journal article·2011-01Open access

Crushing and energy absorption performance of different geometrical shapes of small-scale glass/polyester composite tubes under quasi-static loading conditions

Sivakumar Palanivelu, Wim Van Paepegem, Joris Degrieck, John Vantomme, Dimitrios Kakogiannis, Johan Van Ackeren, Danny Van Hemelrijck, Jan Wastiels

Composite Structures· Volume 93· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the quasi-static crushing performance of nine different geometrical shapes of small-scale composite tubes. The idea is to understand the effect of geometry, dimension and triggering mechanism on the progressive deformation of small-scale composite tubes. Different geometrical shapes of the composite tubes have been manufactured by hand lay-up technique using uni-directional E-glass fabric (with single and double plies) and polyester resin. Dedicated quasi-static tests (144 tests) have been conducted for all nine geometrical shapes with different t / D (thickness–diameter) ratios and two triggering profiles (45° chamfering and tulip pattern with an included angle of 90°). From this unique study, it was found that the crushing characteristics and the corresponding energy absorption of the special geometrical shapes are better than the standard geometrical shapes such as square and hexagonal cross sections. Furthermore, the tulip triggering attributed to a lower peak crush load followed by a steady mean crush load compared to the 45° chamfering triggering profile which resulted into a higher energy absorption in most of the geometrical shapes of the composite tubes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Kotzialis C, Derdas C, Kostopoulos V. Blast behaviour of plates with sacrificial cladding. In: 5th GRACM international congress on computational mechanics, June 29–July 1, Limassol, Cyprus; 2005.
2. Layered sacrificial claddings under blast loading Part II – experimental studies10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00005-1 ↗
3. Close-range blast loading of aluminium foam panels10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00155-5 ↗
4. The potential for composites in structural automotive applications10.1016/0266-3538(86)90002-3 ↗
5. James A. Performance comparison of plastic composites with metals for vertical body panel applications. SAE Technical paper; 1999 [1999-01-08480].10.4271/1999-01-0848 ↗
6. Kostopoulos V, Markopoulos YP, Vlachos DE, Galiotis C, Melanitis NE. A heavy duty composite bridge made of glass polyester pultruded box beams. In: Proceedings of RTO applied vehicle technology panel (AVT) specialists’ meeting on “Low cost composite structures”. Loen, Norway; May 7–11, 2001.
7. Microstructural design of composite materials for crashworthy structural applications10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00098-8 ↗
8. Progressive crushing of stitched glass/polyester composite cylindrical shells10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.002 ↗
9. A unified approach to progressive crushing of fibre-reinforced composite tubes10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J ↗
10. Fairfull AH, Hull D. Effect of specimen dimensions on the specific energy absorption of fibre composite tubes. In: Proceedings of ICCM-VI; 1987. p. 3.36–.45.
11. Effect of specimen geometry on the energy absorption of composite materials10.1177/002199838602000406 ↗
12. Energy absorption in composite tubes10.1177/002199838201600606 ↗
13. Fiber reinforced plastic composites for energy absorption purposes10.1016/0266-3538(85)90026-0 ↗
14. On the response of thin-walled CFRP composite tubular components subjected to static and dynamic axial compressive loading: experimental10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.021 ↗
15. Crashworthy capability of composite material structures10.1016/S0263-8223(97)80005-0 ↗
16. Effect of trigger geometry on energy absorption in composite profiles10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00081-1 ↗
17. Energy absorption capability of fibreglass composite square frusta subjected to static and dynamic axial collapse10.1016/0263-8231(95)00057-7 ↗
18. Energy absorption of composite materials
19. Comparison of energy absorption of carbon/epoxy and carbon/PEEK composite tubes10.1016/0010-4361(92)90184-V ↗
20. On the experimental investigation of crash energy absorption in laminate splaying collapse mode of FRP tubular components10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.002 ↗
21. The crush behavior of pultruded tubes at high strain rates
22. The static and dynamic axial collapse of fibreglass composite automotive frame rails10.1016/0263-8223(95)00134-4 ↗
23. Crushing characteristics of composite tubes with “near elliptical” cross sections10.1177/002199839202601203 ↗
24. Crushing response of composite corrugated tubes to quasi-static axial loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.06.002 ↗
25. An experimental and numerical crashworthiness investigation of thermoplastic composite crash boxes10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.028 ↗
26. Quasi-static axial and lateral crushing of radial corrugated composite tubes10.1016/j.tws.2007.07.018 ↗
27. Effect of fibre and matrix maximum strain rate on the energy absorption of composite materials10.1177/002199838602000401 ↗
28. Scaling effects in the energy absorption of carbon-fiber/PEEK composite tubes10.1016/0266-3538(95)00081-X ↗
29. Studies of scale effects for crash on laminated structures10.1023/A:1021196811432 ↗
30. Energy absorption in composite structures
31. Experimental study on the axial crushing behaviour of pultruded composite tubes10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.005 ↗