Damage monitoring of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites using acoustic emission technique and deep learning
Source abstract
Abstract
In this research work, a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was trained for image-based Acoustic Emission (AE) waveform classification. AE waveforms from different damage modes of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites were used to train the CNN for online damage monitoring. Spectrograms of AE Waveforms from four different damage modes, matrix cracking, delamination, debonding, and fibre breakage, were obtained in their Mel scale and used as the training data and test data for the CNN. The overall prediction accuracy of the CNN is 97.9%, while the fibre breakage and delamination events were able to be predicted with 100% accuracy. Then this pre-trained CNN is used for online damage monitoring of mode I delamination test of CFRP specimens. AE waveforms generated during the mode I test are classified using the trained CNN and the results are analysed in terms of the classified AE descriptors. The classified AE descriptors proved to identify the occurrences of different damage modes, thereby validating the damage classification accuracy of the CNN.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Loading noise effects on the system identification of composite structures by dynamic tests with vibrodyne10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.032 ↗
2. Size effect and dynamic properties of 2D lattice materials10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.026 ↗
3. Higher modes of buckling in shear deformable nanobeams10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103338 ↗
4. Real-time frequency determination of acoustic emission for different fracture mechanisms in carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/0266-3538(95)00121-2 ↗
5. Size effects in the testing of fibre-composite materials10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-6 ↗
6. Sause MG. Failure of fiber-reinforced composites. In Situ Monitoring of Fiber-Reinforced Composites 2016: Springer; Cham. pp. 5-55.10.1007/978-3-319-30954-5_2 ↗
7. Application of different acoustic emission descriptors in damage assessment of fiber reinforced plastics: a comprehensive review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107083 ↗
8. A review: acoustic emission, a tool for composite-materials studies10.1007/BF02319949 ↗
9. Damage characterization of laminated composites using acoustic emission: A review10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108039 ↗
10. Simulation of acoustic emission in planar carbon fiber reinforced plastic specimens10.1007/s10921-010-0071-7 ↗
11. Do high frequency acoustic emission events always represent fibre failure in CFRP laminates?10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.013 ↗
12. Thirty years of advances and some remaining challenges in the application of acoustic emission to composite materials
13. Real-time frequency determination of acoustic emission for different fracture mechanisms in carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/0266-3538(95)00121-2 ↗
14. Damage characterization in composite materials using acoustic emission signal-based and parameter-based data
15. Non-destructive investigation of corrosion current density in steel reinforced concrete by artificial neural networks10.1016/j.acme.2012.10.007 ↗
16. Ultrasonic signal classification and imaging system for composite materials via deep convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.066 ↗
17. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks10.1111/mice.12263 ↗
18. Online Damage Monitoring of SiC f-SiC m Composite Materials Using Acoustic Emission and Deep Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2943210 ↗
19. Structural damage detection with automatic feature-extraction through deep learning10.1111/mice.12313 ↗
20. Damage classification in carbon fibre composites using acoustic emission: A comparison of three techniques10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.046 ↗
21. Acoustic emission data based deep learning approach for classification and detection of damage-sources in a composite panel10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109450 ↗
22. Structural vibration-based classification and prediction of delamination in smart composite laminates using deep learning neural network10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.118 ↗
23. Lu L, Wang X, Carneiro G, Yang L, editors. Deep learning and convolutional neural networks for medical imaging and clinical informatics. Springer International Publishing; 2019 Sep 19.10.1007/978-3-030-13969-8 ↗
24. Venkatesan · 2017
25. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
26. Deep learning
27. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision; 2015, pp. 1026-1034.10.1109/ICCV.2015.123 ↗
28. https://uk.mathworks.com/products/deep-learning.html (last accessed on July 19, 2021).
29. https://uk.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ref/nnet.cnn.trainingoptionssgdm.html (last accessed on July 19, 2021).
30. Shen J, Pang R, Weiss RJ, Schuster M, Jaitly N, Yang Z, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Skerrv-Ryan R, Saurous RA. Natural tts synthesis by conditioning wavenet on mel spectrogram predictions. In2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2018 Apr 15 (pp. 4779-4783). IEEE.10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8461368 ↗
31. Speech emotion recognition from 3D log-mel spectrograms with deep learning network10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2938007 ↗
32. Narayanan A, Wang D. Ideal ratio mask estimation using deep neural networks for robust speech recognition. In2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2013 May 26 (pp. 7092-7096). IEEE.10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639038 ↗
33. Medina R, Cerrada M, Cabrera D, Sánchez RV, Li C, De Oliveira JV. Deep learning-based gear pitting severity assessment using acoustic emission, vibration and currents signals. In: 2019 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Paris) 2019 May 2 IEEE, pp. 210-216.10.1109/PHM-Paris.2019.00042 ↗
34. Chuang WY, Tsai YL, Wang LH. Leak detection in water distribution pipes based on CNN with mel frequency cepstral coefficients. In: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence 2019 Mar 15, pp. 83-86.10.1145/3319921.3319926 ↗
35. Experimental wavelet analysis of acoustic emission signal propagation in CFRP10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.030 ↗
36. ASTM D5528-13, Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; 2013, www.astm.org.
37. Gillis PP. Dislocation motions and acoustic emissions. InAcoustic Emission 1972 Jan. ASTM International.10.1520/STP35379S ↗
38. Finkel P, Mitchell JR, Carlos MF. Experimental study of “Auto Sensor Test–Self Test Mode” for Acoustic Emission system performance verification. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 2000 May 23, vol. 509, no. 1, American Institute of Physics, pp. 1995-2002.10.1063/1.1291316 ↗