression After Impact on Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels with Thin Facesheets, Part 2: Analysis. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 23 - 26 April 2012, Honolulu, Hawaii.10.2514/6.2012-1704 ↗
40. A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.11.004 ↗
41. Impact damage prediction in carbon fiber-reinforced laminated composite using the matrix-reinforced mixing theory10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.021 ↗
42. An efficient approach for predicting low-velocity impact force and damage in composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.023 ↗
43. Numerical and experimental investigations of the low velocity impact in GFRP plates10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.039 ↗
44. Barely visible impact damage in scaled composite laminates: Experiments and numerical simulations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.008 ↗
45. Braided textile composites for sports protection: energy absorption and delamination in impact modelling10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.006 ↗
46. Evaluation of durability of composite materials applied to renewable marine energy: Case of ducted tidal turbine10.1016/j.egyr.2018.01.002 ↗
47. Numerical simulations of low-velocity impact on an aircraft sandwich panel10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.035 ↗
48. Prediction of impact damage on sandwich composite panels10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.044 ↗
49. Numerical modelling of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams with honeycomb core10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.025 ↗
50. Experimental and numerical study on honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and in-panel compression10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057 ↗
51. Buckling and progressive crushing of laterally loaded honeycomb10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.014 ↗
52. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010 ↗
53. Interaction of inter- and intralaminar damage in scaled quasi-static indentation tests: Part 1–Experiments10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.061 ↗
54. Determination of mode I & II strain energy release rates in composite foam core sandwiches. An experimental study of the composite foam core interfacial fracture resistance10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.044 ↗
55. 3D constitutive model of anisotropic damage for unidirectional ply based on physical failure mechanisms10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.09.008 ↗
56. Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites110.1115/1.3153664 ↗
57. A Progressive Damage Model for Laminated Composites Containing Stress Concentrations10.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
58. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials10.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
59. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00228-8 ↗
60. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
61. Henning F.A new efficient and reliable algorithm to determine the fracture angle for Puck's 3D matrix failure criterion for UD composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.033 ↗
62. An algorithm for determination of the fracture angle for the three-dimensional Puck matrix failure criterion for UD composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.004 ↗
63. An experimental and numerical investigation on low-velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact behavior of composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.043 ↗
64. Micro–macro FE modeling of damage evolution in laminated composite plates subjected to low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.063 ↗
65. Modelling failure of laminated composites using physically-based failure models
66. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
67. Camanho PP, Davila CG. Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737 2002:1–37.
68. Tarfaoui M., Hamitouche L, Vautrin A. Numerical investigation of composite laminate delamination with cohesive elements. In ICF Conference in Middle East and Africa, Luxor, Egypt; February 14–17, 2011.
69. An interface debonding law subject to viscous regularization for avoiding instability: application to the delamination problems10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.014 ↗
70. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part I: Experiments10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.009 ↗
71. Experimental and numerical analysis of dynamic compressive response of Nomex honeycombs10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.025 ↗
72. Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016 ↗
73. Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.007 ↗
74. Characterization of Nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.033 ↗
75. Seemann R, Krause D. Numerical modelling of Nomex honeycomb cores for detailed analyses of sandwich panel joints. In: 11th world congress on computational mechanics (WCCM XI), Barcelona, Spain; July 20–25 2014.