Blast resistance and multi-objective optimization of aluminum foam-cored sandwich panels
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, a group of metallic aluminum foam-cored sandwich panels (AFSPs) were used as vehicle armor against blast loading. The dynamic responses of the AFSPs with various combinations of face-sheet materials were analyzed using LS-DYNA. It was found that the AFSP with an aluminum (AA2024 T3) front face and a Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA) steel back face (labeled T3-AF-RHA) outperformed the other panel configurations in terms of maximum back face deflection (MaxD) and areal specific energy absorption (ASEA). It was also found that boundary conditions and the standoff distance (SoD) between an explosive and a target surface both have a remarkable influence on the blast response of the AFSPs. Using artificial neural network (ANN) approximation models, multi-objective design optimization (MDO) of the T3-AF-RHA panel was performed both with and without variations in blast load intensity. The optimization results show that the two objectives of MaxD minimization and ASEA maximization conflict with each other and that the optimal designs must be identified in a Pareto sense. Moreover, the Pareto curves obtained are different for varied blast impulse levels. Consequently, it is concluded that loading variation should be considered when designing such sandwich armors to achieve more robust blast-resistant performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Aluminum foam integral armor: a new dimension in armor design10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00029-0 ↗
2. The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading10.1115/1.1629109 ↗
3. Analytical investigation and optimal design of sandwich panels subjected to shock loading10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.027 ↗
4. Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00108-5 ↗
5. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
6. Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels—experimental investigations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.003 ↗
7. Behaviour of sandwich panels subjected to intense air blast – Part 1: experiments10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.009 ↗
8. Structural response and energy absorption of sandwich panels with an aluminium foam core under blast loading10.1260/136943308786412005 ↗
9. Close-range blast loading of aluminium foam panels10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00155-5 ↗
10. Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of blast-resistant performance of aluminum foam sandwich structures and optimization
12. Optimum design of metallic corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to blast loads10.1016/S0029-8018(00)00034-2 ↗
13. Design of Alporas aluminum alloy foam cored hybrid sandwich plates using Kriging optimization10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.007 ↗
14. The impulsive response of sandwich beams: analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour10.1016/j.jmps.2006.07.001 ↗
15. Behaviour of sandwich panels subject to intense air blasts – Part 2: numerical simulation10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.010 ↗
16. Axial crushing of tubes as an energy dissipating mechanism for the reduction of acceleration induced injuries from mine blasts underneath infantry vehicles10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.10.004 ↗
17. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strain, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands; 1983. p. 541–8.
18. Static and dynamic axial crushing of square thin-walled aluminium extrusions10.1016/S0734-743X(96)00025-5 ↗
19. Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
20. Kingery · 1984
21. Randers-Pehrson · 1997
22. Jones · 1989
23. A numerical simulation of the blast impact of square metallic sandwich panels10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.004 ↗
24. Springback of circular clamped armor steel plates subjected to spherical air-blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.008 ↗
25. Myers · 1995
26. Multi-objective stacking sequence optimization of laminated cylindrical panels using a genetic algorithm and neural networks10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.015 ↗
27. Optimization of composite stiffened panels under mechanical and hygrothermal loads using neural networks and genetic algorithms10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.024 ↗
28. Haykin · 1999
29. Nguyen D, Widrow B. Improving the learning speed of 2-layer neural networks by choosing initial values of the adaptive weights. In: 1990 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks – IJCNN 90 Part 3 (of 3), June 17, 1990–June 21, 1990. San Diego, CA, USA. IEEE; 1990. p. 21–6.10.1109/IJCNN.1990.137819 ↗
30. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
31. Parametric optimization of electrochemical machining of Al/15% SiCp composites using NSGA-II10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61010-8 ↗
32. Multi-objective optimization of curvilinear fiber shapes for laminated composite plates by using NSGA-II
33. SSAB. Oxelosund, Armox Protection Plate. AM International Specification; 2001.
34. Fluid–structure-interaction for a steel plate subjected to non-contact explosion10.1016/j.tafmec.2012.05.001 ↗
35. Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.08.001 ↗