A comprehensive review on structural joining techniques in the marine industry
Source abstract
Abstract
Exposure to aggressive environmental conditions and specific loads necessitate precise material selection and manufacturing techniques. Techniques such as overlamination, welding, adhesive bonding, mechanical joining, and hybrid joining are currently used to join different marine structures components. This review groups the published investigations to cover a wide range of geometries, materials, and loading types and organizes them in a chronological context. Comparing joining methods shows that each technique has a considerable potential to be employed in the various marine industry sectors corresponding to the desired application. Besides the significant strength, poor fatigue life is a concerning issue for welding. One of the most crucial challenges in mechanical fastening is drilling holes in composite materials that damages the fibres. Adhesive bonding provides superior advantages such as higher strength to weight ratio and fatigue life, whilst the susceptibility to environmental conditions must be considered. To overcome the drawbacks of each approach, the hybrid joining technique is introduced which combines two different joining methods to achieve the optimum performance. To have the most durable, and reliable structure, major criteria such as the structure application, the fabrication process, and the tolerance of adverse environment must be considered to design the marine structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Tsinker · 2012
2. Marine Structures: Future Trends and the Role of Universities10.15302/J-ENG-2015004 ↗
3. The potential for the use of composite materials in marine structures10.1016/0951-8339(94)90034-5 ↗
4. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
5. Fracture behaviour of composite maritime T-joints10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.052 ↗
6. Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: a review10.3390/jmse8010026 ↗
7. Applications of composites in marine industry
8. Finite element analysis of composite-to-steel type of joint for marine industry10.1007/s40194-016-0343-7 ↗
9. A Study on the Basic Design and its Characteristics of 50ft-class CFRP Cruise Boat10.7837/kosomes.2013.19.6.674 ↗
10. Biopolymers and composites: Properties, characterization and their applications in food, medical and pharmaceutical industries10.1016/j.jece.2021.105322 ↗
11. Fatigue damage criteria classification, modelling developments and trends for welded joints in marine structures10.1080/17445302.2018.1463609 ↗
12. Considerations of probability-based fatigue design for marine structures10.1016/0951-8339(88)90009-3 ↗
13. Bond behavior of CFRP-steel double-lap joints exposed to marine atmosphere and fatigue loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.012 ↗
14. Bond durability of fatigued CFRP-steel double-lap joints pre-exposed to marine environment10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.021 ↗
15. Experimental and analytical strength analysis of double-lap joints for marine applications10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.07.002 ↗
16. Examination of key aspects defining the performance characteristics of out-of-plane joints in FRP marine structures10.1016/1359-835X(95)00021-S ↗
17. Experimental and numerical study of composite T-joints for marine application10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.03.002 ↗
18. Advanced manufacturing techniques for composite structures used in aerospace industries10.1016/B978-0-12-819496-6.00001-4 ↗
19. Hybrid ultrasonic spot welding of aluminum to carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.002 ↗
20. A Review on Various Welding Techniques
21. Agarwal DC, Behrens R. Results of Various Corrosion and Mechanical Tests on Cold Reduced Bars of Alloy 59, UNS NO6059, for Fastener Applications. CORROSION 2005: OnePetro; 2005.10.5006/C2005-05231 ↗
22. Corrosion rates of fasteners in treated wood exposed to 100% relative humidity10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(758) ↗
23. Degradation in Seawater of Structural Adhesives for Hybrid Fibre-Metal Laminated Materials10.1155/2013/869075 ↗
24. Dimensioning method for bolted, adhesively bonded, and hybrid joints involving Fibre-Reinforced-Polymers10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.074 ↗
25. Polymer joining techniques state of the art review10.1007/s40194-021-01143-x ↗
26. Creative design for sandwich structures: A review10.1177/1729881420921327 ↗
27. Analysis of overlaminated double-lap joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.002 ↗
28. Qin TL, Zhao LB, Huang H. Damage investigation and design of woven composite bonded joint. Key Engineering Materials: Trans Tech Publ; 2010. p. 861-4.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.417-418.861 ↗
29. Determination of the stress distribution in foam-cored sandwich construction composite tee joints10.1243/0309324011514700 ↗
30. Influence of π overlaminates on the mechanical behavior of all-composite adhesively bonded π joints10.1177/0731684414522331 ↗
31. Hamitouche L, Tarfaoui M, Vautrin A. Design and Test of a Sandwich T-Joint for Naval Ships. Damage and Fracture Mechanics: Springer; 2009. p. 131-41.10.1007/978-90-481-2669-9_14 ↗
32. Fatigue failure mechanisms in fibre-reinforced plastic laminated tee joints10.1016/0142-1123(95)98238-X ↗
33. Design of X-joints in sandwich structures for naval vessels
34. Adhesive and composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under tensile loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.005 ↗
35. Strength prediction of composite Π joints under tensile load10.1177/0021998310369593 ↗
36. Shear failure mechanisms and influences of overlaminate configuration on the failure of composite π joints10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.062 ↗
37. Di Bella G, Galtieri G, Pollicino E, Borsellino C. Joining of GFRP in marine applications. Advances in Materials Science Research; Nova Science Publishers, Inc: Hauppauge, NY, USA. 2012;12:185-215.
38. 3 - Manufacture of marine composite sandwich structures
39. Prepreg processing science and engineering10.1002/pen.760331805 ↗
40. Optimizing vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM)
41. Interlaminar tests for marine applications. Evaluation of the influence of peel plies and fabrication delays10.1007/s10443-005-1324-y ↗
42. Effects of transverse stitching and hygrothermal environment on composite wing T-joints10.1177/073168403027991 ↗
43. Najafi M, Noorabadi M. Effects of Core Material, Overlamination and Fillet Shape on Natural Frequencies of Sandwich T-joints.
44. Zhang JY, Fu Y, Zhao LB, Chang HF, Fei BJ. Tensile strength prediction of woven composite bonded joint. Advanced Materials Research: Trans Tech Publ; 2010. p. 59-62.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.139-141.59 ↗
45. Failure mode shift of sandwich composite L-Joint for ship structures under tension load10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107863 ↗
46. Failure prediction of composite sandwich L-joint under bending10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.022 ↗
47. Effects of joint geometry and material on stress distribution, strength and failure of bonded composite joints: an overview10.1080/00218464.2018.1554483 ↗
48. Adams · 2005
49. da Silva · 2011
50. Knox · 1996
51. Simla Ay DR. Marine Applications for Adhesives and Sealants. 2020.
52. Martin J. MMA adhesives in the marine industry. 2019.
53. Hollaway L. Advances in adhesive joining of dissimilar materials with special reference to steels and FRP composites. In: Chen and Teng (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures (BBFS 2005) 2005.
54. Adhesive bonding of thick steel adherends for marine structures10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00029-5 ↗
55. Performance of butt strap joints for marine applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.01.010 ↗
56. Mechanical behavior of polyurethane adhesive joints used in laminated materials for marine structures10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.044 ↗
57. Influence of process induced defects on the failure of composite T-joint specimens10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.021 ↗
58. Banea MD, da Silva L. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2009;223:1-18.10.1243/14644207JMDA219 ↗
59. Numerical analysis of adhesively bonded T-joints with structural sandwiches and study of design parameters10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.005 ↗
60. Design and test of lightweight sandwich T-joint for naval ships10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.031 ↗
61. The strength of adhesively bonded T-joints10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00009-X ↗
62. Numerical investigation on novel geometrical configuration for adhesively bonded T-joint between aluminum and sandwich panel10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.039 ↗
63. Fatigue behaviour of T-joints for marine applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.07.002 ↗
64. Molland · 2011
65. Experimental and numerical analysis of T-peel joints for the automotive industry10.1163/156856108X383529 ↗
66. Geometrically non-linear analysis of adhesively bonded corner joints10.1163/156856199X00181 ↗
67. Optimal design of an adhesively-bonded corner joint with single support based on the free vibration analysis10.1163/156856106778666426 ↗
68. Analysis and design of adhesively bonded corner joints10.1016/0143-7496(93)90025-5 ↗
69. Analysis and design of adhesively bonded corner joints: fillet effect10.1016/0143-7496(94)90026-4 ↗
70. Static and fatigue tests of hybrid composite-to-steel butt joints
71. An investigation of the tensile strength of a composite-to-metal adhesive joint10.1007/s10443-010-9137-z ↗
72. Experimental and numerical study of the bolt reinforcement of a composite-to-steel butt-joint under three-point bending test10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.08.009 ↗
73. Li XW, Li P, Lin Z, Yu H. Mechanical Characterisation of Composite Sandwich to Steel Joint for Marine Structures. Materials Science Forum: Trans Tech Publ; 2015. p. 210-9.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.813.210 ↗
74. Adhesive joint strength of hybrid assemblies: Titanium sheet-composites and aluminium sheet-composites—Experimental and numerical verification10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.006 ↗
75. Effect of residual strains on the static strength of dissimilar single lap adhesive joints
76. Considerations for the industrial application of structural adhesive joints in the aluminium–composite material bonding10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.026 ↗
77. Experimental study on steel to FRP bonded lap joints in marine applications10.1155/2015/164208 ↗
78. Qualification of adhesives for marine composite-to-steel applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.004 ↗
79. Fracture energy assessment of adhesives Part II: Is GIIc an adhesive material property?(A neural network analysis)10.1016/j.jajp.2021.100049 ↗
80. Akhavan-Safar A, Beygi R, Delzendehrooy F, da Silva L. Fracture energy assessment of adhesives–Part I: Is GIC an adhesive property? A neural network analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2021;235:1461-76.10.1177/14644207211002763 ↗
81. The Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Behavior of a Structural Polyurethane Adhesive10.1080/00218464.2014.903802 ↗
82. Effect of Adhesive Type and Thickness on the Lap Shear Strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
83. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints10.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
84. da Silva · 2018
85. Mode II fracture toughness of a brittle and a ductile adhesive as a function of the adhesive thickness10.1080/00218464.2010.506155 ↗
86. Marine auxiliary machinery
87. Failure of plastics and rubber products: causes, effects and case studies involving degradation
88. Maxwell A, Broughton W, Dean G, Sims G. Review of accelerated ageing methods and lifetime prediction techniques for polymeric materials. 2005.
89. Behaviour of environmentally degraded epoxy adhesives as a function of temperature10.1080/00218464.2016.1179118 ↗
90. Environmental crack and craze growth phenomena in polymers10.1098/rspa.1975.0012 ↗
91. Experimental investigations and model study of moisture behaviors in polymeric materials10.1016/j.microrel.2009.03.006 ↗
92. Environmental effect on the fatigue degradation of adhesive joints: a review10.1080/00218464.2016.1179117 ↗
93. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
94. Modelling anomalous moisture uptake, swelling and thermal characteristics of a rubber toughened epoxy adhesive10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.002 ↗
95. Minford · 1993
96. Moisture absorption–desorption effects in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.05.001 ↗
97. Prediction of Mechanical Behaviour of a Bulk Epoxy Adhesive in a Marine Environment10.1080/00218464.2017.1377616 ↗
98. Modelling the environmental degradation of adhesively bonded aluminium and composite joints using a CZM approach10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.015 ↗
99. Durability of adhesively bonded steel under salt spray and hydrothermal stress conditions10.1016/0143-7496(90)90101-3 ↗
100. Effect of hygrothermal aging on the quasi-static behaviour of CFRP joints varying the overlap length10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.035 ↗