Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of Nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation on the mechanical response of the Nomex honeycomb core subjected to transverse loading. Here, a series of tensile, stabilized compressive and step-by-step compressive tests were carried out, also a meso-scale finite element modelling method was developed to simulate the resin-paper-resin layered honeycomb cell walls by employing explicit shell elements. Through the analysis of the test results, the brittle fracture behaviour of the phenolic resin coating is recognised as a main reason of the honeycomb collapse. Both the strength and modulus of the honeycomb core in tension are higher than those in compression, due to the local buckling of the thin cell walls at a quite low level of compressive loading. From the numerical analysis, it was found that the volume of the resin coating has a positive effect on the collapse strength of the honeycomb core, however has no influence on the collapse strain. Moreover, the modulus of the resin coating has a positive effect on the collapse strength but a negative effect on the collapse strain. In addition, the strength of the resin coating has positive effects on both the collapse strength and strain of the honeycomb core.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. US Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Adminstration. AMT Airframe Handbook, vol. 2 (FAA-H-8083-31). .
2. Strain rate effects in phenolic composites and phenolic-impregnated honeycomb structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.027 ↗
3. Statistical finite element analysis of the buckling behaviour of honeycomb structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.014 ↗
4. Ratcliffe JG, Czabaj MW, Jackson WC. A Model for simulating the response of aluminum honeycomb structure to transverse loading. In: Proceedings of the American society for composites-27th technical conference, Arlington, Texas; 1–3 October 2012.
5. Virtual testing of sandwich core structures using dynamic finite element simulations10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.017 ↗
6. Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016 ↗
7. Testing and modeling of Nomex™ honeycomb sandwich panels with bolt insert10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.006 ↗
8. Heimbs S, Middendorf P, Hampf C, Hahnel F, Wolf K. Aircraft sandwich structures with folded core under impact load. In: Eighth international conference on sandwich structures (ICCS8), Feup, Porto; 2008. p. 369–80.
9. Compressive failure mechanisms in composite sandwich structures10.4050/JAHS.44.260 ↗
10. Impact resistance of composite laminated sandwich plates10.1177/002199839202601504 ↗
11. Damage characteristics of composite honeycomb sandwich panels in bending under quasi-static loading10.1177/1099636206056888 ↗
12. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings10.1115/1.3101689 ↗
13. Numerical modeling of impact-damaged sandwich composites subjected to compression-after-impact loading10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00034-5 ↗
14. Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008 ↗
15. Gibson · 1999
16. Buckling and progressive crushing of laterally loaded honeycomb10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.014 ↗
17. Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024 ↗
18. Honeycomb cores with enhanced buckling strength10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.021 ↗
19. Investigation on the square cell honeycomb structures under axial loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.022 ↗
20. On the determination of out-of-plane elastic properties of honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.12.005 ↗
21. HexWeb® honeycomb attributes and properties. Hexcel Corporation. Stamford, CT; 1999.
22. Simulation experiments on the effective in-plane compliance of the honeycomb materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.021 ↗
23. Mechanical properties of Nomex material and Nomex honeycomb structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.010 ↗
24. Core crush criterion to determine the strength of sandwich composite structures subjected to compression after impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.032 ↗
25. Experimental and numerical study of compression after impact of sandwich structures with metallic skins10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.045 ↗
26. Experimental analysis and modelling of the crushing of honeycomb cores10.1007/s10443-005-1125-3 ↗
27. Modelling of low-energy_low-velocity impact on Nomex honeycomb sandwich structures with metallic skins10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.008 ↗
28. Assessment of continuum models for sandwich panel honeycomb cores10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-6 ↗
29. Prediction of impact damage on sandwich composite panels10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.044 ↗
30. McQuigg TD. Compression after impact experiments and analysis on honeycomb core sandwich panels with thin facesheets. NASA/CR-2011-217157; 2011.
31. Experimental characterization of phenolic-impregnated honeycomb sandwich structures for transportation vehicles10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.012 ↗
32. Numerical modelling of honeycomb crush behaviour10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008 ↗
33. Numerical simulation of low velocity impact on an aircraft sandwich panel10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.035 ↗
34. Finite element modelling of low velocity impact of composite sandwich panels10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-7 ↗
35. Local displacement of core in two-layer sandwich structures subjected to low-velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.019 ↗
36. A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures
37. Analysis of the dynamic flexural behaviour of composite beams at low temperature10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.002 ↗
38. A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.007 ↗
39. Hähnel F, Wolf K. Evaluation of the material properties of resin-impregnate NOMEX® paper as basis for the simulation of the impact behaviour of honeycomb sandwich. In: Third international conference on composite testing and model identification, Porto, Portugal; 2006.
40. Modelling of crushing due to impact in honeycomb sandwiches10.1177/109963620000200203 ↗
41. Modelling of composite sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.013 ↗
42. Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.007 ↗
43. Numerical modelling of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams with honeycomb core10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.025 ↗
44. Seemann R, Krause D. Numerical modelling of Nomex honeycomb cores for detailed analysis of sandwich panel joints. In: 11th World congress on computational mechanics (WCCM XI), fifth european conference on computational mechanics (ECCM V), sixth European conference on computational fluid dynamics (ECFD VI), Barcelona, Spain; 20–25 July 2014.
45. Roy R, Park SJ, Kweon JH, Choi JH. Characterization of Nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties. Compos Struct. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.033.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.033 ↗
46. Compressive mechanical properties of the Nomex/thermoset honeycomb cores10.1002/(SICI)1099-1581(199701)8:1<1::AID-PAT601>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
47. Study on Properties of T722 Nomex honeycomb
48. ASTM international. ASTM C 365/C365M-11a: standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States; 2011.
49. ASTM international. ASTM C 297/C297M-04: standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States; 2011.
50. NPCS board of consultants & engineers. Phenolic resins technology handbook, New Delhi: NIIR Project Consultancy Services; 2007.
51. The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs10.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7 ↗
52. Elastic collapse of honeycombs under out-of-plane pressure10.1016/0020-7403(91)90033-Y ↗
53. Mechanical buckling instability of thin coatings deposited on soft polymer substrates10.1023/A:1004707906821 ↗
54. Fan X, Verpoest I, Vandepitte D. Finite element analysis on out-of-plane compression properties of thermoplastic honeycomb. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on sandwich structures, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; 29–31 August 2005. p. 875–84.10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_88 ↗
55. Hibbitt D, Karlsson B, Sorensen P. ABAQUS documents (version 6.12). Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation, Providence, RI, USA; 2012.
56. Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp10.1016/S0301-679X(00)00087-6 ↗
57. Influence of functional graphene as filler on the tribological behaviors of Nomex fabric phenolic composite10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.001 ↗
58. Ratna · 2009
59. Kilchert SV. Nonlinear finite element modelling of degradation and failure in folded core composite sandwich structures. Docterate Dissertation. University of Stuttgart; 2013.