journal article·2019-07

Assessment of damage tolerance approaches for composite aircraft with focus on barely visible impact damage

Ramesh Talreja, Nam Phan

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Industry practice in composite aircraft damage tolerance, as reported in the open literature, is reviewed and examined in view of the current knowledge in the field of damage and failure of composite materials. Particular attention is paid to the challenging regime of damage tolerance when barely visible impact damage (BVID) is of concern. The validity of the compression after impact (CAI) testing as a means of assuring safety against failure from BVID is critically assessed. The role of in-field nondestructive evaluation (NDE) for quantifying the damage severity is considered as an integral part of the damage tolerance assessment. Finally, recommendations are made toward exploring other avenues for improving the current damage tolerance approaches as they apply to the case of BVID in composite structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Certification and compliance considerations for aircraft products with composite materials
2. Tada · 1973
3. Hinton · 2004
4. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ. (Guest Editors), Evaluation of theories for predicting failure in polymer composite laminates under 3-D states of stress: part a of the second world-wide failure exercise (WWFE-II), a special issue of J Compos Mater, 2012; 46 (19–20).
5. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ. (Guest Editors), Evaluation of theories for predicting failure in polymer composite laminates under 3-D states of stress: comparison with experiments, Part B of the second world-wide failure exercise (WWFE-II), a special issue of J Compos Mater, 2013; 47 (6–7).10.1177/0021998312473346 ↗
6. Talreja · 2010
7. PMC – Fundamentals
8. Mechatronically automated characterization of material constitutive response
9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, ‘Composite aircraft structure’, Advisory Circular AC No: 20-107B, Change 1, 24 August 2010.
10. Fawcett AJ, Oakes GD. Boeing Composite Airframe Damage Tolerance and Service Experience, 2006, pdf of slides available at Wichita.edu.
11. Morteau E, Fualdes C. Composites @ airbus damage tolerance methodology, FAA workshop for composites damage tolerance and maintenance, Chicago, Ill, July 19-21, 2006.
12. Engeleder A, Francescatti D, Burger U. Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation approach for composite rotorcraft airfame structures, AHS 70th annual forum, Montreal, Canada, May 20-24, 2014, American Helicopter Society International, Inc.
13. Physical modelling of failure in composites10.1098/rsta.2015.0280 ↗
14. Heida JH. In-service detection of impact damage in composite materials, NLR Report, NLR TP 89162L, Amsterdam, April 1989.
15. Douglas MJ, Nettles AT. A comparison of quasi-static indentation to low-velocity impact, NASA/TP-2000-210481, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Al, August 2000.
16. Shuck · 2010
17. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
18. Impact on laminated composites: recent advances10.1115/1.3111065 ↗
19. Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of laminated composites under compression after impact (CAI): experimental and numerical study
20. ASTM D7137/D7137M-12 · 2012
21. 2016 · 454
22. Reifsnider KL (editor), Damage in composite materials, ASTM STP 775, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1982.
23. A synergistic damage mechanics approach for composite laminates with matrix cracks in multiple orientations10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.02.008 ↗
24. On quantifying damage severity in composite materials by an ultrasonic method10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.087 ↗
25. Embedded non-destructive evaluation of structural health monitoring, damage detection, and failure prevention10.1177/0583102405052561 ↗
26. Correlation of fiber composite tensile strength with the ultrasonic stress wave factor10.1520/JTE11379J ↗
27. Acousto-ultrasonic characterization of fiber reinforced composites
28. Application of acousto-ultrasonics to quality control and damage assessment of composites