Machine learning-based prediction of CFST columns using gradient tree boosting algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Among recent artificial intelligence techniques, machine learning (ML) has gained significant attention during the past decade as an emerging topic in civil and structural engineering. This paper presents an efficient and powerful machine learning-based framework for strength predicting of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns under concentric loading. The proposed framework was based on the gradient tree boosting (GTB) algorithm which is one of the most powerful ML techniques for developing predictive models. A comprehensive database of over 1,000 tests on circular CFST columns was also collected from the open literature to serve as training and testing purposes of the developed framework. The efficiency of the proposed framework was demonstrated by comparing its performance with that obtained from other ML methods such as random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), decision tree (DT) and deep learning (DL). The accuracy of the developed predictive model was also verified with the current design equations from modern codes of practice as well as existing ML-based predictive models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning techniques for civil engineering problems10.1111/0885-9507.00065 ↗
2. Machine learning and its application to civil engineering systems10.1080/02630259608970203 ↗
3. Review on application of artificial intelligence in civil engineering
4. Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084 ↗
5. Background information of deep learning for structural engineering10.1007/s11831-017-9237-0 ↗
6. CNN-based image recognition for topology optimization10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105887 ↗
7. An artificial neural network-differential evolution approach for optimization of bidirectional functionally graded beams10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111517 ↗
8. Lee S, Zokhirova M, Nguyen TT, Lee J. Effect of hyper-parameters on deep learning networks in structural engineering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computational Mechanics (ACOME); 2017, pp. 537–44.10.1007/978-981-10-7149-2_36 ↗
9. A novel analysis-prediction approach for geometrically nonlinear problems using group method of data handling10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.052 ↗
10. A modified firefly algorithm-artificial neural network expert system for predicting compressive and tensile strength of high-performance concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.201 ↗
11. Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00165-3 ↗
12. Noorzaei J, Hakim S, Jaafar M, Thanoon W, Technology. Development of artificial neural networks for predicting concrete compressive strength. Int J Eng Technol 2007;4:141–53.
13. Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007 ↗
14. Building materials obtained by recycling coal ash and waste drilling fluid and characterization of engineering properties by means of Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.342 ↗
15. Sadati S, Silva LEBd, Wunsch DC, Khayat KH. Artificial intelligence to investigate modulus of elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete. ACI Mater J 2019;116:51–62.10.14359/51706948 ↗
16. Artificial neural network based modelling approach for strength prediction of concrete incorporating agricultural and construction wastes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.097 ↗
17. Prediction and sensitivity analysis of compressive strength in segregated lightweight concrete based on artificial neural network using ultrasonic pulse velocity10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.096 ↗
18. Prediction of compressive and flexural strengths of a modified zeolite additive mortar using artificial neural network10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.079 ↗
19. Predicting the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using hybrid artificial neural network with multi-objective grey wolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.065 ↗
20. Properties and material models for modern construction materials at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.055 ↗
21. Fire resistance evaluation through artificial intelligence - A case for timber structures10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.02.002 ↗
22. Heuristic machine cognition to predict fire-induced spalling and fire resistance of concrete structures10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102916 ↗
23. AI-based cognitive framework for evaluating response of concrete structures in extreme conditions10.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.004 ↗
24. Cognitive infrastructure - a modern concept for resilient performance under extreme events10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.004 ↗
25. Deriving temperature-dependent material models for structural steel through artificial intelligence10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.186 ↗
26. ANN models for prediction of residual strength of HSC after exposure to elevated temperature10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.03.011 ↗
27. Neural network models to predict explosive spalling of PP fiber reinforced concrete under heating10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101472 ↗
28. Akbarzadeh Bengar H, Shahmansouri AA, Akkas Zangebari Sabet N, Kabirifar K, W.Y. Tam V. Impact of elevated temperatures on the structural performance of recycled rubber concrete: experimental and mathematical modeling. Constr Build Mater 2020;255:119374.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119374 ↗
29. Properties and material models for construction materials post exposure to elevated temperatures10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103293 ↗
30. Explicit neural network model for predicting FRP-concrete interfacial bond strength based on a large database10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111998 ↗
31. Neural network-based formula for shear capacity prediction of one-way slabs under concentrated loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110501 ↗
32. Prediction of the moment capacity of reinforced concrete slabs in fire using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.07.006 ↗
33. Prediction of fire resistance of concrete filled tubular steel columns using neural networks10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00065-0 ↗
34. Practical artificial neural network tool for predicting the axial compression capacity of circular concrete-filled steel tube columns with ultra-high-strength concrete10.1016/j.tws.2020.106720 ↗
35. Efficiency of three advanced data-driven models for predicting axial compression capacity of CFDST columns10.1016/j.tws.2020.106744 ↗
36. Application of ANN in predicting ACC of SCFST column10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111332 ↗
37. Nguyen HQ, Ly H-B, Tran VQ, Nguyen T-A, Le T-T, Pham BT. Optimization of artificial intelligence system by evolutionary algorithm for prediction of axial capacity of rectangular concrete filled steel tubes under compression. Materials 2020;13:1205.10.3390/ma13051205 ↗
38. Utilization of artificial neural networks to prediction of the capacity of CCFT short columns subject to short term axial load10.1016/j.acme.2014.01.006 ↗
39. ANN model for predicting the compressive strength of circular steel-confined concrete10.1007/s40999-016-0096-0 ↗
40. Research on axial bearing capacity of rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular columns based on artificial neural networks10.1007/s11704-016-5113-6 ↗
41. Data-driven ultimate conditions prediction and stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112094 ↗
42. Djerrad A, Fan F, Zhi X-d, Wu Q-j. Artificial neural networks (ANN) based compressive strength prediction of AFRP strengthened steel tube. Int J Steel Struct 2020;20:156–74.10.1007/s13296-019-00276-6 ↗
43. Innovative models for prediction of compressive strength of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns using soft computing methods10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.048 ↗
44. Ren Q, Li M, Zhang M, Shen Y, Si W. Prediction of ultimate axial capacity of square concrete-filled steel tubular short columns using a hybrid intelligent algorithm. Appl Sci 2019;9:2802.10.3390/app9142802 ↗
45. An Artificial Neural Networks model for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP-confined concrete circular columns10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.047 ↗
46. Hung TV, Viet VQ, Van Thuat D. A deep learning-based procedure for estimation of ultimate load carrying of steel trusses using advanced analysis. J Sci Technol Civil Eng 2019;13:113–23.10.31814/stce.nuce2019-13(3)-11 ↗
47. A robust method for safety evaluation of steel trusses using Gradient Tree Boosting algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102825 ↗
48. A novel artificial intelligence technique to predict compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using ICA-XGBoost model
49. Predicting the compressive strength of concrete from its compositions and age using the extreme gradient boosting method10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119757 ↗
50. Machine learning-based compressive strength prediction for concrete: an adaptive boosting approach10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117000 ↗
51. Concrete-filled steel tube column system-its advantages
52. Design of concrete filled tubular beam-columns with high strength steel and concrete10.1016/j.istruc.2016.05.005 ↗
53. Concrete-filled fabricated steel box columns for multistorey buildings: behaviour and design10.1002/pse.2260010207 ↗
54. Numerical modelling of concrete-filled steel box columns incorporating high strength materials10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.07.014 ↗
55. EN1994-1-1. Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings; 2004.
56. BS5400-5. Steel, concrete and composite bridges. Code of practice for design of composite bridges. British Standards Institute (BSI); 2005.
57. AISC 360-16. Specification for structural steel buildings; 2016.
58. GB 50936. Technical code for concrete-filled steel tubular structures. China National Standards; 2014.
59. Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). Recommendations for design and construction of concrete filled steel tubular structures, Japan; 1997.
60. Standards Australia. AS/NZS 2327 Composite structures - Composite steel-concrete construction in buildings; 2017.
61. Ultra-high performance concrete: from fundamental to applications
62. Strength, stiffness and ductility of concrete-filled steel columns under axial compression10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.049 ↗
63. A new empirical formula for prediction of the axial compression capacity of CCFT columns
64. Concrete-filled steel tubular columns: test database, design and calibration10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.024 ↗
65. Test database on concrete-filled steel tubular columns
66. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗